EPA Chief: Climategate Means Absolutely Nothing
Lisa jackson is Obama’s right hand in the hoax called global warming. Today, the EPA handed itself complete control of American industry. If cap and trade faiils to pass, Obama can achieve the same thing through the EPA’s new powers as the absolute, unchecked dictator of American life.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Administrator Lisa Jackson dismissed GOP calls to delay a critical finding on greenhouse emissions in light of hacked e-mails from climate scientists.
EPA documents released Monday state that greenhouse gases threaten human health — a finding that is a precursor to planned regulations controlling emissions from power plants, vehicles and other sources.
Republicans including House Oversight and Government Reform Committee ranking member Darrell Issa (Calif.) said e-mails among climate scientists hacked from a British research institute show holes in the case that humans are causing global warming.
Jackson disagreed.
“There is nothing in the hacked e-mails that undermines the science upon which this decision is based,” Jackson said in announcing the finding this afternoon. She said the controversial messages dealt only with a tiny fraction of the strong evidence of global warming.
 |
|
[...] the EPA handed itself complete control of American industry. If cap and trade faiils to pass, Obama can achieve the same thing through the EPA’s new powers as the absolute, unchecked dictator of American life.” Filed under: Capitalism, the Unknown [...]
Indictment await you when this ass hat is removed from office! Better see if you can raise Johnnie Cochran from the dead.
[...] I see something about the current doings in DC — say, oh, something like the head of the EPA dismissing the Climategate emails with a disdainful sniff, because as far as she is concerned the science is settled and we will be going back to the nice, [...]
That “tiny fraction” just formed the basis upon which nearly all other evidence was derived. That’s what citations are all about, building a case based upon the work of others. The fact that the basis data set is fraudulent renders all subsequent findings derived from that fraudulent data set void. It is the classic ‘garbage in; garbage out’ cliche’. I guess this fact is to ’scientific’ for our EPA friends.
I simply cannot understand how our military/judiciary can fail to act to remove these ridiculous assholes.