Bring it on, A-hole. Cheney will clean your clock.
thrasymakhos
Y’all remember the Cheney/Edwards VP debate in ’04? I think it would be worse than that. Cheney totally spanked Edwards to the point I was embarrassed to watch anymore.
http://holgerawakens.blogspot.com Holger Awakens
Rep. Massa served as an aide to Gen. Wesley Clark. Need I say anymore?
Turtleherder
Truth…In my 54 years on this planet I have never seen or heard a liberal democrat tell the truth.
They haven’t the slightest idea what truth is !
mike3481
Yup.
Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran)
They can’t even answer yes or no for that matter.Furthewr proof they don’t have a clucking flue.
libertarian
You are a king, then!” said Pilate. Jesus answered, “You are right in saying I am a king. In fact, for this reason I was born, and for this I came into the world, to testify to the truth. Everyone on the side of truth listens to me.”
“What is truth?” Pilate asked.
mike3481
“Speaking truth to power”? wtf does that even mean? Well, I looked around online and found a deconstruction of the phrase that seems to fit ->
The expression, which has been around for quite a while, is brilliantly parsimonious. In just four simple words (really only three, since one of them is “to”), it succinctly encapsulates the left’s view–both of itself, and of the way the world works.
First, there’s “truth.” One of the hallmarks of much leftist thought is the idea of their own moral (not just doctrinal or analytic) superiority. The left’s definition of “truth” often seems to be that it consists of whatever they believe to be true. Ergo, whenever they “speak” (word three), it’s “truth” by definition; they certainly don’t need no steenking facts cluttering up their truth.
Next, there’s “power.” The left is all about power differentials. Third-world countries or those perceived as powerless are always right (i.e. “truthful”); powerful countries are always wrong. It’s not, of course, just about international relations and countries, it’s also about people and economics: poor people=good (powerless), rich people=bad (powerful).
politicalfish
Frankly, as diagnoses go, I’d rather have ‘policial tourettes’, than ‘shit-for-brains’, so Mr. Cheney is better off than Mr. Massa.
CPLViper
I would pay money to see that debate … per-per-view … live … donkey-ass-whipping.
Sully
Nah… Massa is only worthy of ridicule.
Sully
He won his seat by 5000 votes – 51%-49%- on Barry’s coattails.
He’s a liberal advocate of single payer health care who only revealed that fact after he won.
He’s can’t hide being a Marxist Progressive anymore so he’s doubling down and mouthing off hoping that demonizing Cheney will save his sorry ass in 2010.
In a Chicago-style thugocracy they call that ‘strategy’ *speaking power to truth*.
GRIZZ
youll be waterboarding yourself before the end of the “debate”,you fucking worm
Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran)
Where ma check? Massa say he gonna take careume,noumsain?
Tyler
Nothing Mr. Massa claims indiciates the words coming from Cheney are untruths. As for Mr. Massa, nothing but diarrhea spills from his mouth.
MinneSoCold
Lets get this debate on the calendar….but knowing Obama & dems, they would not allow it to happen since they’re all afraid to debate Cheney face-to-face.
MIDTN
You’ll be calling Cheney “massa” when he gets through with you.
Total bullshit. Not even a good bluff.
Steven D
Wow, talk about bringing a knife to a gunfight. Massa, I think you’re in for a rude surprise.