Pat Dollard

Pat,

I thought I had a pretty good bead on Evan from watching his “1st?” Heritage Foundation video.

But after tonight’s JKH show, I’m not so sure.

This episode of JKH is nothing less than a teachable moment.

It was a gas (and a privilege) listening to two Conservatives who’s brains are that well connected to their mouths. Uh-huh.

:beer:

Thank you. It’s about to be featured on Big Hollywood.

:beer:

I’m giving Evan your email. He wants to write you.

O.K.

Yes, but what is the original source of Liberal indiscriminateness? I don’t think that Evan has researched the issue to the extent that I have. And I’m sure he has not researched it to the extent that John DeFrees has. Why are Liberals so against discrimination that they will destroy their own country, even their own species? Who gains from Americans not being able to tell right from wrong? Evan doesn’t explain WHY Americans should give up on right and wrong.

We are not up against an ethereal belief on the part of five year olds. THEY ARE BEING USED BY COMMUNISTS TO DEFEAT US.

I brought your comment to Evan’s attention. I brought up the issue of how Communism was using the principle of indiscriminateness on the show.

We’ll await his response.

Is communism not just the natural progression of indiscriminateness at least for the true believers? Of course for some any ideology is nothing more than the most accessible route to wrench power and wealth from those who now have it.

Evan Sayet may be the most enjoyable and thought provoking of listens around.

He may be intentionally reluctant to acknowledge that truly evil and/or defective individuals exist and that the Left is a natural home for these people.

From Evan:

“My very quick answer at this ever-gowing late hour is that, in a world without consequences — which ALL of our worlds have been being lucky enough to be born in this time in this place — the ONLY good, decent and moral answer is the one that is without discrimination. If NOTHING has a cost (as is true of our lives) then indiscriminateness is the ONLY right answer,.

More to follow…maybe.”

Evan does not allow for, yet, nicely explains by default why those of us who, admittedly, mostly by choice still live with real risk and consequences in our lives are naturally Right leaning. The simple experience of real individual risk may be the dividing line.

Much more often, stupidity will suffice.
Malice requires a more organized level of thought than *most* ‘liberals’ are capable.
The more ‘intellectual’ members will do the ‘wet work’ for them.

The agenda of Progressive ideology is for it to think for you. To define ‘self-interest’ for you. To ‘shout down’ and ridicule anyone that advocates ‘critical thinking’ and proposes you think for yourself.
‘Nanny state’ is doing the hard work of thinking and deciding for you, not just which doctor you get to see.

Thank goodness for replay! lol.

Pat, I loved the “should Brown win, Ted Kennedy will have died for his country”. Hilarious! :gun: :beer:

Very good show Pat! And I need to listen to Evan over and over again. My brain still needs washed from the many years of liberal brain washing. Thanks for having him on.

During the show, I once again posited the question in the chat: Why didn’t Leftist brainwashing work on all of us? How did we here escape total subversive defeat? What parameters enable a person to see through the communist anti-American propaganda?

It seems to me that the answer to this, a study of the issue, might be valuable. The ability to understand this sort of subversive attack, and to REPROGRAM the victims, might come in handy.

Evan is yet another liberal who has changed his view. He explained this during the show, and explained his own circumstances post 9/11. To be sure, most liberals who change sides all have unique and different reasons. But there must be underlying commonalities. We should make a concerted effort to discover these, and find an efficient method of reprogramming evil, traitorous Leftist shitheads. And, yes I am aware that Christian Patriot Greg, from his own experience, maintains that it is very likely impossible.

I would rather re-program my brainwashed countrymen, and bring them back to being true Americans. I don’t believe we have enough ammo for the alternative.

Communists are Internationalists, they want the entire world because of the resources. They want to attack the USA because of its huge amount of resources, plus we’re a massive power that can stop them. Everyone else will come to them with our demise anyway.

Some Jews may be hesitant to discuss Israel because they automatically associate it with Zionism.

Zionism is fearful to Jews today, because it means the return of the Israelites to their homeland to re-establish the Jewish state.

Zionism is no more; it has been accomplished. The only ones trying to keep this outdated term alive are fascists who enjoy it’s implication to return the Jews to one place for Armageddon. That’s why you see Rabbis, who denounce Zionism, on a “friendly” visit with Ahmadinijad. They mock him.

So, for all you Jews: support for Israel doesn’t mean support for Zionism.

lol
C’mon Evan and Pat… thank Mertin for the compliment.
Intellectual polemics is far better than the blatant sophistry of the poser Mertin.

It’s spelled “poseur,” and Mertin’s point is both valid and well made. Sayet is in no way an intellectual. He is a polemicist in precisely the same way Sean Hannity is not a journalist (which he has repeatedly said himself); he is a pundit and proponent for the conservative right, exactly as Sayet is.

No. Wrong on every point.
“Poseur” is merely an affectation of “poser”. Meaning is the same but, hey, you likely prefer affectation.
And Mertin’s ‘well made and valid point’ (according to you) was to accuse Evan of lying (not a characteristic of polemics btw) about US ‘imperialism’, using a list of examples he likely copy/pasted from a Communist Party website.
Since Mertin has you to defend him, how is the Cold War vs. Russia a “valid” example of US imperialism?

Find someone who has a dictionary and who can read explain them to you. They are not the same word, nor are they even related.

Every person who finds gaping holes in your arguments is not a communist/faggot/leftard/subversive; it’s just that they learned how to read a history book rather than spend their fucking lives listening to a truck stop preacher scream at them.

Oh, and when in the history of planet fucking Earth did a word have an “affectation?!” Is this “make-shit-up-as-you-go-along Week” or are you just trying to sound like Alex Trebek because you always thought he was a college professor?

You’re the “truck stop preacher” asshole.
Now blubbering and blustering and answer the question I asked you.
Fucking dumbass poser.

Go fuck your mother. The Navy’s done with her.

FAIL
Now apologize to Evan and Pat and then repeat after me….
“I, MohammedSucksHogCock, am NOT smarter than a 5th grader cos I’m a dumbfuck lib POS.”

Thank God Almighty for the Zionists.

What the fuck is this bullshit youre spouting. This list is “proof” of America’s Imperialist past? Not only do you refuse to comment on the polical “merits” of each action, but you offer no evidence as to why each “action” was imperialist. Your comment is a bullshit screen to mask you and your boyfriend MSHC’s real agenda, which is to distract from the issues being discussed. Go fuck yourselves with the other faggot libs. :beer:

MohammedSucksHogCock

Glad you discern what are really the great spirits that makes rainings or sunshines on this board

:beer:

Sully likes to display the illusion that he is a great thinker, but nonentheless isn’t able to hold a rational argument without prejugés, thus thowing colorful words at you, but I’m gratful to him, I considerably improved my english

uh, anymore left in your bag ?

Enjoyable to listen to Pat. Both you and Evan make good points. I usually find conversations like this a bore. But this one I did not.

Just yesterday, I was watching a rerun of the construction of the first nuclear bomb. I could not help of thinking of the irony in the fact that it was predominantly persecuted Jews who helped construct the nuclear bomb.

Now many may believe that was just happenstance and chance. Many probably didn’t even notice. I believe otherwise. I believe it was divine intervention that no mortal man can possibly understand, and a small example of how God moves nations and controls destiny.

A small revelation of what is to come.

lol
you’re in ‘good company’ there mertin and mshc when a French Socialist drives by and ‘defends’ your imperialism ‘argument’ (something where the French actually have a history) with no trace of logic of her own.
Like you.

repeat a lie ten times, it has no chance to be absorbed, but if you repeat it 1000 times it will be hold as a truth

true for you

and I’m not vexed if you accociate me with the above persons, they are good sense ones, unlike you and your stubborness

Now that’s funny.

You’re French franchie.
You vex yourself.

Now go away you Socialist, Imperialist scum.

prout !

you even can’t read words for what they mean

Take seriously anything you say?
lol

what you yourself write is gospel, but exclusively for you

Well duh.
Why would I write for a Socialist like you?
We agree on nuthin.
Now go away.

again you changed my sentence meaning

t’es trop tordu pour être honnête

choose your qualification

http://www.wordreference.com/fren/fourbe

As I said franchie, you vex yourself.

ça m’est complètement égal, tu me fais marrer !

vex Dei vex populo

Yeah…yeah…
Hey… Share with us what it’s like to live in a country where every decision you make, and now every thought you have, is a mistake.

Sully open your eyes, you are doomed and you don’t want to acknowledge it !

your financial system and your economy are worn out !

p’tête que vous avez abusé de l’effet Cantillon

http://www.eauli.net/decouvrir/mots/effet_cantillon.htm

et l’heure est maintenant aux coups de fouets !

http://www.re-define.org/sites/default/files/Sony%20Kapoor%20A%20stock%20take%20of%20the%20ongoing%20financial%20reform%20discussion-Re-DefinePP.pdf

So…. that’s a “no” then?
lol

go away franchie

no need

you’re vex Dei

I don’t find you ‘vexing’ franchie.
I find you disingenuous.
And unable to assemble a coherent thought on your own.
I mostly attribute that to your Socialist indoctrination…. it’s similar to the thought processes,such as they are, of our own ‘leftists’.

yeah, it’s written in your clingling Bible, too bad it only concerns your sect, and has no chance to become a republican principle

tiens bizarre, dès que je cling le mot “secte”, le post est parti dans les abysses

Sully, tu es transparent pour moi, toi et ton “thought process”, ou tu es réellement naif et endoctrinné, ou tu es vraiment un pervers frustré