A Message Or A Manipulation?: A “Cascade Of Boos” As Ron Paul Announced CPAC Winner

February 20th, 2010 (24) Posted By Pat Dollard.

100220_ron_paul_ap_lede

Just who voted, and why?

Politico:

Rep. Ron Paul, the libertarian-leaning Texas Republican who ran a quixotic bid for the Republican presidential nomination in 2008, was the top vote-getter in the Conservative Political Action Conference’s straw poll, capturing the support of 31 percent of those who participated in the contest.

Former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, who had won the CPAC straw poll for three consecutive years, took 22 percent of the vote. Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin won 7 percent and Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty 6 percent. Pawlenty attended the conference; Palin did not.

Paul’s victory renders a straw poll that was already lightly contested among the likely 2012 GOP hopefuls all but irrelevant as the 74-year-old Texan is unlikely to be a serious contender for his party’s nomination.

As the results were displayed on twin large screens in the ballroom – and even before Republican pollster Tony Fabrizio could announce who won – a cascade of boos came down from a crowd that views Paul and his fervent supporters as an irritant. Paul’s backers responded with cheers, though, when their candidate was then proclaimed by Fabrizio as the winner.

CPAC organizers were plainly embarrassed by the results, which could reduce the perceived impact of a contest that was once thought to offer a window into which White House hopefuls were favored by movement conservatives.

A spokesman for the conference rushed over to reporters following the announcement to make sure they had heard the unmistakable boos when the screen first showed Paul had won the straw poll.

Rep, Mike Pence, an Indiana Republican who heads the House GOP conference, took 5 percent of the vote. Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich and former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee each won 4 percent.

2,935 votes were cast in the straw poll, the most in the history of the 37-year conference, but a fraction of the approximately 10,000 people who attended CPAC.

By finishing well above Palin and Pawlenty, Romney clearly remains well-positioned among the sort of conservative activists who attend such conferences as CPAC. Having already sought his party’s presidential nomination once, and retaining many of the supporters he had in 2008, Romney enters the early going of the 2012 race as something close to a frontrunner.

But the results of the straw poll, though imprecise, indicate that conservatives are not entirely happy with the field of likely candidates mentioned two years before the first balloting.

Fifty-three percent of those who participated in the contest said they wished the GOP had a better field of candidates. Forty-six percent said they were satisfied with those now seen as possible presidential candidates.

While Palin’s decision not to attend the conference may have impacted her single-digit showing, her modest finish underscores the degree to which she is not seen as a serious presidential contender by the most attuned activists in her own party.

Even though he and his aides sought to downplay the poll, Pawlenty’s finish represents a disappointment for the 2012 Republican who has worked the most aggressively in the last year to make a name in party circles. Besides Romney, Pawlenty is the only potential candidate with the makings of a campaign infrastructure.

But given Paul’s win and the minimal effort made to contest the straw poll by the mainstream candidates – unlike in years’ past there was no campaigning by them to rally support – the results don’t offer the window onto the organizational strength of the hopefuls offered by past polls.

Forty-eight percent of those who participated in the contest indicated that they were students and the divergent reaction to the results reflected the outcome.

When Paul was announced as the winner, his many college supporters erupted in the corridors outside the ballroom, yelling, jumping and chanting their candidate’s name.

“We came here a long way to support Ron Paul and the Campaign for Liberty,” said Jeremy Henchlifee, a student at Central Connecticut State University.

Other conservatives, though, voiced their frustration at Paul’s showing.

“I understand their passion, but he’s not the leader of the conservative movement,” said California Republican Phil Jennerjahn, who is mounting an uphill congressional run in the 33rd District.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • http://avideditor.wordpress.com/ avideditor
  • Sully

    LGF = LMAO
    Kos has more cred….and that’s nil

  • Phil Byler

    CPAC is in trouble if Ron Paul really won the straw poll. While Ron Paul is good on domestic issues, he is no national security conservative — quite the opposite. On foreign policy and national security matters, Ron Paul fits well with the hard core leftists. Ron Paul blames us for the radical Islamist war on us.

    • John

      He follows the Constitution…

      There is no declared war. Ron Paul is right…
      Terror is a tactic, not an enemy. Ron Paul is right…
      The Federal Reserve is unconstitutional and you cant have a free market with one. Ron Paul is right…
      The IRS is unconstitutional and SCOTUS has ruled so a dozen times that income tax is unconstitutional… Ron Paul is right…

      The military’s job is not nation building, what W ran on in 2000… Ron Paul is right…

      Ron Paul is the only one who should be the choice…

      We have been in perpetual war since the Federal Reserve has come to be… Pre-emptive war is an indicator of pre-emptive arrest for ideas against the state… Ron Paul is right…

      We are getting close to an endgame and most will wonder how we got here… WAKE UP please…

    • Reloader449

      Those ideas ALL sound great, John- truly American. We just need SOMEONE ELSE to be the banner-carrier for them.

    • Phil Byler

      Excuse me, but we are at war with al Qaeda and its radical allies. I have never been a fan of the “war on terror” phrase because terrorism is a tactic, not an enemy. But we do have an enemy. Obama formally declared war on America twice in the 1990′s. As the 9-11 Commission stated, before 9-11, they were at war with us but we weren’t at war with them. On 9-11, more Americans died than at Pearl Harbor. Congress then passed AUMF. Contrary to Ron Paul, we are not to blame for the radical Islamists attacking us. Radical Islamists hate us for our freedom.

      Pre-emptive war since the Federal Reserve? John, I think you need to learn some history. WWI was started by a German invasion on the Western Front. WWII was started in Europe by a German invasion of Poland and in the Pacific by Japan attacking us at Pearl Harbor (after years of aggression in China). The Korean War was started by the North Koreans invading the South. The Vietnam War was started by the Communists not living by the 1954 treaty. The first Gulf War was started by Saddam invading Kuwait, and the first President Bush sought and obtained congressional approval. The removal of Saddam occurred after Saddam violated 17 U.N. arms resolutions since the first Gulf War and had used nerve gas against the Kurds and after at the second President Bush’s request, Congress authorized the use of force with 22 stated causes of war.

      As for the federal income tax being unlawful, John, you might check out the Amendments to the U.S. Constitution. One is addressed to authorizing the federal income tax.

    • Phil Byler

      Correction to the third line in the first paragraph: “Obama” should read “Osama.”

      I am no fan of Obama, and his one time radical friends did declare their own war on America. But I should still correct that it was Osama who on behlaf of al Qaeda, declared war on America in 1996 and 1998.

  • Tom in CO

    There hasn’t been an online poll ron paul can’t win. Except for the actual voting polls.

    He stands no chance! :beer: :beer: :beer:

    • thrasymakhos

      Ron freaking Paul can’t win. All he will do is succeed in helping Obama win. Look at Ross Perot. He was “a hand grenade with a bad hair cut.” 20 million people voted for him. Bill Clinton won and we had his sorry ass for 8 freaking years! Ron Paul is right about a lot of things up to the point he runs of the rails which is very early in any conversation he has. Paulbots…you don’t live in the era of Rutherford B. Hayes. We can’t hide behind our oceans anymore.

  • political.fish

    Ron Paul and his frenetic group-think tools have attempted to infiltrate and direct the grassroots resistance to push their own idiotic agenda. I want no part of him or his organization. He is more a part of the problem than a remedy for it.

    • John

      Republicans infiltrate and direct the grassroots resistance to push their own idiotic agenda.

      There fixed it for you.

    • political.fish

      As I said, frenetic tool.

    • thrasymakhos

      :lol: :beer:

  • dave m

    A vote for Ron is a vote for Soros.
    Obama would ROTFLHAO
    In 2008 Ronnie won every poll that could be fixed.
    Don’t draw any conclusions this is just BS.

  • mark gibbons

    he raised quiute a bit of money in his last go at becoming somebody. just goes to show money can’t buy him love from the voters. maybe he can take his sheep out for dinner. how is crow?

    • John

      More money from military than all other candidates combined x2…

    • political.fish

      Perhaps, but once they determined his level of idiocy they voted in overwhelming numbers for McCain.

  • http://touchstonesjests.blogspot.com/ TouchStone

    @john & the other paulbots:

    Let’s say we just pick up all our toys and bring ALL the troops back from overseas – as of yesterday.

    What then, geniuses?

  • ji

    I like R.P.
    But only if he doesnt run for Prez.

  • Tyler520

    “There is no declared war. Ron Paul is right…”
    This statement is a misnomer – period.

    “Terror is a tactic. Ron Paul is right…”
    Who the fuck cares–what kind of point is that?

    Ron Paul is also a raging racist…is he still right about that, too?

  • Lock and Load

    “Forty-eight percent of those who participated in the contest indicated that they were students and the divergent reaction to the results reflected the outcome.

    When Paul was announced as the winner, his many college supporters erupted in the corridors outside the ballroom, yelling, jumping and chanting their candidate’s name.”

    Sounds like a bunch of idealistic young zealots, who have yet to get out of school and face the real world. It seems like a lot of Paul’s ideas would appeal to that type of individual – perhaps one day they will WAKE UP and join the rest of us on planet reality :roll: :???:

  • Reloader449

    This was a successful communist tactic- screw the heads of young people in school, force universal suffrage, and lower the voting age.

    It puts “voters” with the attitudes/experience/outlook of ten year old girls in charge of the greatest nation ever.

    We’re so fucked.

  • http://patdollard.com Average Joe

    I mention Charles Johnson of LGF only because I have to….But in 07-08, Ron Paul proved HE IS THE BIGGEST FUCKING JOKE ever in politics, which is why LGF always had a joke punchline as doing a Ron Paul for screw ups by the candidates.

  • Turtleherder

    Ron Paul
    To quote the great Barney Fife…
    “I think he’s a nut”!