Crazy Alabama Bitch Put In Range Time Before Shooting

February 15th, 2010 (17) Posted By Pat Dollard.

Ala University Shooting

HUNTSVILLE, Ala. (AP) – The husband of an Alabama professor accused of fatally shooting three colleagues said Monday that the couple went to a shooting range recently, but that he didn’t know where she got the gun she used for practice that day.

James Anderson told The Associated Press that his wife, Amy Bishop, didn’t do anything unusual in the days before Friday’s shooting. Bishop, a Harvard-educated neurobiologist, is accused of pulling a gun at a faculty meeting and shooting six people, three fatally. Two of the survivors remained in critical condition Monday.

Anderson said he knew his wife had a gun, but didn’t know when or how she got it.

“I really don’t know how she got it, or where she got it from,” he said in an interview at his home.

Police have previously said Bishop had no permit for the gun they believe she used in the shooting, and investigators said they didn’t know where she got it. It’s not clear if that was the same gun that her husband knew about.

Bishop’s husband said nothing unusual happened on their trip to the shooting range, and that she didn’t reveal why she took an interest in target practice. Nothing in her behavior before the shooting foreshadowed the violence last week, either, he said.

“She was just a normal professor,” he said.

Investigators haven’t commented on a possible motive, but Bishop was vocal among colleagues about her displeasure over being denied tenure by the university, forcing her to look for work elsewhere after this semester.

On Monday, some victims’ relatives were questioning how Bishop was hired at the university in 2003 after she was involved years ago in separate criminal probes. University of Alabama in Huntsville officials were meeting privately to review the files concerning her hiring.

In 1986, Bishop shot and killed her 18-year-old brother with a shotgun at their Braintree, Mass., home. She told police at the time that she had been trying to learn how to use the gun, which her father had bought for protection, when it accidentally discharged.

Authorities released her and said the episode was a tragic accident. She was never charged, though current Braintree police Chief Paul Frazier questions how the investigation was handled. Frazier said she also fired once into a wall before hitting her brother, then fired a third time into the ceiling.

Her husband said Monday he had known about her brother being shot, but said “it was an accident. That’s all I knew about it.”

In another incident, The Boston Globe reported that Bishop and her husband were questioned by investigators looking into a pipe bomb sent to one of Bishop’s colleagues, Dr. Paul Rosenberg, at Children’s Hospital Boston in 1993. The bomb did not go off, and nobody was ever charged.

Anderson defended himself and his wife as innocent people questioned by investigators casting a wide net. He said the case “had a dozen people swept up in this and everybody was a subject, not a suspect.”

“There was never any indictment, arrest, nothing, and then everyone was cleared after five years,” he said.

Huntsville police spokesman Sgt. Mark Roberts said his department didn’t find out about either of the older cases until after the shooting on campus. He said police were checking with law enforcement to confirm details of the pipe bomb probe.

Sylvia Fluckiger, a lab technician who worked with Bishop in the early 1990s, said Bishop had been in a dispute with Rosenberg shortly before the bombs were discovered, though she didn’t know the nature of the disagreement.

“It was common knowledge,” she said Sunday.

It was not clear Monday if UAH spoke with Rosenberg when it hired Bishop, an associate professor whose research led to an innovative cell incubator now being developed for market by a private company, Prodigy Biosystems, that employs her husband.

Sammie Lee Davis, whose wife, Maria Ragland Davis, was killed in the shooting, expressed concern that UAH hired someone with a past like Bishop’s.

“This is all new to us,” he said of her past.

The slain professor’s two stepdaughters said they were shocked that Bishop was hired.

“I think they need to do a little more investigation when coming down to hiring teachers and things like that. Maybe looking a little deeper into their past about certain things. This is a lot coming out … It’s a shocker,” said Melissa Davis on ABC’s “Good Morning America.”

University of Illinois law professor Matthew Finkin said that because Bishop wasn’t charged with a crime before, the fatal shooting and pipe bomb cases would not have shown up on most background investigations.

“I don’t see what the institution (UAH) could have done,” said Finkin, who recently co-wrote a paper on the subject for the American Association of University Professors.

He said there are more extensive and expensive types of background checks that might have turned up those incidents.

“But we normally don’t do those for a reason and a respect for privacy. They are very invasive,” Finkle said. “You can’t function in an atmosphere of suspicion.”

Bishop is charged with one count of capital murder, which can lead to a death sentence in Alabama if convicted, and three counts of attempted murder.

Killed were Gopi K. Podila, the chairman of the Department of Biological Sciences, and professors Adriel Johnson and Davis. Two of the wounded—professor Joseph Leahy and staffer Stephanie Monticciolo—were in critical condition Monday. The third, Luis Cruz-Vera, had been released from the hospital.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • RexRedbone

    A statment by the League of Prince Valiant Hair Cuts has revoked Amy Bishops membership card.Buster Brown CEO said had we known how fucked up this Bitch was her ass would have been kicked to the curb.We cannot not have members killing people in cold blood.Well noted and most unstable Emo Philips stated and they call me Fucked up :beer: :beer:

  • Ivan the Kafir

    Just so it’s absolutely clear: guns don’t kill people, people kill people. Let them find a way but they will do it. I’m sure Cain didn’t have a 1911 when he killed Abel.

  • Bobby E

    So, she didn’t just snap and go postal (or professorial, if you will), but planned. That would be premeditated and would not qualify for a guilty by reason of insanity defense … although it seems as if she could be insane with the prior act of killing her brother.

  • SgtJenz

    If the wife shows up at the gun range with a pistol the husband didn’t know about, seems the logical question would be “where did ya get it?”, especially given her past.

    Something stinks in this entire mess.

    • Tim Roesch

      It might be interesting to see what she was working on as a ‘neurobiologist’. Also, where did she get her grants.

      Me thinks I smell a potential rotten fish carcass.

  • http://www.dirtydozensbunker.com Sanders

    A Unabomber wannabe.

  • richwill

    Apparently Bishop is unstable and the knowledge that she had been denied tenure put her completely over the edge. I have knowledge from a reliable source that denial of tenure in academia is much akin to a death sentence. The profess r becomes, literally, unemployable. I write this not to excuse Bishop, but to add some understanding to the situation.

    • Xavier

      “I have knowledge from a reliable source that denial of tenure in academia is much akin to a death sentence. The profess r becomes, literally, unemployable. I write this not to excuse Bishop, but to add some understanding to the situation.”

      I understand completely…she was such a bad teacher that even the liberal ‘lower the bar’ education system rejected her as being capable to tow the party line, so she went ape shit. :lol:

  • TerryTate

    On Monday, some victims’ relatives were questioning how Bishop was hired at the university in 2003 after she was involved years ago in separate criminal probes.
    ——————————————————-

    Yeah, that’s funny, I was thinking the same thing about William Ayers, Obama’s terrorist buddy, and now college professor.

    Small world.

  • Mike_W

    “I really don’t know how she got it, or where she got it from, except maybe that gun shop we visited together last week while discussing people we’d most like to blow away.”, he said in an interview at his home.

    Police have previously said Bishop had no permit for the gun they believe she used in the shooting, and investigators said they didn’t know where she got it. It’s not clear if that was the same gun that her husband knew about.

    Bishop’s husband said nothing unusual happened on their trip to the shooting range, apart from his wife’s head spinning ’round and ’round and screaming obsenities about frickin tenure and she’d show those frickin bastards what’s what, and that she didn’t reveal why she took an interest in target practice apart from visualizing exactly where she was gonna put a bullet through those bitches. Nothing in her behavior before the shooting foreshadowed the violence last week, either, he said .. apart from the disemboweled pets.

    “She was just a normal professor, blowing up Professors who won’t toe the line and blowing the innards out of those who don’t show enough respect, like her brother” he said.

    • RexRedbone

      Only after finding out who on the Tenure panel those memebers that said no became tagets.Emo Philips in a press conferance last night stated that The bitch is not related to me Thank God :beer: :beer:

    • Tim Roesch

      This is very suspicious.

      Who is this ‘husband’ and what does he do for a living?

      If I had a few tens of thousands of dollars lying around I would hire a PI to investigate this.

      She was supposedly denied tenure previous to this job.

  • Nanny

    Ironically the husband works for a company that is building some sort of gizmo that was developed by the professor who was the target of the bomb attack that Bishop and her husband were investigated for. How weird is that?

    I agree – this whole shooting and these two people are indeed very suspicious.

  • Tim Roesch

    From my quick research Prof. Bishop was working on the effects of NO (yes, laughing gas) on nerve cells.

    Apparently there is evidence that chronic use of NO can cause violent behavior, brain damage and a host of other interesting maladies.

    Could Amy be a victim of her own research? Could she have been experimenting on herself? Was she a premature baby upon whom NO was used to increase O2 levels in her body past under developed lungs?

    hmmmmm

    More to follow…

    • Tim Roesch

      This blog suggests that Amy was merely a fraud.

      http://afamilyofshepherds.blogspot.com/2010/02/is-accused-murderer-dr-amy-bishop.html

      It is possible that Amy was nothing more than an uncovered huckster who went bezerk upon discovery.

      If this is true then my entire premise is, well, pseudo intellectual I suppose…

      But what about the maxim ‘follow the money’. Where did the Bishops get the money to continue this fraud?

      And, still, there is a great deal of interesting work out there linking NO and violence.

      And what do we have here?

      I am interested in the enablers. Who enabled this woman? And why?

  • Steve Rogers

    She’s a barking moonbat!

    http://www.bostonherald.com/news/regional/view.bg?&articleid=1232943&format=&page=1&listingType=Loc#articleFull
    From the article:
    “(Bishop)…was a far-left political extremist who was “obsessed” with President Obama to the point of being off-putting.”

  • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

    This is proof positive, Liberal support death panels.