Home  »  General  »  Miracle Energy Cell Or Green Hoax?

Miracle Energy Cell Or Green Hoax?



Feb 24, 2010 17 Comments ›› Erik Wong

bloom-energy-fuel-cell

FOX News:

At a press conference Wednesday, Silicon Valley startup Bloom Energy showed off its new, heavily hyped technology, which harnesses chemical reactions to create energy. The company’s mission: to revolutionize the world’s fuel sources.

Bloom’s main product is the Bloom Energy Server, a generator based around a smart new fuel cell technology. Fuel cells rely upon chemical reactions to generate energy rather than fossil fuels, and as such are considered cleaner, more affordable, and more reliable than the traditional energy sources.

Fuel cell technology has been under development for decades, primarily concentrating on chemical reactions using hydrogen — an element that can be volatile and difficult to store. Bloom’s fuel cell technology is fundamentally different, running on a wide range of renewable or traditional fuels.

The technology has roots in NASA’s Mars space program, where Dr. KR Sridhar, principal co-founder and CEO of Bloom Energy, was charged with building technology to help sustain life on Mars. His mandate: Use solar energy and water to produce air to breath and fuel for transportation.

Sridhar’s invention converts air and nearly any fuel source — ranging from natural gas to a wide range of biogases — into electricity via a clean electrochemical process, rather than dirty combustion. Even running on a fossil fuel, the systems are approximately 67% cleaner than a typical coal-fired power plant, explains Bloom. When powered by a renewable fuel, the company’s Energy Server can be 100% cleaner. Each Energy Server consists of thousands of Bloom’s fuel cells, flat, solid ceramic squares made from a common sand-like “powder.”

Bloom Energy states that to date, Bloom Energy Servers, currently in deployment for several Fortune 500 companies, have produced more than 11 million kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity, with CO2 reductions estimated at 14 million pounds.

The technology industry breathlessly watched and waited for Wednesday’s unveiling. John Doerr, a partner at investment firm Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers and Bloom Energy board member, shared in the hype.

“For years, there have been promises of new energy solutions that are clean, distributed, affordable, and reliable; today we learn that Bloom, formerly in stealth, has actually delivered,” he said. “Americans want clean, affordable, energy, 24×7 — and all the jobs that go with it. Bloom’s boxes are a breakthrough, serving energy, serving demanding customers, and serving our country.”

The company’s customers seem to echo Doerr’s enthusiasm, many of which are leading businesses. Coca-Cola, Cox, eBay, FedEx, Google, Staples, and more have been running the Energy Servers.

Coke’s 500kW installation at its Odwalla plant in Dinuba, CA, will run on re-directed biogas and is expected to provide 30% of the plant’s power needs while reducing its carbon footprint by an estimated 35%.

“This new fuel cell technology has great promise and represents an important step for Coca-Cola in continuing to grow our business without growing the carbon footprint,” said Brian Kelley, President and General Manager, Coca-Cola North America. He noted that the Bloom Servers can help the company reduce carbon emissions while improving efficiency and using cleaner forms of energy.”

In a video shown at the event, California Senator Dianne Feinstein, Cypress Semiconductor CEO T.J. Rogers, New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg and others raved about the new innovation.

Mayor Bloomberg said he was excited from the first time he saw the technology in action: “My first reaction was this was a company guaranteed for greatness.”

“When we look at Bloom Energy,” he added, “we are looking at the future of business, at the future of the economy, at the future of America.”


  • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

    Yes, isn’t this lovely – only problem; it’s not a perpetual energy machine. Right now, the costs are about $800K per unit and currently don’t appear to be scalable for home use (although that might be possible). But, couple that with the fact it needs Natural Gas as a fuel and we’re right back in that same old boat – we are still relying on fossil fuels for energy (and I might add an energy the Green Obongo Government doesn’t seem to interested in tapping). With the price being what it is, only the government, utilities and Fortune 500 companies can afford such.

    But have no fear, the government will come to the rescue of Bloom Energy with huge cash incentives (paid for by taxpayers) to start implementing them. Our savior has arrived, but he’s wearing a ski mask and holding a chrome plated 9mm.

  • DC

    Oh, I get it!

    Stare at the black line between the black and green boxes for 30 seconds, then close your eyes.

    What do you see?

    That’s right……..NOTHING!……. :lol:

    • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

      You need to look for a longer period of time. If you stare for 60 seconds, Al Gore will magically appear.

    • DC

      …..And if you stare at it for 120 seconds, you’re nuts!

  • mark gibbons

    follow the money.

  • mike3481

    To me reading the phrase “carbon footprint” is like hearing fingernails on a blackboard.

    :gun: :evil:

  • ZenDraken

    Any alternative energy technology that requires government subsidies to be marketable is not an energy source, it is an energy *drain*. A true energy *source* is able to compete in the market with other non-subsidized energy sources.

    Every silicon solar photovoltaic panel is a net energy drain. Manufacturing it requires melting silicon, which is effectively melting rock. It takes a *lot* of energy to melt rock. A solar panel will never produce as much energy over it’s service life as it took to manufacture, therefore it’s a net energy drain.

    Looking at it another way: Were we to convert all electric generation in the US to solar photovoltaic, we would have to import oil in order to generate enough electricity to manufacture the necessary solar panels.

    Of course, this could change with advances in solar technology.

    Great source on energy in general: Some Energy Fundamentals

  • Citizen K

    Since they are not mass produced it is like owning a giant computer from the 60′s which was as powerful of 386 PC.

    Actually, I’ve checked into it and it does show possibilities.

    The big problem is what will any small contaminants like the mercaptans put into your home natural gas to make it smell to find a leak which could poison the coats and severely lessen their lifespan. Contaminants can be a big problem with catalytic desulfurizing reactors in refineries.

    Should the lifespan really be 20 years, and the cost is anywhere near the projected $3000 I’m buying one right away.

    • Citizen K

      Sorry, if the lifespan be 10 years and they cost $10,000 each, then I’m getting one right away.

  • 0311inOHio (I didn’t drink the kool-Aid)

    Right this very minute… Whoopee – fucking do!!!

    But I got to think back to when I was a kid and reading Dick Tracy comic strip when he used to talk on his “wrist phone” and we still had “party lines”. You old farts will know what I am talking about.

    http://www.gocomics.com/dicktracy/

    We have come a long way baby.

  • CPLViper

    You know what … I have a great idea …

    Take all the inmates in prisons, put their dumb asses on stationary bikes hooked to freakin’ alternators for 16 hours per day. Presto … free, instant energy. I say its free because we are already paying for their food and sheltor … well maybe more like a value add. We might as well get something for our investment in their “rehabilitation”. Anyway, we will either solve the energy problem or the crime problem.

    • Bugger

      Amen to that !

    • Xavier

      :mrgreen:

    • Minuteman01

      They could at least power their own jails and prisons! Save millions!!!

    • CPLViper

      Screw them … they can pedal in the dark. :twisted:

  • Autumn

    Seriously people?! Why is every so intent on being angry and soooo short sited. So what it’s not ready to go right now. So what that it’s not super marketable right this second. As you pound away on the computer keys, you should think back to how UNMARKETABLE computers were when first introduced. NOW, they are cost effective and all of us have at least ONE!! Maybe before you have another brilliant complaint, you should think about it for a few minutes. Be insightful!!

  • Susan Tenofsky

    This is only the beginning of the hoax of Green Theme paybacks.