Home  »  General  »  Disney Screws 3 Million Households Out Of Oscars

Disney Screws 3 Million Households Out Of Oscars



Mar 7, 2010 12 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Disney Cablevision
Bob Iger, president and CEO of the Walt Disney Company

NEW YORK (AP) – Cablevision subscribers were scrambling Sunday to hook up antennas or find live TV on the Internet in order to watch the Academy Awards after ABC’s parent company Walt Disney Co. switched off its signal in a dispute over fees.

The standoff affected 3.1 million subscribers to Cablevision Systems Corp. in parts of New York, New Jersey and Connecticut.

In dueling statements, the companies traded blame for the standoff ahead of one of the most-watched nights of television. It was the first time in a decade that a major broadcast station went dark in a dispute with a cable company.

“Cablevision has once again betrayed its subscribers,” said Disney spokeswoman Charissa Gilmore. “Cablevision pocketed almost $8 billion last year, and now customers aren’t getting what they pay for … again.”

Cablevision said the stall in negotiations should be blamed on Disney CEO Bob Iger. “It is now painfully clear to millions of New York area households that Disney CEO Bob Iger will hold his own ABC viewers hostage in order to extract $40 million in new fees from Cablevision,” said Charles Schueler, a Cablevision executive vice president.

ABC said in a statement Sunday afternoon that it has sent Cablevision a new proposal and is awaiting a response. “The ball is in their court,” said WABC-TV general manager Rebecca Campbell.

No details on the new proposal were provided, and Disney and Cablevision representatives did not return calls seeking comment.

ABC’s signal can still be pulled from the air for free with an antenna and a new TV or digital converter box. But Cablevision customers fumed over being the losers in a fight between two corporations.

“It’s not fair,” said Ranee Gaynor, who said Cablevision is the only cable provider available in her Bronx neighborhood. “We don’t have a choice.”

Gaynor said she would try to watch Sunday night’s Academy Awards show on the Internet. “Either that or go to someone’s house in Manhattan,” she said.

Juliana Mapson of Brooklyn said she might try to hook up an antenna before the show started.

“What can I do?” she asked. “I don’t understand why they couldn’t come to some conclusion.”

The dispute is another example of how networks are struggling to find profits as advertising revenue dwindles and programming costs grow. Networks are transmitted freely over the airwaves, but expensive event programming has led the companies behind them to increasingly demand fees from cable TV and satellite operators for retransmitting those signals.

Cablevision has argued that Disney is seeking an additional $40 million a year in new fees, even though the company pays more than $200 million a year to Disney.

Disney counters that Cablevision charges customers $18 per month for basic broadcast signals but does not pass on any payment for ABC to Disney.

The dispute is similar to a standoff at the end of last year between News Corp. and Time Warner Cable over how much Fox television station signals were worth. That tussle, which threatened the college football bowl season and new episodes of “The Simpsons,” was resolved without a signal interruption.

Francesco Benson, a Cablevision subscriber in Nutley, N.J., said he’s backing the company over ABC.

“There’s no reason they should charge $40 million to a cable service provider when it’s broadcast free over the air,” Benson said. He fears the extra charge will end up coming out of consumers’ pockets.

Some consumer groups are urging Congress and the Federal Communications Commission to step in and limit the ability of broadcasters to pull their transmissions off cable systems during contract disputes.

“The companies involved always try to leverage the big events and consumers are always caught in the middle,” said Art Brodsky, a spokesman for Public Knowledge, a nonprofit consumer advocacy group.


  • Mikey GaGa

    Cablevision are a family run company of douchebag libtards who are attempting to monopolize the media in this area. They also own that liberal snot rag Newsday.

  • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

    Walt Disney Corporation hasn’t been worth a shit since Walt died. Back when, you could count on Walt Disney for good family entertainment, but now; Nothing but Shit!

  • POD1

    Oscar = Gay Olympics gold medal.

  • Jim D

    The fix is simple. If the subscriber has to endure a nonstop barrage of mind numbing commercials there should be no subscriber fee! And as far as the oscars go who in the fuck cares!

  • CPLViper

    I was affected by the outage … well, that isn’t a completely true statement … as I really didn’t notice and really didn’t care.

    Disney upping the rates by 40 million for 3 million subscribers is like $13 per subscriber so either Cablevision would have to charge it back to subscribers or eat the loss. If they charged me $13 to (not) watch ABC, I would be a brand new satellite subscriber.

  • Ernest T. Bass

    I had reception….still didn’t see it. Didn’t want to.

  • josephus

    Good!
    Three million people not exposed to leftist propaganda.

    • richwill

      I agree. Disney did them a favor.

  • BradW (the Infidel)

    Title of article should be

    “Disney relieves 3 million households from more soicalist advertising”

    Have not had cable or dish for over 12 years.

    When I can sign up for Fox and other appropriate channels, maybe then.

    Until then I won’t send a dollar to the left leaning traitors

    • SgtJenz

      Wouldn’t it be great to have an alternative service that allowed you to sign on for only the channels you want?
      Who the fuck needs 250 or 500 channels when 99% of them are pure bullshit and you pay $60 or $70 a month for it??
      Sell your tv’s. Listen to radio or music. You can also rent movies to get your hi-def mojo workin’ if that’s your desire.

    • BradW (the Infidel)

      SgtJenz.

      100% agreement. Unfortunately, I doubt that will happen any time time, was tried in Ohio, and shot down, can’t remember why or how.

      I do suspect the hollyweird libs would be against it, and most likely have in all the contracts between teh cable channels and the cable and dish providers some language to help prevent them being dropped, or that certain channels have to be “packaged together”

      Another reason I won’t send my hard earned $$ to them.

      Until more of us vote with our wallets, not enough will change.

  • richwill

    I gave up TV about thirty years ago and have never missed it. I had a TV for VHS, and finally retired it.