Einstein Is On Your Ass

March 4th, 2010 (16) Posted By Pat Dollard.

nsa-spying

Wall Street Journal:

The Obama administration lifted the veil Tuesday on a highly-secretive set of policies to defend the U.S. from cyber attacks.

It was an open secret that the National Security Agency was bolstering a Homeland Security program to detect and respond to cyber attacks on government systems, but a summary of that program declassified Tuesday provides more details of NSA’s role in a Homeland program known as Einstein.

The current version of the program is widely seen as providing meager protection against attack, but a new version being built will be more robust–largely because it’s rooted in NSA technology. The program is designed to look for indicators of cyber attacks by digging into all Internet communications, including the contents of emails, according to the declassified summary.

Homeland Security will then strip out identifying information and pass along data on new threats to NSA. It will also use threat information from NSA to better identify emerging cyber attacks.

NSA’s role is a careful balance because of the political battles that ensued over the agency’s role in domestic surveillance in the George W. Bush administration. Declassifying details of the NSA’s role, in a program initially developed during the Bush administration and continued in the Obama administration, will likely ignite new debates over privacy.

The White House’s new cyber-security chief, Howard Schmidt, announced the move to declassify the program in a speech at the RSA conference in San Francisco–his first major public address since assuming the post in January. He said addressing potential privacy concerns was one of the ten initial steps he planned to take. “We’re really paying attention, and we get it,” he said.

janet-napolitano-rsa-2_600x376

CNET NEWS:

SAN FRANCISCO–Homeland Security and the National Security Agency may be taking a closer look at Internet communications in the future.

The Department of Homeland Security’s top cybersecurity official told CNET on Wednesday that the department may eventually extend its Einstein technology, which is designed to detect and prevent electronic attacks, to networks operated by the private sector. The technology was created for federal networks.

Greg Schaffer, assistant secretary for cybersecurity and communications, said in an interview that the department is evaluating whether Einstein “makes sense for expansion to critical infrastructure spaces” over time.

Not much is known about how Einstein works, and the House Intelligence Committee once charged that descriptions were overly “vague” because of “excessive classification.” The White House did confirm this week that the latest version, called Einstein 3, involves attempting to thwart in-progress cyberattacks by sharing information with the National Security Agency.

Greater federal involvement in privately operated networks may spark privacy or surveillance concerns, not least because of the NSA’s central involvement in the Bush administration’s warrantless wiretapping scandal. Earlier reports have said that Einstein 3 has the ability to read the content of emails and other messages, and that AT&T has been asked to test the system. (The Obama administration says the “contents” of communications are not shared with the NSA.)

“I don’t think you have to be Big Brother in order to provide a level of protection either for federal government systems or otherwise,” Schaffer said. “As a practical matter, you’re looking at data that’s relevant to malicious activity, and that’s the data that you’re focused on. It’s not necessary to go into a space where someone will say you’re acting like Big Brother. It can be done without crossing over into a space that’s problematic from a privacy perspective.”

If Einstein 3 does perform as well as Homeland Security hopes, it could help less-prepared companies fend o

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • http://none gzero

    In the name of security, all rights will be taken.

  • Sully

    Not a peep outta the idiot left.

  • vivi liberi o muori

    “Those that would forsake freedom for security, deserve neither.”

  • http://touchstonesjests.blogspot.com/ TouchStone

    Like I tell my teen-aged daughter:
    “Never put anything on the ‘Net that you wouldn’t want me to put on the tailgate of my truck.”

  • TerryTate

    And I had wondered why the internet had been acting weird lately….

  • Ty

    Every day George Orwell looks more and more like a genius.

    • richwill

      You stole my line, thanks.

    • Sully

      Many people think Orwell was writing about the Soviets.
      He wasn’t. He was writing about the Socialists of England.
      And yeah…he had their number.

  • karl marx responds

    So…. just hypothetically speaking (I’m not actually suggesting this), should someone post here that Obama is an anti-American pro-Muslim Marxist closely associated with Chicago thugs and domestic terrorists, would homeland security view that as a cyber attack? I hope so.

  • PatriotofPast

    Today we can Count what the Citizens have Lost Control of to the Govt…
    The Banking Industry, The Housing Industry, The Automotive Industry, The Education System, The Internet, and The Media (I guess they were willing partys to takeover).
    I do not know what the EPA will do to our fuel prices in the near future, but the 10 Million Acre land grab has me worried. We need to REALIZE our ENTIRE ECONOMY is now being run by a bunch of Communist Sympathisers, and they see a Utopia way different than our Founding Fathers. Whats the FIX? Elect REPLACEMENTS? Like a Tag Team wrestling match, they are ALL in on the Havoc.

    • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

      No, we are not run by Communist Sympathisers; We are being run by dyed in the wool Communists (Marxists, Socialists, Shitheadists (sic) – whatever you want to name them). All these mothefuckers in DC now are burned out hippies of the 60s who wanted to overthrow the government then, who have worked inside the system to overthrow it now as the leaders.

      As far as Utopia is concerned, they have no vision of creating a Utopian State whatsoever. Their vision is to create feudal system of the few ruling class supported by the many serfs. There has never been or ever will be a Socialist Utopia of any kind in the history of the world; there has always been a two class system of the many suffering and a few rolling in opulence.

    • Sully

      WTF?
      “two class system”?

    • mike3481

      Sully, he may mean one class of the ruling elite and their very wealthy supporters and then there’s everyone else in another class that’s either partially or totally dependent on Government for survival, thus eliminating the middle class including what’s considered the current upper-middle class whose net assets are less than 5-10 million dollars.

      The power of being able to control people is where their excitement in life is to be found.

      I hope all that made sense. :beer:

    • Sully

      Thanks mike…. but with the anti-corporate shit from earlier today that he never replied to and now generally deriding success in America as “rolling in opulence”, I’m not so sure.

      Just curious how that gels with being “a believer in free market economics” if you catch my drift. ;-)

  • GBU43

    Strong encryption is your friend.

    • falconfixer

      Strong encryption only makes them wonder what you are trying to hide.