Home  »  Economy  »  ObamaCare Hidden Provision Shocker: Without Your Permission Your Employer May Now Deduct $150-$240 A Month From Your Paycheck To Pay Obama’s Debts

ObamaCare Hidden Provision Shocker: Without Your Permission Your Employer May Now Deduct $150-$240 A Month From Your Paycheck To Pay Obama’s Debts



Mar 26, 2010 24 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

60860575-1

What’s the precise number of rounds should a man allow his children to be riddled with before he shoots back?

Fox News:

While Congress spent the last year debating how to provide health insurance for the uninsured, a little-known provision slipped into the heath care law that could cost some Americans upwards of $2,000 a year.

The Class Act, otherwise known as the Community Living Assistance Services and Support Act, is the federal government’s first long-term care insurance program.

Under-reported and the under the radar of most lawmakers, the program will allow workers to have an average of roughly $150 or $240 a month, based on age and salary, automatically deducted from their paycheck to save for long-term care.

The Congressional Budget Office expects the government will collect $109 billion in premiums by 2019.

Supporters say the program will relieve pressure on Medicaid and should help keep us out of nursing homes by enabling Americans to save for something most will eventually need — assistance in eating, bathing or dressing in their old age.

Opponents say the provision is little more than a short-term revenue fix that will eventually add to the federal deficit.

“This is a scary proposition where the government passed a huge new entitlement program with gimmicks and tricks and the American people don’t know they will be automatically enrolled in it by their employer if they don’t watch out,” said Rep. Devin Nunes (R-CA).

Nunes says Republicans were blindsided by the provision because they were unable to see the final bill until the very end. But Democratic supporters say the provision, which was championed by the late Sen. Ted Kennedy, should not be controversial.

“It promotes independence and choice for people who need long-term care, and over time it will help millions stay where they want to, which is at home,” says Jim Firman, director of the National Council on Aging.

Scheduled to go into effect in January, actual deductions could take place in 2012.

Here’s how the program will work:

– The federal government will approach employers next year about alerting workers to the proposed deduction.

– The deduction will work on a sliding scale based on age. Younger workers will be charged less, older workers more. The Congressional Budget Office pegged the average monthly deduction at $146. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services put it higher, at $240.

– After a five-year vesting period, enrollees who need help bathing, eating or dressing will be eligible to take out benefits, estimated to be around $75 a day for in-home care.

“Seventy-five dollars a day in flex cash will be enough for most people who are at home to stay at home, which is where they want to be,” Firman said. “We are convinced a cash benefit is the best way for consumer to get what they want.”

While the plan’s opponents don’t question the need for long-term care, they say the federal government should not be managing it, and they believe the program will eventually add to the deficit.

“This creates a whole new bureaucracy that is going to break this country,” Nunes said. “In the early years there will be money in it, but at the end of the day there won’t be enough money to cover the problems because there will be too many people in the program.”

The statute says the program is designed to be self-sustaining, with an advisory board to assure the fund remains solvent. But opponents say the fine print already tells another story. Unless modifications are made, according to a CBO analysis of the bill, “the program will add to future federal budget deficits in a large and growing fashion.”

Supporters and detractors admit much needs to be worked out, and eventually premiums will be based on how many Americans actually sign up for the insurance.


  • vanglock

    Just another slush fund that will be bankrupt by the time most workers are ready to retire.

  • rickl

    Yeah, I trust the government to save for my long-term care using deductions from my paycheck.

    Can you say “Social Security Trust Fund”?

    It’s gone beyond “kleptocracy”. We need a new word to describe this government. I propose “Vampirocracy”.

  • idi amin dada

    240 x 12 = $2880/yr. Thats 200B/yr. Thats only 20% of the shortfall. Hu$$ien really needs to be collecing $15,000/yr/worker to pay for this folly.

  • mike3481

    Tip of the iceberg, baby…

    Just the tip of the iceberg.

    (and something’s rolling downhill at the Dems :wink: )

  • Steele

    So there’s going to be this little “gem” of $150-$240 a month extra coming out of paychecks. Then there’s the additional taxes for the HC bill. And then if you don’t have insurance or an insurance policy that stands up to the HC bill, then you have to purchase insurance through the feds?

    So, that’s what? An extra $75-100 a week coming our of paychecks? Are these MORONS trying to turn us into a welfare country? Oh wait.. what am I saying?

    Middle class is going to end up being taxed to death and after all these little “hidden surprises”, will be lucky to make enough to put food on the table, but will make too much (pre-tax) to get any help.

    And why this extra money? Isn’t that what Social Security is suppose to be for? WTF is this BS??!?!?

    VOTE THESE MORONS OUT IN NOVEMBER!

  • http://1913intel.com -osgo-

    That is quite a price to pay for some LBFM nurse giving me a sponge bath….

  • Odin2012

    We are all ready taxes to death and beyond. This is just another way to bleed us. All in the name of socialism. Next is giving Pedro and his 10 kids entitlements and the right to vote. If we don’t make a stand… we won’t have anything to stand on. REVOLUTION!

  • John

    :cry:

  • Tom of Wales

    Keep pushing …sooner or later this will get ugly!!!

  • Odin2012

    Prepare for the coming break down.
    LEVEL THREE: Level Three comes when mass unrest or authoritarian crackdown causes disruption at state or regional level. Then, no matter what the original cause or location of the trouble, everyone in the region is affected. Effects might include travel restrictions, random ID checks, mass arrests, food and fuel rationing, controls on money and banking, roadblocks, and other harsh “emergency” restrictions.

    LEVEL FOUR: Level Four is Level Three—but on a national or even international scale. It’s martial law. If things ever get this bad, it’s likely that the government itself will be a far bigger threat to everyone’s well being than whatever the original cause of the clampdown was.

  • John

    We are at level three now…

    Think about it…

  • Rich C.

    :beer: :beer: :beer:

  • Xavier

    :beer:

  • DC

    I seriously doubt the government will be in any position at level 4 to do much about any civil unrest since they’ve already bled the country dry and have no more resources to use against us. When everybody is equal, there will be no jobs. No jobs…no taxes paid. No taxes paid…no government!

    Of course by that time, the US would be little more than a 3rd world country, barely scraping by and 80% of the population will have been plowed under by level 3!

    Either way, these scenarios are avoidable, but we’re all going to have to take a bite of that big shit sandwich!

  • http://rayrothfeldt.wordpress.com ray

    Time to buy more ammo. No way Obama actually let’s us win Congess in November. At that point, he’d simply declare an emergency and begin putting into effect those Kennedy era EO’s.

  • SC

    :beer: :beer: :beer: :gun: :gun: :gun:

  • falconfixer

    “The way to crush the bourgeoisie (middle class) is to grind them
    between the millstones of taxation and inflation.”
    Vladimir Illyich Lenin.

  • falconfixer

    The best way to destroy the capitalist system is to debauch the currency.

    Vladimir Lenin

  • AFITgrad86

    What ever happened to families caring for the elderly? Oh wait … Obama has no family (parents, siblings) so what does he know of the responsibility (oops sill me again) of caring for our parents as they cared for us as children?

    Jus my silly middle class values

  • Jon

    I am my employer, Bambi. Bite me.

  • Rene

    I hope Ted’s brothers are kicking his butt, out of heaven if he made it there.

  • The Sentinel at the Gate

    I sincerely hope the spheroidal object is brown in color.

  • political.fish

    What!!? LBFM spongebath!!? Maybe I should rethink my position.

  • Sponge

    You seriously think that unrepentant murderer ever even SNIFFED heaven?!?

    I would doubt that ANY Kennedy sniffs the promised land as they sold their family soul to the devil a few generations back.