Home  »  General  »  “Production Showed That Sanctions Have Failed”: Iran Begins Cruise Missile Production

“Production Showed That Sanctions Have Failed”: Iran Begins Cruise Missile Production



Mar 7, 2010 15 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

r1564261405-1
Nasr-1 cruise missiles are displayed during a ceremony to inaugurate its production line at an undisclosed location in Iran March 7, 2010.

TEHRAN (AP) — Iran announced Sunday it has started a new production line of highly accurate short-range cruise missiles, which would add a new element to the country’s already imposing arsenal.

Gen. Ahmad Vahidi, Iran’s defense minister, told Iranian state TV that the cruise missile, called Nasr 1, would be capable of destroying targets up to 3,000 tons in size.

The minister said the missile can be fired from ground-based launchers as well as ships but eventually would be modified to be fired from helicopters and submarines.

Western powers already are concerned about Iran’s military capabilities, especially the implications of its nuclear program. The United States and some of its allies, as well as the International Atomic Energy Agency, fear Iran is trying to produce nuclear weapons, a charge Iran denies.

The West is considering stiffer sanctions against Tehran to try to force it to halt uranium enrichment, a process that has civilian uses but also can be used for nuclear arms if the uranium is enriched more than 90 percent.

Iran also boasts an array of short- and medium-range missiles capable of hitting targets in the region, including Israel, U.S. military bases in the region and much of Europe.

Tehran frequently makes announcements about new advances in military technology that cannot be verified independently.

Gen. Vahidi said the production of the cruise missiles, which took two years to develop, showed that sanctions on Iran have failed. He said the cruise missiles would strengthen Iran’s naval power.

Cruise missiles are highly advanced, usually subsonic rocket-powered weapons that can hug the ground and hit targets with great precision. The United States used large numbers of cruise missiles in its attack on Baghdad in 2002, launching most of them from warships in the Persian Gulf.

Iranian state TV showed a video of boxes in a warehouse containing several missiles. It also showed footage of Iran’s cruise missile test in 2007. That missile was apparently imported.

Tehran began a military self-sufficiency program in 1992, under which it produces a large range of weapons, including tanks, missiles, jet fighters, unmanned drone aircraft and torpedoes.


  • http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_woU5s2fwbZo/Suf-jj0RiOI/AAAAAAABNxM/s4lTdhv4IhA/s400/Courage_Wolf_6_by_Nossek.jpg T-Bagg (Unapologetically American)

    I’m no expert, but those don’t look very cruise-y.

    • http://www.bootparkergriffith.com The Sentinel at the Gate

      These 4 look strangely like pre-production models to me. Those carts are way too flimsy to hold up missiles with fuel and/or a guidance system and warhead in them. And a red nose – looks like Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer. And where are the wings of these missiles as well? Unless this MF is cruising along at Mach 2, they will fall out of the sky without enough lifting surfaces on them to amount to anything.

    • TerryTate

      Hmm you are right T-Bagg, they certainly don’t look like a real cruise missile, more like a mock up meant to imply that they have cruise missiles, plus I was thinking those look just like the mold they use to make the condoms I use…

      :lol:

    • DC

      They have a relatively large diameter. I submit they are simply a launch shell for a cruise-type missle inside. After launching them either horizontally or vertically, the shell strips away or is jettisoned while the smaller internal cruise missle continues to it’s target.

      Of course…I could be wrong…..I’ve been wrong before……once!

    • Lone Wolf

      I thought I was was wrong once, but I was mistaken.

    • http://hyperinflation-watch.blogspot.com/ ZenDraken

      From Wikipedia: The Nasr-1 is reported to be based on a Chinese anti-ship missile (either TL-6 or C-704). Both Chinese missiles have a laughable 35km range, while the C-704 has an annoyingly small 130Kg warhead and the TL-6 has a wimpy little insignificant 35Kg warhead.

      On the other hand, a *real* cruise missile, the US Tomahawk BGM-109, has a 1000Kg warhead, and a range of 2500km.

      Tomahawk BGM-109: There Is No Substitute.

      Source:
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/TL-6
      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BGM-109_Tomahawk

    • Giorgi

      i think its a warhead and guidance part. the booster is not attached. otherwise, it looks like a Maverik with very small control wings. 10-15km range max.

  • Xavier

    They’re suppositories for Mr. Imadinnerjacket

  • Hawkerdriver (Pisson the Koran)

    Obama’s muzzie summit and dinnerjacket cruise missle display….hmmmn…What’s it gonna take?

    I worked for an outfit years ago whoose “godfather” openly,laughingly told the brass he was stealing them blind.They never did anything about it untill they had nothing left.

    Absolutly.Fucking.Incredible.

  • GRIZZ

    has ovomit apologized to iran yet?

  • hank

    REALLY ? Whats it gonna take to end this Bulls##t ?
    I suspect a “kosher” response.

  • vincenzo4

    Precisely what this administration aided and abetted. “…my muslim faith…”

  • AZPatriot

    Finally! Someone has found the 4 missing rounds to my nephews nerf gun! :lol:

  • uncla sam

    man, since when did Photoshop start making mock missles?… :roll:

    these iranians, boy those guys are jokers…douchbags.

  • Tyler520

    Silly Muslims, rocket science is for civilised society

    What’s up with Muslims and phallic rockets? These things look like archaic toys.

    I really hope something goes “terribly wrong” and they wipe themselves off the face of the planet so we do not have to deal with their $h!t anymore.