Home  »  General  »  U.S. Relations With Israel Hit “Crisis Of Historic Proportions”

U.S. Relations With Israel Hit “Crisis Of Historic Proportions”



Mar 15, 2010 8 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

jerusalem_697395a

Times Online:

The White House is refusing to back down today in a bitter dispute with Israel over settlements in Jerusalem that has stalled peace talks, split Jewish lobbyists in Washington and which the Pentagon believes is threatening the lives of American soldiers in the broader Middle East.

As Palestinians threatened to boycott future talks, the depth of the dispute was revealed when Michael Oren, Israel’s Ambassador to Washington, was quoted today warning that US-Israeli relations were “in their worst crisis since 1975 – a crisis of historic proportions”.

Still smarting over the announcement of new construction in East Jerusalem during the visit to Israel last week by Joe Biden, the US Vice-President, Hillary Clinton has called the move and its timing “insulting” towards the US.

Her remarks were echoed by senior White House officials at the weekend who spoke of Israel’s “affront” to Washington after Mr Biden’s effort to restart the peace process was sabotaged by the prospect of new Jewish settlements in districts claimed by

Binyamin Netanyahu, the Israeli Prime Minister, has apologised for embarrassing Mr Biden but has given no sign of ordering a halt to the project to build 1,600 new homes in Ramat Shlomo, an East Jerusalem neighbourhood conquered by Israel in 1967.

Mrs Clinton extracted the promise of a ten-month freeze on Israeli settlement-building from Mr Netanyahu last year.

Washington sees the construction project as a betrayal of trust, but the American response appears to have been doubly emboldened by an extraordinary briefing given to the Pentagon in January by the staff of General David Petraeus, the top-ranking US military officer in the Middle East and Central Asia.

A team of experts assembled by General Petraeus told Admiral Mike Mullen, the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, that Arab leaders were losing faith in America’s commitment to an Israeli-Palestinian peace deal; that the lives of US troops in Iraq and Afghanistan were ultimately at stake; and that George Mitchell, the White House special envoy to the Middle East, was “too old, too slow… and too late”.

Israeli media reported today that Washington is demanding that the Ramat Shlomo project be cancelled as a precondition for resuming peace talks.

There were also reports of American demands for further conciliatory gestures towards the Palestinians, including a release of prisoners and a promise that when negotiations restart they will cover all the fundamental questions still unresolved between the two sides, including the status of Jerusalem and the right of return of Palestinian refugees who lost their homes in 1948.

Senator Mitchell is due to return to the region this week to try to revive his plan for “proximity talks” between Mahmoud Abbas, the Palestinian President, and Israel.

The two sides have been negotiating directly for most of the past decade; it is a measure of their mutual mistrust since Mr Netanyahu’s return to power that despite Mr Mitchell’s best efforts over the past 14 months they have agreed only to negotiate through him.

Mr Netanyahu is due in Washington next weekend to attend the annual conference of the American-Israel Political Action Committee, the influential pro-Israel group, which today called on the White House to tone down its “very worrying” rhetoric.

There was little sign of that happening, as a delegation of left-leaning Jewish American activists visited the White House with a message of support for the Administration.

“We need a peace agreement to secure Israel and because it is an imperative US national security interest,” Amy Spitalnik of the J Street think-tank told The Times.

Echoing the concerns of General Petraeus, she added: “What we saw last week harms America’s credibility in the region. This conflict is being used as a propaganda tool by our real enemies in the region, especially Iran.”

Thomas Friedman, the influential New York Times columnist and occasional presidential golfing partner, had some trenchant advice for the Administration.

Instead of “fuming and making up” when wrongfooted by the announcement of new settlements, he wrote, Mr Biden should have “snapped his notebook shut, gotten right back on Air Force Two, flown home” and left a note telling Israel: “You have lost contact with reality”.


  • GRIZZ

    half black satan has traveled the world.
    Yet he cant set foot on the land of our only true ally in the middle east.
    FUBO

    • MinneSoCold

      Hmm… Curious isn’t it?

  • PUNISHER55

    We have no right to tell Isreal what they can do in their country . The Mooslums will never live in peace with anyone and unlike the retard in the white house Isreal knows it.

  • political.fish

    Mr. Netanyahu,

    You should at all costs unapologetically pursue the best interest of your Nation, and disregard any and all moronic hubris from this idiotic administration. I would suggest that the American people have a greater regard for you than they do for this set of ignorant assholes lead by Mr. Soetero. You can well be assured that we the American people will rid ourselves of this bane to both your and our national sovereignty as soon as practicable.
    Godspeed Sir,

    P.F.

  • http://Joshuapundit.blogspot.com Rob Miller

    This article has HUGE factual errors and omissions.

    The Israelis ‘ten-month freeze on Israeli settlement-building’ specifically did NOT include Jerusalem, and Netanyahu made that very clear at the time.

    As far as Petraeus’ supposed statement, I doubt Petraeus said this, simply because he’s not a stupid man.

    Israel building a few homes in its sovereign capital ( something they specifically said they were never going to halt anyway) is not going to stop the Taliban from killing Americans in AfPak, cause al-Qaeda to close up shop or the Iranians to end their quest for nukes, and only an idiot deficient in critical thinking or a deliberate liar would say so.

    The guy who wrote this tripe in Foreign Policy is Mark Perry, an ex-adviser to Yasir Arafat…now, there’s a responsible and unbiased source!

    Obama has been looking to pick a fight with Israel for some time now, and this was simply his excuse. And it also had the effect of covering for the Obama Administration’s non-policy on Iran. The Administration wants leverage to ensure that Israel will not take matters into its own hands regarding Iran’s nukes.

    The day after Biden left, the ‘Palestinian Authority’ held a ceremony in Ramallah to rename the main public square in honor of Dalal Mughrabi, the woman who in 1978 helped carry out a deadly terrorist attack that that left 38 Israeli civilians dead, 13 of them children as well as several Americans. Mahmoud Abbas was present, and he and his Fatah henchmen made speeches honoring Mughrabi.

    That’s something the White House didn’t see fit to condemn.

  • Lock and Load

    “a delegation of left-leaning Jewish American activists visited the White House with a message of support for the Administration…”
    :shock: What the hell kind of self-respecting Jew wants to support obambi and give their land to the muslim hoardes :?: :roll: Ah, they are left-leaning, which means they are godless fools who do not respect their history, and are not capable of learning from the many foolish giveaways that have served only to fuel the fires of muslim hatred against them :roll:
    As for Thomas Friedman, it is he and his media buddies and the obambi wrecking crew who have lost contact with reality… that reality being that islam intends to dominate this planet, and no deals will ever satisfy its demands to destroy Israel as a part of that plan. :evil: :evil: :???:

  • Odin2012

    It’s so amazing how Lord Obama has made the world, a much safer place….I really believe Obama is the anti-Christ. This beast will destroy our country, and the world. :gun: :gun:

  • David

    Some people want peace at any price. Some people want freedom, but will not pay the price [eternal vigilance]. I want peace and freedom and I will fight to secure it. I have been a quiet fiscal conservative and social libertarian for too long. Now I am angry as hell. How could a liberal like McCain secure the nomination of the former Republican party? How could W let spending get out of control? How could people who call themselves “republicans” take over congress and the White House and act like democrats? Answer: the desire for power and re-election. These are corrupting influences and if the politicians cannot control these impulses, then we need to impose term limits in the voting booth. If a politician wants my vote, I need to see him/her swear that he/she will not take money from lobbyists and will support and defend our Constitution.