“Houston, We Have A Problem”: Obama Ends Era Of US Supremacy In Space

April 16th, 2010 (19) Posted By Pat Dollard.

mikhael_subotzky_donkey1
Nasa’s newest spacecraft, the Obama 13

Times Online:

President Obama promised a delayed “leap into the future” for Nasa yesterday in a speech designed to quell a growing dispute over his cuts to manned space exploration, and to persuade critics that America will eventually put astronauts on Mars.

Despite cancelling Constellation, the $108 billion (more than £69 bn) programme that aimed to get astronauts to the Moon by 2020 and the Red Planet by 2030, he outlined a series of “stepping stone” destinations where Nasa will first seek a foothold in deep space using humans and robots.

A landing on Mars will come sometime after the mid-2030s — at least five years after the date Constellation aimed for — but Nasa will spend more time before then “looking at not just where we can go, but what we’re going to do when we get there.”

The President delivered his speech at the Kennedy Space Centre in Florida: “Nobody is more committed to manned spaceflight, to human exploration of space, than me. But we have got to do it in a smart way, we can’t just keep doing the same old things that we’ve been doing and thinking that somehow that’s going to get us to where we want to go.

“Step by step, we will push the boundaries,” he said, starting with a manned mission to land on an asteroid sometime beyond 2025 before venturing further into the cosmos to scout potential sites to establish fuel depots for future missions.

“By the mid-2030s, I believe we can send humans to orbit Mars and return them safely to Earth,” he continued, echoing words chosen by President Kennedy in his 1961 challenge to Nasa to put a man on the Moon. “A landing on Mars itself will follow, and I expect to be around to see it.”

The decision on how to get humans to such destinations will not be made for another five years. Instead, $3.1 billion will be spent researching new rocket technologies before a specific blueprint is selected for 2015. Orion, the spacecraft that was to have carried crews to the Moon by the end of the decade, will be salvaged from the Constellation plan — and sent to the International Space Station to be used in the event of an emergency, reducing America’s reliance on Russia’s Soyuz capsule.

Critics of Mr Obama’s plan, who include Neil Armstrong, the first man on the Moon, dislike it for its lack of detail and definite timeline and its failure to maintain human launch capabilities in the interim.

“The President has replaced one visionless plan with another,” said Senator Richard Shelby of Alabama. He said that the new plan “still ends human spaceflight” and added: “There is no rocket or capsule being built through this plan that can safely carry humans to space. The President commits to building a heavy-lift vehicle five years from now, at which point he may very well no longer be in office. It extends the International Space Station’s life by five years, yet we will have no way to reach it on our own.”

John McBride, a retired astronaut, told workers at a rally before the visit: “We need sufficient funding dedicated to space exploration. Back in Apollo days our space budget for Nasa was three to four per cent of the federal budget, today it’s less than one per cent.

“We have been told by our leaders that we can’t have it all. I say why not? If it costs a gazillion dollars to get to Mars, we get two gazillion back.”

A new world

1964 Exploration of Mars begins with Mariner 4, with no sign of water or life

2004 President Bush announces Nasa initiative to send humans to Mars after 2020

2005 Ice sheet detected by the European Mars Express gives strongest sign yet that life could exist

2008 Nasa’s Phoenix probe lands safely in the northern polar region of Mars

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • YERMOM

    couple of points….

    “But we have got to do it in a smart way, we can’t just keep doing the same old things that we’ve been doing and thinking that somehow that’s going to get us to where we want to go.”

    that’s rich considering everything this cockmuncher is trying has failed EVERY time it’s been tried before.

    and the image of donkeys with blinders on leading the cart through the wasteland is dreadfully prophetic

  • GRIZZ

    Somebody put a boot in this fags ass

  • GRIZZ

    Im not done.
    LAND ON A FUCKING ASSteroid.????REALLY.
    Land on a piece of space trash?
    WTF.
    How many people did NASA lay off?????

    I doubt this fuck could flush a turd

  • Odin2012

    Piece by piece Lord Obama tears this great country apart. Space was once our strongest achievements. He wants this country to be a third world country like his birth place Kenya. God, please stop this evil creature.

  • Bobby E

    Worry not … Zero’s ‘era of supremacy’ is going to endure a far, far shorter duration than our space program.

  • http://www.myspace.com/ssgduke ssgduke56

    Thanks Mr. President for dashing my Grandson dreams of becoming American Astronaut! Maybe my Grandson can become a Cosmonaut when the Russians and the Chinese take over…..

  • GRIZZ

    HAPPY BIRTHDAY BROTHER :beer: :beer: :beer: :beer:

    • http://patdollard.com Pat Dollard

      Thanks, man.

  • The Sentinel at the Gate

    And just how does this stupid mother fucker plan on getting NASA to Mars? Is he going to build a massive bungee system to slingshot a spacecraft with personnel into space and onto Mars?

    The prime reason the Aires program was selected as the vehicle to return to the moon was its success on getting man on the moon in the first place. NASA has pretty much had to drop back to the old Saturn V technology, built by the original rocket members. There has been absolutely no development of alternative space propulsion since the Saturn Program. Yes, there’s been concepts but no real solution – thus use the technology that you know.
    And now with the cancellation of Aries, we can forget ever getting off this planet.

    Reliance on industry to fund space exploration is absolutely insane; it takes too much money and no industry is going to pony up that much dough. Obongo talks about private space exploration successes, but he fails to mention that one venture was all about a large prize and most of the others are to launch money making communications satellites, much smaller in footprint that a manned system.

    Obongo’s ideas are without thought, reason and substance. Socialists have no need for space exploration because the are all about control of those on this planet and they can barely manage that.

  • thrasymakhos

    By the time Obama is done their won’t be any “private enterprise” left. He knows that. “What…me worry?”

  • ZenDraken

    We went from practically zero space experience to driving cars on the Moon in less than 10 years. Now we have to wait until 2015 just for a decision on a new launcher. And no mention of building an actual spacecraft to carry astronauts. This is pathetic.

    • thrasymakhos

      Zen,
      Obama voted….present.

  • Robert

    He probably wants to start launching turtles and worms into space like his mentor.

  • CPLViper

    I have mixed feelings on this. Anything is better in the private sector’s hands, eliminating NASA takes the control out of the governments hands and actually shrinks the government. I have to question the intents of BHO because he is not one to relinquish any power to ‘evil’ private companies. Oh yeah, the government will just regulate the shit out of it to keep control.

    Being in the private sector’s hands, space would have to produce revenue (and lots of it) on a continuous basis in order to even survive. Space exploration has given us tons in spin-off technology where information found in preparing or returning from missions is placed directly in the hands of the US military, then, if the information is useful, the military keeps it for some years. Later after the military is in it’s third or fourth version of whatever the technology produced, it is released to the public.

    That said, I am not sure if we should be going direct-to-market on any new technologies discovered from preparing for or executing space missions. I would not want the information being sent all over the earth between business partners … it is too easy to steal and sell to our enemies (although I think a lot of that crap is occurring now). The other issue is out-sourcing. Which companies will be allowed to operate within the United States, I would not want to rely on some Chinese company to put our defense satellites into orbit for us.

    I can see Boeing and Raytheon taking over for NASA but if the venture pans out and actually does create tons of cash as profit, I can guarantee you that there will be calls from the left that say the private industries are evil (not too far of stretch as they are already saying that now).

    So overall, I’ll take the following position; take the exploration part out of the hands of government and put it with the private sector with the caveat that the US military gets to review all data coming back first (note I said military and not Congress). Keep some ability to deploy vehicles into space in the hands of the military. Finally, limit the companies working in the US to US owned and operated companies.

    Lastly, do this transition slowly, do not cut NASA’s balls off and set private companies up for failure trying to scramble to pick up the pieces.

  • Lock and Load

    To think that some state-run media morons once compared obambi to JFK… :roll: JFK inspired to greatness, challenged the nation to be better, specifically with the space program, while this pretender seeks to drag America backward, punish success and reward slackers who do nothing to contribute :evil:
    He speaks about things of which he has no clue – you can’t get to Mars with existing technology, and by cancelling Constellation, the program pushing the boundaries of technology, he has effectively hobbled his own stated goals :roll:
    And what is with landing on an asteroid :?: :shock: obambi has been watching (and believing) too many movies :???:

  • Bruce Pott

    “Like it or not, we are the only super power in the world” Obama’s statement earlier this week. WTF….Like it or not? It’s clear that B.O. is not comfortable with U.S. superiority. His redistribution ideology apparently extends to our leadership in space exploration. His policies are designed to create equality, not raising the lower end of the equation, but by diminishing the achievements of the top end of the equation…..in this case NASA’s overwhelming superiority in space exploration. If we, the American People, allow this radical agenda to continue then the United States is doomed to mediocrity. We must take back this country in November of 2010 and finish the job in November of 2012.

    • http://EyesOfAmerica.com Kiowah

      You hit that nail right on it’s head. Read between the lines. Always is said. Truth lies between the words. Have to listen.

  • Bruce Pott

    “Like it or not, we are the only super power in the world” Obama’s statement earlier this week. WTF….Like it or not? It’s clear that B.O. is not comfortable with U.S. superiority. His redistribution ideology apparently extends to our leadership in space exploration. His policies are designed to create equality, not raising the lower end of the equation, but by diminishing the achievements of the top end of the equation…..in this case NASA’s overwhelming superiority in space exploration. If we, the American People, allow this radical agenda to continue then the United States is doomed to mediocrity. We must take back this country in November of 2010 and finish the job in November of 2012.

  • Xavier

    BHO is just trying to get the illegal immigrant population under control by making America so unappealing that they don’t want to come to America any more.

    Besides he needs all that NASA budget for his Obamacare now.

    :mad: