Home  »  General  »  Obama Cracks Down On Fuel To Force Hybrids And Cap And Trade

Obama Cracks Down On Fuel To Force Hybrids And Cap And Trade



Apr 1, 2010 15 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

033110_fuel_efficiency_monster_397x224

The Obama administration set tougher gas mileage standards for new cars and trucks Thursday, spurring the next generation of fuel-sipping gas-electric hybrids, efficient engines and electric cars.

The heads of the Transportation Department and the Environmental Protection Agency signed final rules setting fuel efficiency standards for model years 2012-2016, with a goal of achieving by 2016 the equivalent of 35.5 miles per gallon combined for cars and trucks, an increase of nearly 10 mpg over current standards set by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.

The EPA set a tailpipe emissions standard of 250 grams (8.75 ounces) of carbon dioxide per mile for vehicles sold in 2016, equal to what would be emitted by vehicles meeting the mileage standard. The EPA issued its first rules ever on vehicle greenhouse gas emissions following a 2007 Supreme Court decision.

“These historic new standards set ambitious, but achievable, fuel economy requirements for the automotive industry that will also encourage new and emerging technologies,” Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood said in a statement. “We will be helping American motorists save money at the pump, while putting less pollution in the air.”

Each auto company will have a different fuel-efficiency target, based on its mix of vehicles. Automakers that build more small cars will have a higher target than car companies that manufacture a broad range of cars and trucks. The standard could be as low as 34.1 mpg by 2016 because automakers are expected to receive credits for reducing greenhouse gas emissions in other ways, including preventing the leaking of coolant from air conditioners.

“This is a significant step towards cleaner air and energy efficiency, and an important example of how our economic and environmental priorities go hand-in-hand,” EPA Administrator Lisa P. Jackson said in a statement.

Dave McCurdy, a former congressman from Oklahoma who leads the Alliance of Automobile Manufacturers, a trade group representing 11 automakers, said the industry supports a single national standard for future vehicles, saying the program “makes sense for consumers, for government policymakers and for automakers.”

LaHood and Jackson said the new requirements will save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program. The new standards move up goals set in a 2007 energy law, which required the auto industry to meet a 35 mpg average by 2020.

The rules should add costs to new cars and trucks. The government said the requirements would add an estimated $434 per vehicle in the 2012 model year and $926 per vehicle by 2016 but would save more than $3,000 over the life of the vehicle through better gas mileage.

EPA and the Transportation Department said the requirements would reduce carbon dioxide emissions by about 960 million metric tons over the lifetime of the vehicles regulated, or the equivalent of taking 50 million cars and light trucks off the road in 2030.

Environmental groups have sought curbs on greenhouse gas emissions, blamed for global warming, and challenged the Bush administration for blocking a waiver request from California to pursue more stringent air pollution rules than required by the federal government. The request was granted by the Obama administration last year.

“The standards forthcoming under the ‘clean car peace treaty’ are a good deal for consumers, for companies, for the country and for the planet,” said David Doniger, climate policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council.

Automakers have been working on an assortment of fuel-efficient technologies, including hybrids, electric cars and technologies that shut off an engine’s cylinders when full power isn’t needed.

Nissan is releasing its electric car, the Leaf, later this year, while General Motors is introducing the Chevrolet Volt, which can go 40 miles on battery power before an engine kicks in to generate power. Ford is bringing its “EcoBoost” line of direct-injection turbocharged engines, which provide a 20 percent increase in fuel efficiency, to 90 percent of its models by 2013.


  • idi amin dada

    LaHood and Jackson said the new requirements will save 1.8 billion barrels of oil over the life of the program.

    ^^^Thats 24 days of world usage.^^^ Whoopie Doo Doo.

    Electric cars in significant quantities are flat unfeasible, Period.

    • idi amin dada

      I’m going to be buried in my big block, rubber burning, muscle car.

    • CPLViper

      I have a lifetime bumper-to-bumper warranty on my HEMI powered Jeep Commander and I plan to use it.

      If they keep this shit up, we will have to pedal new cars up the hills like fuckin’ mopeds.

      I do have one questions though … if suddenly there are millions of battery powered cars on the road that plug into the wall every night … WHERE IN THE HELL DO WE GET THE ELECTRICITY FROM? I mean c’mon … the entire country knows what happens to the power grid in California in the summertime. It would be x1000 to the whole country if everyone charged their car at night. Oh … yeah … that’s right … shithead (BHO) wants to build one or two nuke plants. Too bad that one or two comes nowhere near what we would need to support that level of electricity generation.

    • Dan (San Diego)

      Viper…….they have HEMI’s in Jeep Commmanders?????? damn dude, wheelie machine…..

    • viviliberoomuori

      Considering the electric motors used require ALOT of rare-earth metals like neodymium. They’re not called rare-earth for nothing. Worlds largest exporter of neodymium? China. They already fudge with production ‘numbers’ to spike global prices.
      So, we’re trying to replace a ‘disappearing’ resource (oil) with another disappearing resource. Sounds fine!
      /sarc

    • CPLViper

      Dan … they sure do … mine is the 5.7L HEMI. Threw on a K&N cold air intake and a Magnaflow exhaust a few weeks ago … gas-guzzling fun. (Actually, the intake and exhaust added 1.5mpg to my average).

    • Lock and Load

      I wonder when the time will come that classic musclecars are outlawed to satisfy these eco-nuts… :evil: My first car was a 68 Dodge Charger, 440 powered, maybe 8 mpg :shock: :twisted: I remember that time with pride and a sense of having enjoyed a great thing in life, but what of people 20 years from now… “Oh yeah, my first car was a Prius…” :roll: ya-freakin’ hoo :???:
      :arrow: CPLViper
      You have made a great point regarding the electrical requirements… These idiots are so idealistic and “morally superior” that they have not even taken into consideration these simple questions, like where does the freakin’ electricity come from…DUH :!: :roll: May God help us all, especially the auto enthusiasts among us :???:

  • Debbie the Housewife

    I have nothing to say other than to call him a fucking asshole. :beer:

  • YERMOM

    anyone got a late 60′s GTO they want to sell?

    • http://none gzero

      Just a hotwheels, but I customized it.

  • rightangle

    There is no saving any money with this program. If it worked, they will just raise the tax on gasoline claiming people aren’t spending enough to keep current budgeted road programs solvent, or some such lie.

  • ji

    Its really all about control.
    They control what we buy and how its used.

    • CPLViper

      Yup … I can see it now;

      All the companies fail to meet the requirements … all except GM, of course.

      In 2016, GM customers claims mpg ratings are not correct. GM says those customers hmust ave under inflated tires. US Government mandates all citizens to buy GM cars and ONLY GM cars.

  • PatriotofPast

    I’m asking that EVERYONE read this article titled :
    “What Should States Do When The Federal Government Usurps Power?”

    http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/21596

    I say we tell them to “Kindly F— Off”!
    And stay out of MY LIFE! :gun:

    • Cold Soldier

      Good article, but heres my problem. If you remember right, my people told the federal goverment to kindly F-off! in 1861…that didnt work out too well, and we have been steamrolled by them ever since. :neutral: