Home  »  Immigration  »  Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice In Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law

Judge Lets Mexico Have Voice In Court Case Against U.S. Immigration Law



Jul 1, 2010 5 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

drug_war_02

Fox News:

Mexico gets to have a say in one of the lawsuits challenging Arizona’s immigration enforcement law.

A federal judge on Thursday granted Mexico’s request to be allowed to file a legal brief supporting the challenge. That means the judge will consider the brief Mexico submitted previously.

Mexico says it wants to defend its citizens’ rights and that the law would lead to racial profiling and hinder trade and tourism. It also says the law would hinder work against drug trafficking and related violence.

Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer, who signed the law on April 23 and changes to it on April 30, has lawyers defending it in court.

In a statement issued last week, Brewer said she was “very disappointed” to learn of Mexico’s filing and reiterated that “Arizona’s immigration enforcement laws are both reasonable and constitutional.”

“I believe that Arizona will ultimately prevail and that our laws will be found constitutional,” Brewer added.

Brewer and other supporters of the bill say the law is intended to pressure illegal immigrants to leave the United States. They contend it is a needed response to federal inaction over what they say is a porous border and social problems caused by illegal immigration. They also argue that it has protections against racial profiling.

The law’s provisions include a requirement that police enforcing another law ask people about their immigration status if there’s a “reasonable suspicion” they’re in the country illegally.

The law takes effect July 29 unless blocked by a court.

Until recently, Mexican law made illegal immigration a criminal offense — anyone arrested for the violation could be fined, imprisoned for up to two years and deported. Mexican lawmakers changed that in 2008 to make illegal immigration a civil violation like it is in the United States, but their law still reads an awful lot like Arizona’s.

Arizona’s policy, which President Felipe Calderon derided during a recent U.S. trip as “discriminatory,” states police can’t randomly stop people and demand papers, and the law prohibits racial profiling.

Mexican law, however, requires law enforcement officials “to demand that foreigners prove their legal presence in the country before attending to any issues.”

Amnesty International recently issued a report claiming illegal immigrants in Mexico — typically from Central America — face abuse, rape and kidnappings, and that Mexican police do little to stop it. When illegal immigration was a criminal offense in Mexico, officials were known to seek bribes from suspects to keep them out of jail.

But Mexico said it has a legitimate interest in defending its citizens’ rights and that Arizona’s law would lead to racial profiling, hinder trade and tourism, and strain the countries’ work on combating drug trafficking and related violence.


  • mike3481

    “Mexico says it wants to defend its citizens’ rights and that the law would lead to racial profiling…”
    ___________

    The Arizona Attorney General ought to demand the Mexican government prove it does not profile Mexican citizens via the continued, (unofficial), existence of the Spanish Colonial Caste System in Mexico.

    He could start with this question: “Why is every Mexican politician elected to national office a white (Criollo) Mexican”?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Criollo_people#The_Spanish_colonial_caste_system

    • Desert Rat

      Unfortunately the Arizona AG is a left wing D’rat. No prayer of this happening unless the Governors private attorneys push your great point.

  • Josh

    :idea: How the fuck does a foreign country have a voice in the dictating of American law?????

    • nospyme

      They shouldn’t. They don’t have standing, and yet, here we are. International groups &/or nations need to stay out of our internal affairs!

  • http://patdollard.com Averager Joe

    I hope soon, Judges like this will be @#@#### in front of the FED courthouse….

    WTF? THIS IS TRUE AND ABSOLUTE TREASON AGAINST THE CONSTITUTION TO ALLOW OTHER COUNTRIES TO RUN AMERICAN COURTS.

    Still think they will allow the “seating of a Republican-Tea Party Congress” in January 2011 after winning November? It is still over 6 months away….

    One last comment, we know that Obama-bots can rig 80%-90% of every ballot counting facility or polling-place in the country……Think about that.