Pentagon’s “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell” Survey Inflames Gays

July 10th, 2010 (10) Posted By Pat Dollard.

00445

The Flaming Gay Times:

Reporting from Washington — A Pentagon survey about gays and lesbians serving in the armed forces was criticized as biased Friday by gay veterans organizations, which predicted that it would produce skewed results on the potential effect of lifting the ban on homosexuals serving openly in the military.

Most of the criticism focused on a handful of questions in the lengthy survey related to whether unit readiness would suffer and the extent of concerns among service members about sharing housing, bath facilities and attending social functions with gay and lesbian personnel.

The online questionnaire was sent this week to 400,000 randomly selected military personnel by a Pentagon group studying the effect of repealing the current prohibition on openly gay service members, a policy known as “don’t ask, don’t tell.” The effort was ordered by Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates after President Obama announced his support for repealing the ban this year.

Among the questions posed in the survey: “If don’t ask, don’t tell is repealed and you are working with a service member in your immediate unit who has said he or she is gay or lesbian, how would that affect your own ability to fulfill your mission during combat?” Respondents can answer with a range of choices from “very positively” to “very negatively,” as well as “no effect” or “don’t know.”

Critics said the wording of some questions made it likely that the responses would be overwhelmingly negative and that the results would be used to justify discriminatory measures against homosexual service members, even if the current ban is repealed.

“If you really want to assess whether repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ will harm military readiness, there are established ways to study that question, and this is not the way,” said Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center, a research organization at UC Santa Barbara that made a portion of the survey public. “There are some things you don’t poll the troops about.”

Critics of the survey noted that it did not ask about the effect on unit morale or readiness due to the current policy of discharging troops found to be gay.

But Pentagon Press Secretary Geoff Morrell defended the survey in a hastily called news conference Friday afternoon. The questionnaire, he said, was a “very credible and professional survey” that had been designed by a polling firm working with members of the Pentagon group charged with studying a repeal of the ban.

The questions concerning attitudes about bath facilities, housing and the effect on unit effectiveness were necessary, he told reporters, because many service members had raised those issues in private forums and one-on-one discussions conducted by Pentagon officials.

The survey results would allow the Pentagon to understand the full extent of the concerns within the armed forces before proceeding with a repeal of the ban, he said. Morrell cited the possibility that “adjustments” to housing and bathing facilities might be considered if the ban is overturned.

Gates has set a December deadline for completing the review of the 1993 ban. The Pentagon has been concerned that many military members would decline to participate in the anonymous survey, despite privacy protections aimed at guarding the identities and sexual orientations of those who participate.

It was Gates who earlier ordered a doubling of the sample size from the original 200,000. Critics cited the large sample size as one of the troubling aspects of the survey, saying that it amounted in effect to polling the armed forces about the wisdom of proceeding with the repeal.

“It is simply impossible to imagine a survey with such derogatory and insulting wording, assumptions and insinuations going out about any other minority group in the military,” said Alexander Nicholson, executive director of Servicemembers United and a former U.S. Army interrogator. “Unfortunately, this expensive survey stokes the fires of homophobia by its very design.”

At least one gay rights group, the Servicemembers Legal Defense Network, which provides legal help to service members discharged under the current law, recommended that troops should not participate in the questionnaire, because the current policy of discharging openly gay service members remains in force.

Morrell said nothing in the survey asks a participant to reveal his or her sexual orientation.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • mike3481

    …said Aaron Belkin, director of the Palm Center… “there are some things you don’t poll the troops about”.

    Ah, excuse me?

    I’ve got to believe that a change in policy that will, in the military, literally change the meaning of the question, “you got my back?”, is something the non-fags in the military would want to be polled about.

    • T-Bagg

      That’s the line that stuck out most to me too. When it’s something that is going to affect the way I work and live. Poll me or not, I’m gonna let you know how I feel.

      You don’t poll us because you don’t want the truth of our answers. Just because you pull the covers over your eyes doesn’t mean the boogeyman goes away.

    • Tyler520

      Furthermore, she kept using ambiguous terms, such as: “there are things, methods, etc…”…

      “things and methods” eh? define things and methods if you have a grievance. In order for their critique to reach listening ears, provide an alternative, or stop being an uppity dike.

      Just like the pro-amnesty crowd using the term, “comprehensive” without bothering to define it, which is completely hypocritical and contradictory

    • Vet

      When desegregation happened, did they do a poll? Let me answer for you; NO.

      Some day your comment will be as outdated as “How’s it gonna make you feel if you have to be in a foxhole with a nigger?”

  • http://www.dirtydozensbunker.com Sanders

    “Don’t ask what I think of you. I might give you the answer you want me to.”

    Yeah, the fags are scared to death they will learn just how much other soldiers don’t want them around.

  • Jenny

    It is troubling to me that this organization finds the concept of “don’t ask, don’t tell” offensive, because it denies them their right to speak up, yet they don’t want the troops putting their lives in harms way, to be asked or to be able to tell.

  • MarkF

    Gays are inflamed about polling? :shock:

    You cant make that stuff up

    • Bobby E.

      Gays are always ‘inflamed’ … as in ‘flaming homo’.

  • Sentinel at the Gate

    Gays may have been in the military all along, but I don’t believe we need fag brigades. And who gives a fuck if they’re “inflamed”. My drill sergeant inflamed my ass a bunch with insults that would put R.Lee Ermy to shame, but I didn’t get all bent out of shape about it. He was trying to mold soldiers and not teach dick sucking. If you fags don’t like the rules, go join the Dutch Army where you can smoke dope, wear you hair long and assault your buddy’s ass.

  • Chuck O

    If they dislike the policy, then they shouldn’t sign up, but it’s been my experience that most of the people that think DADT should be repealed, have never served in the military and have no intention of signing up, even if or when it does it turned over.

    They use straw man arguments like soldiers get to post nude photos all over the barracks. Sorry, but I served when Clinton was CIC and by then, the army was politically correct.

    Did my basic at Ft. Knox (all males) and we were taught to pronounce BRAS as brass, not bras.

    Do they want us to kill the enemy in war or invite them to sit down for tea?