Senate Votes To Repeal “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”, Obama Expected To Sign This Week

December 19th, 2010 (12) Posted By Pat Dollard.

WASHINGTON (AP) – In a historic vote for gay rights, the Senate agreed on Saturday to do away with the military’s 17-year ban on openly gay troops and sent President Barack Obama legislation to overturn the Clinton-era policy known as “don’t ask, don’t tell.”

Obama was expected to sign the bill into law next week, although changes to military policy probably wouldn’t take effect for at least several months. Under the bill, the president and his top military advisers must first certify that lifting the ban won’t hurt troops’ ability to fight. After that, the military would undergo a 60-day wait period.

Repeal would mean that, for the first time in American history, gays would be openly accepted by the armed forces and could acknowledge their sexual orientation without fear of being kicked out.

More than 13,500 service members have been dismissed under the 1993 law.

“It is time to close this chapter in our history,” Obama said in a statement. “It is time to recognize that sacrifice, valor and integrity are no more defined by sexual orientation than they are by race or gender, religion or creed.”

The Senate voted 65-31 to pass the bill, with eight Republicans siding with 55 Democrats and two independents in favor of repeal. The House had passed an identical version of the bill, 250-175, earlier this week.

Supporters hailed the Senate vote as a major step forward for gay rights. Many activists hope that integrating openly gay troops within the military will lead to greater acceptance in the civilian world, as it did for blacks after President Harry Truman’s 1948 executive order on equal treatment regardless of race in the military.

“The military remains the great equalizer,” said Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass. “Just like we did after President Truman desegregated the military, we’ll someday look back and wonder what took Washington so long to fix it.”

Sen. John McCain, Obama’s GOP rival in 2008, led the opposition. Speaking on the Senate floor minutes before a crucial test vote, the Arizona Republican acknowledged he couldn’t stop the bill. He blamed elite liberals with no military experience for pushing their social agenda on troops during wartime.

“They will do what is asked of them,” McCain said of service members. “But don’t think there won’t be a great cost.”

How the military will implement a change in policy, and how long that will take remains unclear. Senior Pentagon officials have said the new policy could be rolled out incrementally, service by service or unit by unit.

In a statement issued immediately after the vote, Defense Secretary Robert Gates said he will begin the certification process immediately. But any change in policy won’t come until after careful consultation with military service chiefs and combatant commanders, he said.

“Successful implementation will depend upon strong leadership, a clear message and proactive education throughout the force,” he said.

Adm. Mike Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said he welcomes the change.

“No longer will able men and women who want to serve and sacrifice for their country have to sacrifice their integrity to do so,” he said. “We will be a better military as a result.”

Sen. Carl Levin, a chief proponent of repeal, said he has received a commitment from the administration that it won’t drag its heels.

“We hope it will be sooner, rather than later,” he said.

The fate of “don’t ask, don’t tell” had been far from certain earlier this year when Obama called for its repeal in his State of the Union address. Despite strong backing from liberals in Congress, Republicans and conservative Democrats remained skeptical that lifting the ban could be done quickly without hurting combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In February, Mullen provided the momentum Obama needed by telling a packed Senate hearing room that he felt the law was unjust. As chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Mullen became the first senior active-duty officer in the military to suggest that gays could serve openly without affecting military effectiveness.

“No matter how I look at the issue,” Mullen said, “I cannot escape being troubled by the fact that we have in place a policy which forces young men and women to lie about who they are in order to defend their fellow citizens.”

With Mullen’s backing, Gates ordered a yearlong study on the impact, including a survey of troops and their families.

The study, released Nov. 30, found that two-thirds of service members didn’t think changing the law would have much of an effect. But of those who did predict negative consequences, most were assigned to combat arms units. The statistic became ammunition for opponents of repeal, including the service chiefs of the Army and Marine Corps.

“I don’t want to lose any Marines to the distraction,” Gen. James Amos, head of the Marine Corps, told reporters. “I don’t want to have any Marines that I’m visiting at Bethesda (Naval Medical Center) with no legs be the result of any type of distraction.”

Mullen and Gates counter that the fear of disruption is overblown and could be addressed through training. They note the Pentagon’s finding that 92 percent of troops who believe they have served with a gay person saw no effect on their units’ morale or effectiveness.

But even with backing from Gates and Mullen, the bill appeared all but dead this month when Senate Republicans united against it on procedural grounds. In last-minute wrangling, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid was able to revive the bill during the rare Saturday session with just days to go before the lame-duck session was to end.

The Republicans who voted for repeal said the Pentagon study on gays and assurances from senior military leaders played a crucial role.

“The repeal of ‘don’t ask, don’t tell’ will be implemented in a common sense way,” said Ohio Republican Sen. George Voinovich. “Our military leaders have assured Congress that our troops will engage in training and address relevant issues before instituting this policy change.”

Advocacy groups were jubilant following the Senate’s initial test vote that passed 63-33 and set up final passage. The Servicemembers Legal Defense Network called the issue the “defining civil rights initiative of this decade.” Supporters of repeal filled the visitor seats overlooking the Senate floor, ready to protest had the bill failed.

“This has been a long-fought battle, but this failed and discriminatory law will now be history,” said Joe Solmonese, president of the Human Rights Campaign.

At least 25 countries allow gays to serve openly in the armed forces, among them Britain, Canada and Israel, according to the Palm Center, a research institute at the University of California, Santa Barbara.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • MadDog

    A “Great” step forward for the liberal Anti-American Dimocrats that hate the military and wish to destroy it.

  • MadDog

    A “Great” step forward for the liberal Anti-American Dimocrats that hate the military and wish to destroy it. I pledge that my family which has been a military one for generations back to the revolution will no longer participate in what is becomming a Sodomite Millitary. Lets see how the liberals man the force without keeping us in a depression or resorting to a Draft. :gun: :gun: :gun:

  • David

    This means that obama can enlist when he goes down to defeat in 2012. Swell.

  • rld

    Big Mistake- NOW, can the new congress fix it? Do they have the balls to try?

    • Hawkerdriver(PissontheKoran)

      Nope.They are complicit.With the exception of mabey three,Inhofe,Bachmann,and mabey McConnell,I would say all Republicans are nothing more than dems-in-drag.

      Dispicable.Conniving. Traitors. All of them. :gun:

    • Blade Runner

      I wouldn’t be so quick to castrate the new congress. At least give them the benefit of the doubt, they haven’t been sworn in yet.

  • bman

    Lawyers are happy.

  • http://patdollard.com USMC 3112

    Man, where do you start? Our only hope is,if the new Congress will repeal this law. I agree. I don’t think they have the balls to do this. I blame the Liberal Brass including that POS ADM MULLEN AND GATES! Mullen knows this will ruin good order and discipline within the ranks. Mullen and Gates are just like the pieces of shit in Congress and Senate, THEY DON’T LISTEN TO WHAT WE ARE SAYING!!Mullen’s response to his support of gay’s serving openly, “if our service men and women don’t like it they can find another job” Nice lleadership you fucking piece of shit! Like everything, mullah oloser,reid,pelosi are doing to ruin our Country, THIS IS PURPOSFUL! This decision is meant to ruin the Military’s morale! We are the ones that have to fight and die for our Country and they didn’t even listen to what we have to say in this matter. Everyone here at Pat’s place knows, we in the Military are overwhelmingly opposed to this decision!There will be large ammounts of service people leaving when their enlistment is up. Who will be left to fight our Nation’s Battles? Oloser,mullen,gates,reid,pelosi? A frightening sobering thought. Please pray for my fellow Marines of 3/5 “The Darkhorse” Marines. They have suffered 9 Casualties in the last 4-5 days while laying on the line in Afghanistan. God Speed Brothers!

    • Colt.45

      Your 100% correct. At I’m out for good. Nowadays, evil is good and good is evil

  • wildbill

    The 8 repubs. that that voted for the repeal may you rot in hell.

  • Blade Runner

    Harry Reid is a fag.

    Call me old fashioned, a chauvinist, a prude, call me politically incorrect, but if I were charged with building an army to WIN a war, the only soldiers in it would be MEN.

    • doubletap

      10-4 Blade, Any culture that puts women in harms way in the way we have been led to do to be politically correct is fucked up. The noble warrior protects the weak and that which he holds dear. Men trying to be women and women trying to be men won’t work for the military and will turn out to be a disaster. Baloney smoking FAGS don’t belong in the military.