Attacks Rush Limbaugh For Criticizing Obama Agenda: Leftist Tucson Sheriff Tries To Gain Political Profit From Blood Of Dead Victims – With Video

Jan 10, 2011 20 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Dupnik at first press conference, kicking off his entire response to the massacre first with his Leftist propaganda

He can say it’s all about the tone all he wants, but that’s bull. It’s about the fact that Conservatives are appropriately responding to the Leftist revolution that threatens our republic, and he wants their message silenced. He’s a committed Leftist operative, and has called anyone who supports the new Arizona immigration law a “racist”.

This is going to be the Left’s tactic to enforce a clampdown on the Right’s speech: they will push for censorship legislation (aka hate speech legislation) based not on Jared Loughner being a ginned-up Conservative, because he wasn’t and they can’t, but based on “tone”. You will see Leftist propagandists doing “mea culpas”, pretending to take blame for being part of the “tone problem” in order to snooker the American people into supporting censorship legislation designed to censor the Conservative voice.

ABC News:

The Arizona sheriff investigating the Tucson shooting that left U.S. Rep. Gabrielle Giffords critically wounded had harsh words today for those engaging in political rhetoric, calling conservative radio host Rush Limbaugh “irresponsible” for continuing the vitriol.

“The kind of rhetoric that flows from people like Rush Limbaugh, in my judgment he is irresponsible, uses partial information, sometimes wrong information,” Pima County Sheriff Clarence Dupnik said today. “[Limbaugh] attacks people, angers them against government, angers them against elected officials and that kind of behavior in my opinion is not without consequences.”

Limbaugh today railed against the media and Dupnik for trying to draw a link between the heated political climate and the shooting rampage, calling the sheriff a “fool.” But Dupnik stood by his assertions.

“The vitriol affects the [unstable] personality that we are talking about,” he said. “You can say, ‘Oh no, it doesn’t,’ but my opinion is that it does.”

Investigators have yet to determine what motivated 22-year-old Jared Lee Loughner, described by some as appearing to be mentally unstable, to allegedly open fire on the crowd outside the Tucson Safeway. However, so far there is no evidence that he has any ties to any political group.

Dupnik took ABC News’ Diane Sawyer on a tour today of the Safeway where six people were killed and 14 others, including Giffords, were injured.

Dupnik said eyewitnesses reported that the gun was about a foot away from Giffords’ head when she was shot. The gunman then fired wildly and seemingly indiscriminately at the crowd of people.

“It’s a matter of seconds,” he said. “I’m told he was firing as fast he was capable of firing.”

“He’s trying to re-load when one of the individuals hits him over the head with a chair,” he said, “and then people grab him and a lady grabs the magazine and at that point he is subdued.”

Dupnik said he had been advised not to discuss Loughner’s mental condition or his home life, but said, “I can tell you this is a somewhat dysfunctional family.”

Many have reported that Loughner behaved bizarrely in his community college classes, some even going to school officials in fear of their safety.

“All I can tell you is that teachers and fellow students were concerned about his bizarre behavior in class to the point where some of him were physically afraid of him,” Dupnik said. “He was acting in very weird fashion to the point where they had several incidents with him to the point where law enforcement at Pima College got involved and they decided to expel him. And they did.”

Dupnik maintains that it was Loughner’s own demons, not his state’s relatively lenient gun control laws, that caused the tragedy on Saturday.

“He could have purchased this gun in any state. It’s not just Arizona,” said Dupnik, who owns a gun. “There are too many people who have temper problems who have troubled personalities. This isn’t an unusual individual. There are hundreds just like him in our community. And in every other community.”

Dupnik said he’d like to see the federal government establish some kind of commission to deal with civility in the United States and make recommendations about how to get it back. “I don’t have a problem with heated arguments,” he said. “As a matter of fact you are kind of getting a little heat out of me now, and it is because I am very angry at what has transpired.”