Home  »  Politics  »  Rabbi In Wall Street Journal: Palin Is Right About Blood Libel

Rabbi In Wall Street Journal: Palin Is Right About Blood Libel



Jan 13, 2011 12 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Wall Street Journal:

The term “blood libel”—which Sarah Palin invoked this week to describe the suggestions by journalists and politicians that conservative figures like herself are responsible for last weekend’s shooting rampage in Tucson, Ariz.—is fraught with perilous meaning in Jewish history.

The term connotes the earliest accusations that Jews killed Jesus and enthusiastically embraced responsibility for his murder, telling Pontius Pilate, “His blood be upon us and our children” (Matthew 27:25). Thus was born the legend of Jewish bloodlust and of Hebrew ritual use of Christian blood for sacramental purposes. The term was later used more specifically to describe accusations against Jews—primarily in Europe—of sacrificing kidnapped Christian children to use their blood in the baking of Passover matzos.

The Benedictine monk Thomas of Monmouth is generally credited with having popularized the blood libel in his “Life of the Martyr William from Norwich,” written in 1173 about a young boy who was found stabbed to death. Thomas quoted a servant woman who said she witnessed Jews lacerating the boy’s head with thorns, crucifying him, and piercing his side. While William was canonized, the Jews of Norwich fared less well. On Feb. 6, 1190, they were all found slaughtered in their homes, save those who escaped to the local tower and committed mass suicide.

Despite the strong association of the term with collective Jewish guilt and concomitant slaughter, Sarah Palin has every right to use it. The expression may be used whenever an amorphous mass is collectively accused of being murderers or accessories to murder.

The abominable element of the blood libel is not that it was used to accuse Jews, but that it was used to accuse innocent Jews—their innocence, rather than their Jewishness, being the operative point. Had the Jews been guilty of any of these heinous acts, the charge would not have been a libel.

Jews did not kill Jesus. As the Roman historian Tacitus makes clear, he was murdered by Pontius Pilate, whose reign of terror in ancient Judea was so excessive, even by Roman standards, that (according to the Roman-Jewish chronicler Josephus) Rome recalled him in the year 36 due to his sadistic practices. King Herod Agrippa I, writing to the Emperor Caligula, noted Pilate’s “acts of violence, plunderings . . . and continual murder of persons untried and uncondemned, and his never-ending, endless, and unbelievable cruelties, gratuitous and most grievous inhumanity.”

Murder is humanity’s most severe sin, and it is trivialized when an innocent party is accused of the crime—especially when that party is a collective too numerous to be defended individually. If Jews have learned anything in their long history, it is that a false indictment of murder against any group threatens every group. As Martin Luther King Jr. wrote in his Letter from Birmingham Jail, “Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere.” Indeed, the belief that the concept of blood libel applies only to Jews is itself a form of reverse discrimination that should be dismissed.

Judaism rejects the idea of collective responsibility for murder, as the Hebrew Bible condemns accusations of collective guilt against Jew and non-Jew alike. “The soul who sins is the one who will die. The son will not share the guilt of the father, nor will the father share the guilt of the son. The righteousness of the righteous man will be credited to him, and the wickedness of the wicked will be charged against him” (Ezekiel 18).

How unfortunate that some have chosen to compound a national tragedy by politicizing the murder of six innocent lives and the attempted assassination of a congresswoman.

To be sure, America should embrace civil political discourse for its own sake, and no political faction should engage in demonizing rhetoric. But promoting this high principle by simultaneously violating it and engaging in a blood libel against innocent parties is both irresponsible and immoral.

Rabbi Boteach is the author of “Honoring the Child Spirit: Inspiration and Learning from Our Children” (Vanguard, 2011). He will shortly publish a book on the Jewishness of Jesus and his murder at Roman hands.


  • http://thecaptiansquarters.blogspot.com/ Capt-Dax

    In the Alinsky model, “organizing” is a euphemism for “revolution” — a wholesale revolution whose ultimate objective is the systematic acquisition of power by a purportedly oppressed segment of the population, and the radical transformation of America’s social and economic structure.

    The goal is to foment enough public discontent, moral confusion, and outright chaos to spark the social upheaval that Marx, Engels, and Lenin predicted — a revolution whose foot soldiers view the status quo as fatally flawed and wholly unworthy of salvation. Thus, the theory goes, the people will settle for nothing less than that status quo’s complete collapse — to be followed by the erection of an entirely new system upon its ruins.

    Toward that end, they will be apt to follow the lead of charismatic radical organizers who project an aura of confidence and vision, and who profess to clearly understand what types of societal “change” is needed.

    But Alinsky’s brand of revolution was not characterized by dramatic, sweeping, overnight transformations of social institutions.

    As Richard Poe puts it, “Alinsky viewed revolution as a slow, patient process.

    The trick was to penetrate existing institutions such as churches, unions and political parties.” Alinsky advised organizers and their disciples to quietly, subtly gain influence within the decision-making ranks of these institutions, and to introduce changes from that platform.

    One of Obama’s early mentors in the Alinsky method, Mike Kruglik, would later say the following about Obama:

    “He was a natural, the undisputed master of agitation, who could engage a room full of recruiting targets in a rapid-fire Socratic dialogue, nudging them to admit that they were not living up to their own standards.

    As with the panhandler, he could be aggressive and confrontational. With probing, sometimes personal questions, he would pinpoint the source of pain in their lives, tearing down their egos just enough before dangling a carrot of hope that they could make things better.”

    For several years, Obama himself taught workshops on the Alinsky method.

  • Axel

    Faithful followers/organizers were in full form w/those damn T-shirts yesterday.
    Brainwashing is what it it.

    • amy

      Axel- You put your finger on why those t-shirts bothered me so much. It is group brainwashing.

    • amy

      Axel- You put your finger on why those t-shirts bothered me so much. It is brainwashing.

    • Gary in Midwest

      Reminds me of the Hale-Bop cult. Purple jumpsuits and white tennis shoes while waiting for their leader to take them to the beyond.

  • http://www.sodahead.com/user/profile/2085287/rthtgakaroland/ Roland

    Of course she was. What was done to her by Obama & Co. was an almost perfect parallel.

    Obama’s Blood Bounce: Penn & Clinton told Obama that he needed his own Oklahoma City to reconnect, and Obama is exploiting the AZ atrocity to get his blood bounce in his low approval numbers.

    Obama, the media, and activist leftists are also pinning their hopes on the “Civility Card” as a replacement for their worn out “Race Card.”

    I am sure that they who committed Blood Libel in their efforts to get a desperate president’s and endangered agenda’s approval ratings a “Blood Bounce”, will miss the irony in its every use.

    Obama and his keystone ObamaCare are both in trouble, and he and his followers are even willing to engage in blood libel to get Obama’s Blood Bounce.

  • derised1

    A number of prominent Jews, including liberals like Alan Dershowitz and former NY Mayor Ed Koch, have had the courage to speak up and say that Sarah is right on this.

    The media is spitting mad because Sarah called them out for what they have been engaging in – blood libel! The world now knows how depraved and soulless many in the Main Stream Media are.

    • kagiso

      very well stated and couldnt agree more … no more George Bush silence approaches to the evil that is the MSM and the Obama regime ..

  • odin2012

    Obama and his minions will not rest until they have spilled blood of free men on their hands.
    It is the left and only the left that has documented accounts of violent speech and acts of violence.
    The only thing stopping their complete take over of our freedoms is our guns and gun ownership. That will soon change.

    • MinneSoCold

      They already have spilled blood of free men on their hands and they aren’t resting. It’s more like until all are defenseless and compliant.

  • Cracker Master

    You bet your ass odin.
    I wont be happy till I see this nation in flames.
    Cracker Master has spoken

  • Girlfriend

    You will never be anyone’s master