Pat Dollard

Tweet

Fox News:

Is MTV now a purveyor of kiddie porn?

The controversial British import series “Skins” made its debut on the cable network last Monday, causing uproar for its frank depiction of teenage sex and drug use.

The Parents Television Council called the show the “most dangerous program that has ever been foisted on your children.”

“Despite the MA-rating for ‘Skins,’ MTV appears to be deliberately targeting teens with its marketing campaign,” PTC president Tim Winter told FOX411 in a statement. “The marketing campaign itself makes light of lying to parents and participating in all manner of harmful, irresponsible, illegal and adult-themed behavior.”

But aside from simply outraging parents, the network responsible for raunchy fare like “Jersey Shore” and “Teen Mom” may be in hot water with the legal system. Why? Unlike MTV’s envelope-pushing shows of the past, “Skins” features underage actors engaged in sexual situations. The youngest star of the show is only 15.

“Putting aside whether it is socially acceptable, I certainly believe that MTV is unnecessarily tempting fate,” Ian Friedman, an attorney specializing in computer-based sex offenses, told FOX411.

“It is not clear as to whether MTV is in violation of Federal or State child pornography laws, but that does not mean that they won’t end up defending themselves somewhere in the United States,” Friedman said, noting that attitudes towards nudity and sexuality are far more lax in the show’s native England.

According to the New York Times, a series of panicked meetings took place at MTV headquarters in New York on Tuesday, where one executive allegedly even discussed the possibility of criminal charges and jail time. Reportedly, nervous execs forced producers to edit out some of the more explicit content from future episodes.

But even if potentially damaging footage is edited out, that may not be enough to protect MTV from legal repercussions, says Friedman.

“While the images that are portrayed on television may be considered legal, that may not be the case for the edited footage,” Freidman said. “If that actor is underage and under the age of consent, possessing that raw footage may be problematic.”

With “Skins,” MTV execs knew that they had a controversial show on their hands—but one that they hoped would be a hit.

“When (MTV programming president) Tony DiSanto and (senior VP of series development) Liz Gateley landed ‘Skins,’ everyone at MTV couldn’t stop congratulating each other,” an MTV insider told FOX411. “They acquired a show that became a cult favorite in the UK, and they knew that casting actual teens doing what teens actually do was going to be controversial, ground-breaking—and a huge hit for them.”

But at what cost? “This situation presents a minefield of legal issues that may not have been considered prior to filming,” Friedman said. “In the event that some of the footage does constitute child pornography or obscene material, MTV will face the dilemma of what to do with the material. To discard it now may raise another host of legal issues pertaining to the destruction of evidence.”

“Skins” is rated TV-MA. According to tvguidelines.org, a TV-MA rating signifies that the program “is specifically designed to be viewed by adults and therefore may be unsuitable for children under 17.”

Nielsen ratings for the premiere, which was heavily promoted during MTV’s TV-14 hit “Jersey Shore,” show that it drew 1.2 million people younger than 18, or more than a third of its total audience.

“If MTV were my client, I would advise them to scale it back some,” Freidman said. “I do not see any benefit here except maybe an initial boost in ratings. The question may become whether it was worth it in the end.”

MTV did not return FOX411’s requests for comment.