Joe Lieberman: U.S. Needs To Raise Our Guard At Northern Border

February 1st, 2011 (10) Posted By Pat Dollard.

The Hill:

The U.S. is highly vulnerable to an attack by terrorists entering the country across the border with Canada, members of the Senate Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs Committee said Tuesday.

Citing a recently released federal study which found that only 32 miles of the 4,000-mile border had reached an “acceptable level of control,” senators of both parties called on the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to strengthen security at the northern border.

“The numbers speak for themselves,” said Committee Chairman Joseph Lieberman (I-Conn.). “These findings should sound a loud alarm to the Department of Homeland Security, the Canadian government and our committee. The American people are grossly underprotected along our northern border. We’ve got to work together with our neighbors in Canada to raise our guard.”

According to the General Accounting Office report, the U.S. Border Patrol was aware of illegal border crossings along only 1,007 miles of the 4,000-mile border. The Border Patrol said the remaining three-fourths of the border stood at “unacceptable” security levels.

According to the report, DHS believe the likelihood of a terrorist using the northern border to cross into the U.S. is much greater than an attacker coming in from Mexico “given the large expanse of area with limited law enforcement coverage.”

“We know that terrorists are going to probe to try and find the weak link and if you see a build-up along the southern border you’re not likely to try and cross through Mexico,” said Sen. Susan Collins (Maine), the ranking Republican on the committee. “You’re much more likely to try and cross into our country through Canada. And we have to acknowledge that reality.”

In fiscal year 2010, DHS spent nearly $3 billion investigating illegal northern border activity, making some 6,000 arrests and confiscating nearly 40,000 pounds of illegal drugs at and between the northern border ports of entry, according to the report.

Sen. Jon Tester (D-Mont.), whose state covers a large portion of the border, said DHS needs to reevaluate its resources and implement a more sound strategy to monitor illegal border activity.

“This report tells us what folks in Montana already know – that Homeland Security’s effort to secure the northern border has earned a grade of ‘incomplete,’” Tester said in a statement.

“DHS has to develop strategies that maximize resources so taxpayers are getting the most bang for their buck. We need to make smarter use of technology, because we don’t need or want the border overloaded with federal agents,” he said.

Lieberman said the U.S. will never have enough manpower to patrol the border’s full expanse. But by using existing technology, he said, the “situational awareness” of activity along the border can dramatically increase.

Lieberman had hoped the billion-dollar SBI-net program developed along the U.S.-Mexico border would be successful, so it could be used along the northern border as well. Homeland Security Secretary Janet Napolitano recently canceled the so-called “virtual fence” program, calling it a waste of taxpayer money. The move was met with approval from the majority of lawmakers from both parties, as well as Lieberman.

As Congress continues to try to rein in spending this year, Lieberman argued that the cost of law enforcement in other parts of the country that stemmed from illegal activity along the northern border was greater than the cost of securing the border.

“It’s hard to give a detailed answer [about budget possibilities],” Lieberman told reporters. “What we can see from the GAO report is that there is clearly a need. And we’re suffering vulnerability, in terms of terrorist attacks, but also drug smuggling, and other forms of crime coming across the border. So we pay a price for not investing in northern border security.

“As we go through the budget process this year with DHS, I’m going to keep asking them, ‘What are you investing in northern border security?’ We understand that we’re operating in a very difficult budgetary climate, but this is our security and only the national government can ultimately provide for it,” said Lieberman.

He added that he hoped to hold a hearing on the issue soon, after DHS had a chance to develop proposals for how to tighten the border’s security.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • Jed Wright

    The elephant in the room that everyone’s doing their best to ignore is 6 million more humans a month: you seriously think the problem’s terrorists killing a few thousand?!

    The Chinese failed to get to grips with their population… and the US can’t even admit it has one… let alone try to deal with the fundamentalists who want the US to become a theocracy and welcome self-destruction as the second coming!

    Yes the US has a damned serious immigration problem… but 60% of US population increase is INTERNAL growth. Americans are breeding like rabbits.

    Anyone here yet heard a US politician discuss what MIGHT be a sustainable population? Ever?

    Let me hazard a guess: when things get really bad the usual thing is to get a collapse… that falls below what is sustainable… then a recoil… and gradual stability. So you don’t just neatly shrink… COLLAPSE is closer to what happens… with MAYBE a recover after.

    Once you understand that then you realise that losing 70% of humanity becomes a possible bet… 6 billion people… some internationally respected scientists see unforeseen combinations of events leading to extinction of humanity. They do so for very good reasons… no they’re not depressed.

    Humans have very little genetic variability… both in men and women… it suggests we’ve almost gone extinct at least twice… and palaeontology gives evidence for a third close call.

    So 6 million dead is pretty conservative… compared to that.

    Terrorism is a joke next to what’s coming.

    • Bill

      Hey genius,take your progressive “population control” bullshit to the HufPo. :twisted:

    • bacongreasenapalm

      I had to re-read the post…What the fuck are you talking about?…Dipshit.

      As far as population control…You go first, please.

      Do you post incoherent ramblings on all websites or just the really great ones like Pats?

      DIPSHIT.

    • Jim D

      My reply to your post is that the wrong type of people are breeding like rabbits. The majority of working folks in my area have sometimes 1 usually 2 kids, That they provide for and try to raise to be respectful adults. The welfare dirtbags have 4-5-6-7 kids from multiple fathers that are little pricks! The kids are groomed from the beginning that the world owes them a living and can’t restart the cycle fast enough, Some at age 14 or 15.

    • Lock and Load

      So Jed, do we just ignore terrorism then, while we get a a handle on “sustainability” :?: :roll: You are dwelling in the realm of scientific conjecture, talking about things that are computer models and statistical calculations… A nuclear warhead being detonated in a major Western city is not conjecture, nor will its effect be the deaths of just “a few thousand”… Is the threat of that really less important than sustainability concerns:???:

  • Paul

    How the heck do yous secure 4000 miles of border, much of it through wilderness? You also have to realize that would affect trade, and guess who is each others largest trading partners? The more sensible solution is for Americans & Canadians to work together to make sure terrorists do not get past the North American perimeter & tracking them down if they do. Logically if a terrorist from abroad was going to strike an American (Or Canadian target) it would make far more sense for them to enter the country direct than have to deal with 2 border crossings.

    • bacongreasenapalm

      Chinese did it a couple thousand years ago.
      -just sayin’ :roll:

      Although, I’m much less concerned with our northern border than our southern. At least the hosers have some amount of immigration control.

  • SCBikerChick

    I THINK what ol’ Jed is trying to say is something about unsustainability in general or not enough production and people starving as a result. That, or he’s talking about the old plan to put all us “incorrigible” types into a place we can’t get out of and, well, population control. I give him the benefit of the doubt simply because of that last sentence about terrorism being a joke compared to what’s coming. It’s like he meanders around but eventually gets to the meat of it. Wish he’d just skipped straight to the last sentence and saved us the grief.

  • Chuck O

    If border control is the issue, then build 2 fences along the entire length of the border with a 2 lane road running between those 2 fences.

    On either side of the fence is no grass or shrubs for 50 feet and wire at the base and top of each fence.

    Then have patrols drive up and down that road that runs between the fences.

    To do anything else such as build a fence that covers only 100 miles or some electronic crap is just wasting money and is not effective.

    For illegals already here, round them up and ship them out.

  • GRIZZ

    Holy shit,if common sense was a bus,Joe missed it 20 years ago