Home  »  General  »  “Forcefully Rejecting Rebublican Budget-Cutting Plans”: In Major, Combative Speech Today, Obama Lays Out Agenda To Continue Communist Revolution By Feigning Deficit Reduction

“Forcefully Rejecting Rebublican Budget-Cutting Plans”: In Major, Combative Speech Today, Obama Lays Out Agenda To Continue Communist Revolution By Feigning Deficit Reduction



Apr 13, 2011 7 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

WASHINGTON (AP) – Forcefully rejecting Republican budget cutting plans, President Barack Obama on Wednesday proposed lowering the nation’s future deficits by $4 trillion over a dozen years with a package that includes reducing spending on politically sensitive health care programs and raising taxes on high-earning Americans.

The president recommended trimming the growth of Medicare spending, cuts in defense, an overhaul of the tax system to eliminate many loopholes enjoyed by individuals and corporations, and an end to Bush-era tax cuts for wealthier Americans.

“We have to live within our means, we have to reduce our deficit, and we have to get back on a path that will allow us to pay down our debt,” Obama said in a combative speech at George Washington University.

As much a policy speech as it was a political address, Obama laid the blame for the rising debt on the spending increases and tax cuts enacted during the presidency of George W. Bush and the recession that struck in late 2007. “We lost our way,” he said.

Ensuring that the nation’s fiscal troubles will be at the center of the 2012 presidential election, Obama drew sharp contrasts with a Republican plan that cuts about $5.8 trillion in spending over the next decade and which the White House says unfairly singles out middle-class taxpayers, older adults and the poor. He pointedly noted that the GOP plan has already been embraced by some Republican presidential candidates.

Such cuts, he said, “paint a vision of our future that’s deeply pessimistic.”

“Their vision,” he added, “is less about reducing the deficit than it is about changing the basic social compact in America.”

Obama previewed his proposals to congressional leaders Wednesday morning. And even before he delivered his speech, top Republicans were pushing back.

“If we’re going to resolve our differences and do something meaningful, raising taxes will not be part of that,” House Speaker John Boehner declared shortly after his White House meeting.

This new clash comes just a week after the president announced he would seek re-election. For the past two months, Obama has been arguing for protection of his core spending priorities, including education and innovation. His turn to deficit reduction reflects the pressures he faces in a divided Congress and with a public increasingly anxious about the nation’s debt, now exceeding $14 trillion.

“Any serious plan to tackle our deficit will require us to put everything on the table, and take on excess spending wherever it exists in the budget,” the president said.

To help enforce budget discipline, the president called for resurrecting a spending cap that would be triggered if the nation’s debt did not stabilize and begin to decline by 2014. The cap would not apply to Social Security, low-income programs or Medicare benefits.

The president’s plan, outlined in a seven-page White House fact sheet, draws many of its ideas from the December recommendations of Obama’s bipartisan fiscal commission, which proposed $4 trillion in deficit reduction over 10 years. As in the commission’s plan, three quarters of the deficit reduction would come from spending cuts, including lower interest payments as the debt eases. One quarter, or $1 trillion, would come from additional tax revenue.

For the White House, the speech comes as Obama pushes Congress to raise the limit on the national debt, which will permit the government to borrow more and thus meet its financial obligations. The country will reach its debt limit of $14.3 trillion by May 16. The Treasury Department has warned that failure to raise the limit by midsummer would drive up the cost of borrowing and destroy the economic recovery.

In laying out his plan, the president is wading into a potential political thicket. Liberals are loath to making cuts in prized Democratic programs like Medicare and Medicaid, and in Social Security. Moderates worry that his plan could unravel bipartisan deficit-cutting negotiations. And Republicans reject any proposal that includes tax increases.

The proposal calls for cutting $770 billion from non-defense domestic spending by 2023. That figure does not include spending on major benefit programs like Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. The plan also would reduce defense spending by $400 billion during the same 12 years.

Obama envisions spending cuts in Medicare and Medicaid of $480 billion through 2023. Those are in addition to the $500 billion in reductions over 10 years from projected increases in Medicare spending contained in the health care law Congress passed and Obama signed last year.

The president’s planned health care reductions include vague proposals to lower Medicaid costs and reduce Medicare prescription drug expenses.

While the White House concedes that Social Security is facing pressure from an aging population, Obama did not specify any changes to the national retirement system other than calling for bipartisan efforts to “strengthen the program.”


  • http://HBCIndy.com Dr. Jerry

    He was lying…his lips were moving!

  • derised1

    LoL! Obama still blaming Bush.

    Betcha Obama will blame Bush when he loses in 2012. :roll:

  • Amy

    This man couldn’t possibly legally win in 2012. My fear is voter fraud (ie Acorn etc.) or he will try to grant the illegals amnesty and give them the right to vote.

    • Tyler

      These budget plans have no legally binding measures – I will wager with anyone that the sum spending at the end of 2011 will outweigh 2010 – budget cuts, my ass

  • Jim up north

    He nows goddamn well that any american paying the least little bit of attention knows he is full of shit! He is just bidding for more time, he knows the higher in debt we climb the harder we fall. He and his commies will be there to restart the system the way they want it.

  • Vivek

    “He was lying”
    “Obama still blaming Bush”
    “he is full of shit”

    Facts please: or its just paranoia. What I hear in these comments is that you were worried that what he said might be true.

    Well I checked the Republican plan and, yes it does include a tax cut for the rich. I checked the job stats on Bush’s time in office and no there was no jobs boom after the last one. When I checked out GDP against debt I saw that, as he said, in the 80s Reagan took debt up… in the 90s it was cut… in the 2000s Bush pushed it up again. When I read about why I found that Ronald Reagan’s economic adviser encouraged the production of debt as a was of forcing state spending down… and I saw Dick Cheney telling an economic adviser, who resigned because of it, “Debt doesn’t matter anymore”.

    I checked out who started Americas latest big corporations: Apple, Microsoft, Oracle, Intel, Cisco, Facebook, Amazon… and it wasn’t the rich. It was the middle class.

    And I’m guessing you guys aren’t rich. So unless you have some facts to back up the comments I suggest you cut the self-loathing and understand that the US has been richest when the middle-class have been thriving NOT the rich.

    As inequality in the US has risen, since the 60s Americas economy has gone into debt.

    I’m a capitalist but I don’t have my head up my ass. Face up to what’s being done in your name or, if you haven’t the guts, then get out of the debate.

    • midTN

      Who are YOU to tell ANYONE to “get out of the debate”…

      …asshole!

      :gun: