Home  »  US News  »  Campus Crusade For Christ Takes “Christ” Out Of Name, Says “It Was Getting In The Way”

Campus Crusade For Christ Takes “Christ” Out Of Name, Says “It Was Getting In The Way”



Jul 21, 2011 17 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Change “Our name was becoming more and more of a hindrance.” to “Jesus’s name was becoming more and more of a hindrance.”

Fox News:

One of the nation’s most prominent Christian ministries has decided to take Christ out of its name – a move that has generated cries of political correctness from within the evangelical community.

Campus Crusade for Christ International announced this week that it will change the name of its U.S. Operations to “Cru” in early 2012.

“We felt like our name was getting in the way of accomplishing our mission,” said Steve Sellers, the vice president for Campus Crusade, noting that the ministry will still be committed to “proclaiming Christ around the world.”

Sellers said researchers found that 9 percent of Christians and 20 percent of non-Christians were alienated by the name Campus Crusade for Christ.

The organization was founded in 1951 by Bill and Vonette Bright and today has 25,000 staff members serving in 191 countries. Bright died in 2003, but his widow offered support for the name change in a video posted online.

“When Bill Bright started the organization, he told his wife that someday they would have to change the name,” Sellers said. “As early as the late ’70s and ’80s he was looking at making the name change.”

Sellers said several factors were involved in the name change – including overseas sensitivities.

“Our name was becoming more and more of a hindrance,” he told Fox News Radio. He specifically mentioned the word crusade.

“It’s reverted back to some of its meaning related to the Middle Ages – forcing Christianity on different parts of the world,” he said.

As for removing Christ from their name, the Campus Crusade for Christ website states:

“We were not trying to eliminate the word Christ from our name. We were looking for a name that would most effectively serve our mission and help us take the gospel to the world. Our mission has not changed. Cru enables us to have discussions about Christ with people who might initially be turned off by a more overtly Christian name. We believe that our interaction and our communication with the world will be what ultimately honors and glorifies Christ.”

But that decision has created controversy within the evangelical Christian community – some taking to social networking sites and the organization’s website to voice their displeasure.

“Take Christ out, and you become just another crusade,” one critic wrote on the Campus Crusade website. “How repulsive can you get?” Another person wrote, “We are both appalled that you think you have to remove the name Christ from your name.”

“It is sad that an organization like Campus Crusade at least appears to have allowed themselves to be taken by the politically correct environment instead of acting counter culturally as Christ’s followers are called to do,” said Richard Hornsby, of Kansas City. “For an institution like Crusade to appear to cave to the same cultural pressure that leads school principals to harass or try to ban Christian groups from meeting on campus is incredibly sad. We expect the ACLU to intimidate small towns and schools by threatening to sue them. We don’t expect long-standing pillars of the Christian community to fold like this.”

Hornsby was actively involved with Campus Crusade at The Ohio State University when he was a college student. He said he was surprised by the name change.

“I immediately thought of Paul’s letter to the Romans, ‘I am not ashamed of the gospel of Christ,’” he said. “It may be that CCCI has good intentions behind the change, but on its face, this decision to drop ‘Christ’ seems like an attempt to hide or mask the core identity of the group.”

But Sellers defended the removal of Christ’s name from the title – and denied that political correctness was involved.
“It has nothing to do with political correctness,” he said. “It has everything to do with how we can be effective at what God has called us to do.”

“Most churches don’t have Christ in their name,” he said. “Hardly any other Christian organization has Christ in their name. People are making an issue out of something that isn’t the intent at all.”

Sellers said it is “more important that the organization is effective at proclaiming Jesus than it is important to have the name of Jesus in the name of the organization.”

And he stressed that the mission of the organization has not changed.

“We are an evangelistic organization that is committed and has been committed and will be committed to proclaiming Christ around the world,” he said.

The new name, Cru, has long been used as a nickname for the organization on university campuses. Other than that, Sellers said Cru does not have a definition.

“Much like lots of brand names they don’t necessarily have meaning in and of themselves,” he said. “It is a name we intend to give meaning so that when people hear it they know that it’s a caring group of Christians who are passionate about lifting up the name of Jesus.”


  • Steevypaaw

    It is not Christ’s then…Any people that would state that the name of their savior is a hindrance is deceived and in a state of delusions. Instead of lifting up the name of Jesus Christ the organization is ashamed of it, so, I guess Jesus the Christ can state the same precedent when those stand before him, and he says…”Depart you who work sin, I NEVER knew you…”

    I know that I will not ever support any supposed Christian organization that is too hindered by the name of God.

  • Steevypaaw

    It is not Christ’s then…Any people that would state that the name of their savior is a hindrance is deceived and in a state of delusions. Instead of lifting up the name of Jesus Christ the organization is ashamed of it, so, I guess Jesus the Christ can state the same precedent when those stand before him, and he says…”Depart you who work sin, I NEVER knew you…”

    I know that I will not ever support any supposed Christian organization that is too hindered by the name of God.

  • Momotous

    One of the other problems I see here is falling prey to PC history.  “It’s reverted back to some of its meaning related to the Middle Ages –
    forcing Christianity on different parts of the world,” he said.  That is not true and is a false history that has been spread.  The crusades were not forcing Christianity on the
    world through conquest, but it was a defense of western Europe against
    the onslaught of the Muslims who from the time of Mohamed until then had
    taken over all of the middle east and most of Europe, threatening to
    take over the world.

  • http://touchstonesjests.blogspot.com/ TouchStone

    Cowards.

  • http://touchstonesjests.blogspot.com/ TouchStone

    Cowards.

  • Turnkeygin

    same as the fig tree they will produce no more fruit. this will be the end for that school

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Evelyn-Johnsey/1411618526 Evelyn Johnsey

    If Christ is removed from the name, then will His blood be removed from the message,as well? I have always held this organization in high regards for campus ministry. No more.

  • ATTILA

    Another former worthwhile group being infiltrated by the enemy.

  • Anonymous

    If they are legitimately concerned about offending others, perhaps they should drop the word “crusade” with all of its historical baggage – instead, they drop Christ and focus on the crusade part with “cru”…. doesn’t make any sense. Christ said that His name would be an offense to some, so get over the “offense” and get on with the message He gave you in His name!

  • Steve

    “But Sellers defended the removal of Christ’s name…”
    It’ll be bad enough answering for myself at the Judgement Seat of Christ(ouch, did I really say His name?), glad I don’t have to answer for him!

  • Mauricebates

    when they they took Christ out of the name they changed it to crud. Live in hell!!!

  • Mark Millage

    32″Therefore everyone who confesses Me before men, I will also confess him before My Father who is in heaven.33  “But whoever denies Me before men, I will also deny him before My Father who is in heaven. “Matthew 10:32-33

  • Valsma

    Who are you working for? who told you the name was a hindrance? Christ is the way, that is your message. If you are as evangelistic org. and committed to proclaiming Christ, you would not remove His name.

  • http://twitter.com/matt_mccomas matt_mccomas

    A little harsh don’t you think. You really want someone to live in hell because they changed a name?

  • http://twitter.com/matt_mccomas matt_mccomas
  • http://twitter.com/matt_mccomas matt_mccomas

    Christ wasn’t the hindrance. It was Campus and Crusade that were hard to deal with. Read more on the name change here. http://www.ccci.org/about-us/donor-relations/our-new-name/commitment-to-christ.htm

  • Franz Williams

    EXACTLY !!! 

    BOTTOM LINE – THE “ORG” is ASHAMED of THE GOSPEL.
    YES – ASHAMED OF “CHRIST”

    “CRU” has been ineffective for CHRIST for a VERY LONG TIME so I am not at all surprised about the name change . When an “ORG” changes it’s name, the under current has existed under the “ORG” for a very long time and this is the case with “CRU”.  

    Dropping their name is just the top of the iceberg we see. No surprise. They’ve been LUKE WARM FOR DECADES NOW. So their name change is now parallel to their ORG (without the word CHRIST).

    Matter of fact, the heavenly hosts are probably rejoicing because CRU has been operating as most of the 7 churches described in Revelation for decades. DUH !

    I feel bad for the young adults that are just coming into the “ORG”. They’re so watered down – they can’t see what truth is…

    …let alone effectively STAND for it.

    A perfect fit – I say!