Punk put enough bling on that rifle to make a K-Mart commando jealous.

Explosives AND 80+ confirmed in less than a couple hours?

WHERE did that asshole get his training?

This is beginning to sound more and more like a JFK “Oswald Conspiracy” or OKC Islamics had white-boy help to me…..

I watch lots of Bond movies, and a pretty good BBC spy show called MI-5 (aka Spooks) and this guy acts like he got almost SAS or SEAL quality training!

He got it from somewhere like Elohim City or Yemeni training camps…….

Does anyone here know how to grab this PDF off of Google Docs so one can save it to their own private database?
 
My rig’s a PC running Microsoft XP.
 
All useful suggestions appreciated… thanks.

boff

one more barge

Isn’t Breivik’s flatform the same as Ayan Hirshi and MP Gert from Holland?
Do you know the latter two?

I have no hardine opinion, just a curious adult trying to understand the two sides of a coin. You tube US professor  on exponential growth explained the demographics.

http://dc186.2shared.com/download/7_M9C66M/2083-AEuropeanDeclarationofInd.pdf?tsid=20110723-211545-2f41ba67

OR

http://www.kevinislaughter.com/wp-content/uploads/2083+-+A+European+Declaration+of+Independence.pdf

Oh the company you keep, Mr. Dollard.  Christians can stoop as low as Jihadis.

What mirror images, violent youths with an insane fear of the Other.

This murderer is clearly a follower of the militant Roman Catholic model, whether he is Catholic himself is still an open question. The news media and the Norway police labeled him as a “Christian Fundamentalist” and now Bible Christians everywhere are being tagged as potential terrorists.

Clearly this man forgot or doesn’t care about one of the Ten Commandments which forbids murder, and the command of Jesus to turn the other cheek instead of taking revenge.

Being a policeman, soldier, sailor, airman, marine is ok; being a murderer is not ok and clearly whatever he calls himself, he doesn’t believe in obeying a Book that some people have said that he believes in. Please don’t join the bandwagon of blaming Bible Christians for this man’s deluded motivations.

Well ! I have the same question: WHERE did that guy get his training?

Thank you Billy for this further explanation. Especially the way you describe the current development of “joining the bandwagon”.

So far today I’ve encountered several disrupting ways of pointing fingers towards anyone Christians, patriotic, with fair skin blue eyes and blond hair, critical against the bloodshed by Islam, wearing a uniform, conservative or weary about immigration.
Forces are around and about to blame Geert Wilders for what happened. Especially now Breivik’s video has emerged, dubbed as Fitna II.

Seems to me the blaming-game is in full speed except for whatever triggered this tragic event. And only extreme political correctness is the talk of the day.

Could it be this massacre is about forcing too many people into oblivious political correctness, (getting shuted-up),  which leaves them no other way of expressing their meaning than by acting up in such a barbaric way as on last Friday in Norwegia? (Breivik has made clear he wants a political platform in many ways including telling the police he likes to explain his intentions fully in court on monday.)

Are we on the brink of total denial about what’s happening in the Old Country (Europe) as result of the massacre?. (A new kind of “Don’t ask, don’t tell”.)

Is this denial forced upon us after last Friday and if so, what will be the results of it? (More molly-cudling for known extreme Islam supporters leading way towards exactly Breitvik tried to warn for?)

Will this result in more and further aggresive reactions/restrictions against any one and anything clearly critical about libtard ideas and/or laws?

Will the clear and meaningfull messages that can be read too in Breitvik’s manifest get lost for what they are? (Warnings about what is happening right under our nose.)

Mind you, to any one reading this comment of mine:
I do NOT support the act of Breitvik in any way at all. By bombing and shooting people he’s submitted into exact the same acts which he condemns.
(Wordlwide bloodshed and hatred by an idealistic and oppressived socalled religion which hides between the idle word of “peacefull”, meaning Islam.)
A very stupid choice indeed that is obvious very harmfull considering the effect and developing anti-feelings towards Christian orientated people and everything else the visual image (uniform, guns, Viking appearance) of Breitvik is standing for.

But it seems to me right now everything left-winged leaders and followers warn for, discrimination e.g., is happening by the way those same left winged leaders and followers are abusing the horrible events for their own gain. Yes, pointing fingers towards innocent and…….there by discriminating en further demonishing those who have NO part in this, do NOT support what happened.
But also: ”If whe don’t mention the whole truth there’s enough room for more lies”. Further enforcing a future for more libtard crazyness yet to come. 

How ironic!

It’s a typicall Dutch way ever since Van Gogh got murdered to describe what’s happening right now with the words;
“The bullet came from….the left”. 

Lord have mercy upon us. Pandora’s box has been opened.

I don’t see anything Christian in war-propagnada, xenophobia  and racism. Berwick seems to be a neopaganist

Video Games

Where does Jesus say that wars are ok? Killing for your country because you have a damn uniform doesn’t stop you being a murderer.

You evidently need to read your Bible and familiarize yourself with history.  War is not only Christian, but sometimes necessary.  It’s as true today as it was in the times of the crusades and biblical times.  God is not touchy-feely, or should I say, a liberal.  He expects you to fight for His cause.

Thank you for making that clarification.  Many interpret the commandment as “thou shalt not kill” whereas it is more correctly interpreted as “thou shall not murder”.  The difference being there are circumstances where taking a life (e.g., self defense) is permissible. 

Soldiers fighting for a righteous  cause are perfectly entitled to slay their enemies.  Over time we have narrowed the definition of what killing is permissible and what weapons may be used or not used … but these are man’s laws.

As for “turning the other cheek” I believe many Bible scholars will tell you that Jesus was not forbidding self defense.  He was encouraging one to live peacefully and not take rise to petty insults or provocations.

But that’s just my interpretation of the Word.

you choose “download original” on File

Andrew Brevik is nothing but a racist. His slaughtering of innocent children and people is the product of hate. He has also neglected the Bible and common decent law of humanity “Love thy neighbor.”

King David wrote most of the Psalms, yet he was the greatest king that Israel ever had, and the greatest warrior that Israel ever had. God never considered him a murderer until he did in Uriah. God did hold him responsible for his action but as king of his nation, he shed the blood of probably thousands of the enemies of Israel with the sword. He was both a servant of God and a great warrior. There is no contradiction between those things in the Bible. The distinction between taking life when acting as the representative of your nation charged with its defense internally or externally and taking life on your own initiative is a very big one in the Bible. Your life is considered forfeit by God when its the latter, but you are “a minister of God”.

“Let every soul be subject to the higher authorities: for there is no authority but of God: the authorities that exist are appointed by God. Whosoever therefore resists the authority, resists the ordinance of God; and they that resist shall receive condemnation to themselves: for rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Will you then not be afraid of the authority? Do that which is good, and you shall have praise of the same: for he is the minister of God to you for good. But if you do that which is evil, be afraid: for he does not carry the sword in vain: for he is the minister of God, an avenger to execute wrath upon him that does evil.” Romans 13:1-4

But when its the former, you are a “minister of God” (my comment left out some important words)

I asked where Jesus says it’s ok to go to war.

I got it, thanks everyone.

It’s a sickness…

Don’t they make a lot of money preaching against Islam..????

Don’t they make a lot of money preaching against Islam..????

i dont understand why he killed his own,but i will say sorry hes for real n knows this world n what the govo r doin to it for what for them to take ova the somilons the muslims there all here takin whats ours why is it that there country can treat em howeva yet they come here n get everything we dont no how to FIGHT FOR OUR COUNTRY ANYMORE TRUE HEROES FOUGHT FOR WHAT WAS OURS N NEVER LAID IT BARE ON THE TABLE FOR OTHERS TO CLAIM COME ON WAKE UP HES UST A NORMAL MAN WHO CAN SEE WHATS GOIN ON WEATHER HE IS JEW CHRISTAIN CATHOLIC HE SAYIN HE ENT MUSLIM N THERE COMIN FOR US ALL IF WE ENT MUSLIM I GET THIS, BUT WHY GO N KILL ALL UR OWN TO GET THIS UT OUT THERE DONT MAKE SENCE!!!!

every religion believes they are superior to all others

The original Hebrew language distinguishes between killing  and murder and only the latter is outlawed.  When the Roman soldiers went to John the Baptist and said, “And what shall we do” [to obtain repentence], he didn’t tell them to leave the military.  If I was in an emergency, I’d trust a man or woman who had served in our armed services before almost anyone.  The vast majority are self-sacrificing and honorable.  An American Army Sergeant in New York recently ran onto a burning bus to rescue people trapped inside.  What would you have done?

Your tone is rather hate-filled, wouldn’t you say?  Painting people with the same large brush smacks of extreme bias and also extreme ignorance.  You sound like you have the same level of hate against Christians that Anders Breivik has against Muslims.

Great post, Jeanet.  It’s good to hear from someone in Europe. People who are painting all Christians with the same broad brush as Anders Breivik are not ignorant but agenda-based.  It’s obvious that despicable people have been waiting for an opportunity to slander Christians in order to further their agendas, whatever they might be.  I’ve long-thought that churches in the U.S. should invest in a common public relations firm to discount misrepresentations and lies about Christians and Christianity.  However, there’s one valid criticism: TV evangelists who keep begging viewers for money while Rome burns.   

The night Judas betrayed him, Jesus told his disciples: “If you don’t have a sword, sell your cloak and buy one.”  (Luke 22:36)  Jewish Christians, very law-abiding people who respected the authorities over them, didn’t know they were about to face extreme persecutions and attempts upon their lives.

where does Jesus say that it’s ok to go to war – defending one’s self is not the same thing as illegally invading a foreign country and killing hundreds of thousands.

The idea of Christians supporting wars such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam is fucking disgusting. And I’m pretty sure that Jesus would agree.

where does Jesus say that it’s ok to go to war – defending one’s self is not the same thing as illegally invading a foreign country and killing hundreds of thousands.

The idea of Christians supporting wars such as Iraq, Afghanistan, Vietnam is fucking disgusting. And I’m pretty sure that Jesus would agree.

Christians have left a legacy of devastation everywhere….supplanting native religions, killing people who refuse to follow the dogma…..we’ve had war after war after war over nothing but religion…yet you call me hatefilled, simply because I point this out…. interesting.

Hey everyone! Billy is a moron sock-puppet!

Billy is a philosemite, agent provocatuer!

Billy is a philosemite, agent provocatuer!

I just see a shitty tiny boy who tries to be seen as big man. Disgusting.
If life is so misrible, why you did not sleep under atrain.

25 year old children??? Is your last name palm?

25 year old children??? Is your last name palm?

Your comments shows how atheists are the true haters! Communists are murdering, atheistic scum! and so are YOU!

Me thinks there is a lot of bloodshed and hate worldwide right at this moment.

On March 27th I visited the grave of a former colleague. He got blown to pieces. By a hatefilled Muslim.

He was from Jewish origin but was one of the first to sign up.
For a Nato-mission to save Muslims from hatefilled Serbs.

I dunno intolerance of all other faiths, wants to wipe out Islam, I could see how he might look to the “old Catholic Church” as it was before it had competition of protestant churches, and remembered it’s purpose was religious and not governmental.  Freemasonry was pretty much founded as a place where people could have an alternative view to the catholic church without being in fear of life and limb from that tyrany. However the Freemasons are quite the opposite of his views. They have always accepted Christians of all denominations (including catholic, you’d be suprised how many catholcs are masons), Jews, Muslims, Brahmins etc as long as they believe in a creator, it is a brotherhood for all mankind. Freemasonry isn’t a religion but has always pushed tolerance between faiths, and has been anti religious fundementalism and religious extremist. This nations ideas of freedom of religion, were not natural at the founding. Many colonies had “state religions” Baptists were wipped and beaten in virginia because it was Church of England/Episcapalion only…our ideals for freedom of religion came out of Masonry as did much of our constitution, and bill of rights. This guy did become a mason, but I’m clueless why as their views are completely opposite of his own. He probably thought it would make him somehow more elite.

Christian nations gave the world Modern Democratic Republics,  rights to common citizens and not just nobility, and the most peaceful nations on earth. They have fostered nations that value human life of all races….Look to the world and see where Tyranny is worst, where people have no rights, where violence is sued by the government against their own people for just speaking out……where would you feel safest saying something against the government and local religion? America? Britian? or say India? China? Iran? Anywhere in Africa? Devestation and tyranny was the status quo until Christian nations emerged. Not since the old Zoroastrian Persions before they were overtaken by Islam has there been any other nations that respected freedom of common citizens.

He used a smart gimick he dressed as the help that people would expect to arrive. had them come to him….Shooting people at close range with no where to run, and having 90 minutes on an island to yourself and your victims doesn’t take much more then steady aim. The reports say he was calm and made single shots, anyone can practice awhile and get to his level of accuracy. The calmness however as he’s killing children…..he’s clearly a sociopath…you can’t train that, he just has not feeling or empathy for others. However this wasn’t rage, he was calm and careful. There’s crazy, and then there’s pure evil….this guy is evil.  He probably did have 12 months in Norways military though, most every male citizen does. I doubt they have that much significant training for anything like that.

Where did I say I was a pacifist, you fucking prick? I asked where Jesus said it was ok to go to war, because that’s what the original commentator suggested.

Do you get the point now, fucknugget?

You also said, “Killing for your country because you have a damn uniform doesn’t stop you being a murderer. ”

News flash Jesus was Jewish, and if he doesn’t say otherwise, then he’s likely holding the Jewish view which considers murder and killing as a soldier for your people to be seperate and uses different words. I get the point fine , you theogically FAIL. Jesus never once mentions overturning that view. Also, 1 Samuel 15:18 says, “Go and completely destroy those wicked people, the Amalekites; make war on them until you have wiped them out.”  It is the Christian belief that Jesus and God are one. God does not reverse himself.

You didn’t point anything out.  You labeled Christians as “ALL hate-filled,” the same way a bigot labels all Jews or all Muslims all Mormons.  By the way, Jesus predicted that people would commit evil acts in his name which would cause him to tell them when he returns, “Get away from me, you evil doers.”  Not everyone who sits in a church pew or reads the Bible is a Christian.  The night before Jesus died, he said, “I give you a new commandment.  Love one another.  This is how the world will know you’re my disciples.”  There was nothing Christian about the Crusades (many of the participants were hired mercenaries with no compulsions about robbing and raping and murdering innocent people).  The Native Americans were treated shamefully but there were some Christians and especially the Quakers who fought for their rights.  A close friend of mine who was a full-blooded Native American (she lived on a reservation which I visited for years) had a grandmother who had been abducted by another tribe as a child.  Her body was tattoed to signify she was a slave.  Let’s not romanticize human nature.  If you were such a good person, you’d find ways to build bridges rather than alienate people.

Does anyone find it strange that Breivik saved up a considerable amount of
money so he could spend it on two “whores” a few days before he committed his
atrocities?  It was an integral part of his overall plan and he explains it in
his manifesto.  There is a documented pattern of Muslim Jihadists doing the same
thing before their suicide bombings, including some of the Jihadists who took
down the Twin Towers.

I think my country got hit by a Christian, not a Muslim. I think we should be aware of the danger of extremism and fundamentalism no matter what shape or form.

stupid man!

stupid man!

He thinks he is a knight, a crusader. I think it is pretty obvious that he is Christian. He talks about his actions being like that of a martyr, and identifies himself as Christian. When someone tries to distort or deny that fact, what they are in fact doing is denying Breiviks right to define himself as a Christian, based on personal convictions.

He thinks he is a knight, a crusader. I think it is pretty obvious that he is Christian. He talks about his actions being like that of a martyr, and identifies himself as Christian. When someone tries to distort or deny that fact, what they are in fact doing is denying Breiviks right to define himself as a Christian, based on personal convictions.

Actually he calls on the European people to read crusader-litterature, and hails the crusader popes and their actions. He is wildly fascinated with Pan-Europeanism, and consider his actions as a service to Christian Europe. Of course he is not catholic, but that was never in question either, since there are very few Catholics in Norway. On the other hand it matters little what denomination he grew up in, but how and why he viewed immigration policies in Europe as a demographic weapon of Islamification of Europe, and why he wanted to harm the politicians he claims made the Islamic threat develop uncontrolled. You cant deny that religion has a part to play in this terrible event that hurt Norway, and that by religion we mean Christianity and Islam and their history of demonizing each other. 

This is the product of a man who has been inspired by the so-called counter-jihad groups flourishing on the internet. They think they are the only ones who understand the reality, and some of them will do anything to make their Europe Islam-free so that a European, Christian culture can once again be at peace from the Jihad they feel are directed towards Europe. 

ABB directed his anger against the instigators as he would call them; the cultural maxists who has made Europe a multicultural society against Europeans’ will, and who controls EU and 80 % of all political parties in Europe. These are traitors that are considered the root of the problem of Islamification. He wanted to attack the problem at its root, save Europe. He wanted to be our savior, but sadly,  his ideology is humbug, and his convictions led him to cause the ugliest attack since WW2 in Noway, though, killing over 70 yougsters from all over Norway, at gun point, has to be one of the worst acts a human can do. He suggests we will understand him some decades from now. His act was not a crime, but a necessary evil in protecting Europe’s identity. Where his hate came from?I am very sure it was not from God, or indeed the Devil or any other superhuman agent. I will not say that it is because just of Islam or because of just Christianity, but I would say he tapped into some of the nastiest of European extreme nationalist, anti-Islamic ideologues’ ideas and put them into practice. This is a collective European crisis even tough this attack has affected Norway mostly. But we all need to pull out the skeletons from the closets and talk  more together. We need to reach out to each other more than before. We need to visit our neighbors from other cultures and bond stronger with them. We are all human, we are all sisters and brothers, and if we all show a little more love and interest in each other, and discuss even the hard themes of our society we can prevail. The solution is never to give up, never to hurt others, always treat each other respectful and let the word be holy. Free words for all. Especially more free words for those who feel undermined. And Christians and Muslims with a conviction to be good in Gods name should now more than ever come together and work for a better future all across this one Earth we share with all other people instead of condemning the acts as those of a crazy Christian or those of a crazy loner who definitely cant be Christian.”If one person can create that much evil, just think how much love we all can create together”

Much has been said about the “religion” of this madman – we need to put this “christian” crap to bed…  This man is no more a Christian than Hugh Hefner!!!  Some information is available which makes it seem that to be called “christian” in Norway is as generic as being called “white” or “black”…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pi3yn33s308&feature=youtu.be

If anyone actually reads his manifesto, they will see that he distances himself from God and traditional Christianity…
http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=325765
…so let us stop pretending that he is a Christian or that he represents any kind of true Christianity, or that we have anything to be afraid of from followers of Christ when it comes to terrorism.

If anything, this whole event has been a false flag op, managed by jihadists, to get the European spotlight on someone else besides jihadists, so that they can continue with their plans with less scrutiny. Remember, they do not care who is killed in the process, as long as islam is the victor.

Breivik did not define himself as a traditional christian… do you even know what a traditional christian is, or what they identify with? Certainly not this behavior!!!  His personal convictions, as claimed in his own manifesto, did not place him in the theological camp of a majority of practicing Christians, so I am not denying him a right – he did not take up that right to begin with!!!!
His conviction to be a martyr is NOT only a christian identification – martyrdom is a major tenet of islam, so don’t go there, it is a poor argument to identify him as christian. That is like saying because he posted on “fundamentalist” websites he was a “fundamentalist”…  many far left lunatics love to troll on this website, but that does not make them conservative. Breivik was not a true Christian – by his definition in his own manifesto.

Breivik did not define himself as a traditional christian… do you even know what a traditional christian is, or what they identify with? Certainly not this behavior!!!  His personal convictions, as claimed in his own manifesto, did not place him in the theological camp of a majority of practicing Christians, so I am not denying him a right – he did not take up that right to begin with!!!!
His conviction to be a martyr is NOT only a christian identification – martyrdom is a major tenet of islam, so don’t go there, it is a poor argument to identify him as christian. That is like saying because he posted on “fundamentalist” websites he was a “fundamentalist”…  many far left lunatics love to troll on this website, but that does not make them conservative. Breivik was not a true Christian – by his definition in his own manifesto.

Please don’t ask me if I “even know what a traditional Christianity is. Please ask yourself if you are the one to judge who is and who is not a Christian. He may have different christianity than yours, but in general one must let a person decide for themselves what religion they have. Breivik has explained he is a (kind of) Christian, and even though we all may feel disgusted by his actions and perhaps his thoughts, we may never deny him the right to have his own religious conviction of which he may name what ever he wants. Christianity serves as an integral part of his thoughts, even if it is a kind of christianity that seems absurd to others. I will just leave this quote from Breiviks manifesto. When you read it I want you to look at how integral Christianity is to his ideology. 

“3.152 Justiciar Knights, Martyrdom vs. Suicide
There is normally absolutely no justification or excuse to commit suicide. It is a shameful,
selfish and cowardly act which normally can and should never be justified. According to
the canon laws of the Catholic Church; any individual who commits suicide will forever
burn in hell as suicide is considered the gravest of sins, similar to that of murder. The
definition of suicide by the Christian faith is explained in the following manner; to commit
suicide is to “throw away Gods most divine gift”, the gift of life. And anyone who willingly
throws this gift away will forever burn in hell without any chance for redemption.
Then you have other Christian denominations like Protestantism who literally propagates
a view which nullifies the meaning of hell, good deeds, martyrdom and sainthood
altogether. According to Protestant laws (for a majority of denominations), you will not go
to hell regardless of the fact that you have committed suicide for any imaginable reason.
As long as you turn to Jesus before death occurs, all will be forgiven… Not only have the
Protestant views made a mockery of every Christian historical codex, it has also severely
undermined the practice and glorification of good deeds, martyrdom and sainthood. Who
will willingly walk a saint’s path involving pain, sacrifice and martyrdom if there is no
distinction between a paedophile rapist murderer and Saint George of Lydda? I usually
refer to Protestantism as the Marxism of Christianity. As long as you ask forgiveness
before you die you can literally live a life as the most despicable character imaginable.
So, in regards to Catholic canon law, the question is; will Justiciar Knights be rejected in
heaven as they martyr themselves for the cause or have to “self terminate” during or
after an operation, for various reasons?There are several distinctions that have to be made in this regard:
1. A Justiciar Knight martyring himself for the cause and dies from wounds inflicted by system
protectors (police/regime agents)
2. A Justiciar Knight martyring himself for the cause and dies non-intentionally from wounds
inflicted by his own actions (explosion etc.)
3. A Justiciar Knight martyring himself for the cause and dies intentionally from wounds
inflicted by his own actions (explosion etc.) in order to prevent capture. Capture, by the
system protectors working for the multiculturalist regime, could lead to torture and may
result in a scenario where information is extracted involuntarily leading to the
apprehension, and even the murder, of other Justiciar Knights
4. A Justiciar Knight self terminates after apprehension to escape torture and
murder/execution
Points 1-3 are considered standard martyrdom deaths, under canon law, which guarantee
an abundance of grace and the entry to heaven. Point 4, however, is not a clear case of a
martyrdom death but must be seen in perspective to the circumstances. In point 4, a
Justiciar Knight would have fulfilled his pact with God (in which he made during the
initiation rite) which will lead to him acquiring an abundance of grace regardless of
outcome of the operation, as long as he did his best. Because in light of the Knights
Templar initiation rite; the candidate has already forfeited/surrendered his life to God and
the struggle for the preservation of European Christendom. As such, life – God’s gift, has
already been “spent” on the struggle. You cannot “take/kill” something that has already
been voluntarily sacrificed. Therefore, in reference to point 4, God’s gift of life is not
wasted but has instead more or less fully been used in a manner which pleases God. An
individual who receives a life sentence in prison, as a result of his actions relating to the
European Resistance Movement and the liberation of Western Europe from the cultural
Marxist/multiculturalist dictatorships, is not in a position to take away something that has
already been given away. As such, if he chooses to self terminate (not suicide) for logical
reasons, or to prevent torture and certain death (this is a likely scenario in many Western
European prisons as Muslims dominate a majority of them), it is not considered suicide
but will nevertheless take a toll on the amount of grace already acquired. Because a
perfect man, in Gods eyes, should be willing to withstand inhuman suffering for the
duration of his natural life, if required. However, man is flawed by default and will often
be unwilling to face a lifetime of torture in a multiculturalist prison, locked up together
with Jihadists.
Justiciar Knights and martyrdom
To take an illustration; Saint George of Lydda, perhaps THE most celebrated saint,
martyred himself for the Christian faith, for his country and for his people. He knew that
his action would lead to his death, yet he continued down that path well knowing what
would eventually await him. I guess this illustrates the primary distinction between
suicide and martyrdom. Suicide is a selfish act while martyrdom is a selfless act. When
someone commits suicide, they want their pain to end and offer few thoughts for his
family, friends and his people. When a Justiciar Knight martyrs himself for the cause he
walks down a path well knowing what is likely to await him. He chooses this path of
sacrifice, not for his own self serving needs, but for his family, friends, his people, his
culture, his nation and for the preservation of Christendom. As such, he is sacrificing the
most divine gift, life itself, in service of others and in service of God. This is considered to
be the most noble and glories act a human being can ever hope to achieve. This is why
such acts of any Justiciar Knight are directly comparable to that of our guardian saint;
Saint George of Lydda, one of the most celebrated heroes in Christianity.
Any Justiciar Knight, in light of his initiation pledge, has fully committed his life to our
cause. He is therefore standing with one leg thoroughly planted in heaven already as he
has already surrendered his life to God. His remaining service, regardless of outcome is
merely a formality; providing he does the best he can to benefit the cause.
A Justiciar Knight for the Knights Templar, who for tactical reasons, chose to self
terminate during or after an operation is not considered to have “thrown God’s gift away”
as he is a martyr for the Church. He has sacrificed his freedom and his life to secure the
existence of his family, friends, his people, country and the European Church and has
such contributed to prevent European Christendom from being gradually deconstructed
by the cultural Marxist/multiculturalist regimes of Western Europe.
As God knows everything, he is well aware of the intentions and deeds of every Justiciar
Knight. Therefore, to self terminate for strategic or logical reasons (to prevent
information extraction by the enemy which will lead to the apprehension of other Justiciar
Knights), is not considered suicide but an extension of the sacrifice made to our cause.
As such, this final act of sacrifice is added to the amount of good deeds and grace
generated by the individual.
Future considerations for possible veneration of Justiciar Knights
A Justiciar Knight who martyrs himself for the cause, and/or self terminates during or
after an operation for tactical reasons, should be celebrated as martyrs for the Church. It
is expected that the Catholic Church and other denominations of Church authorities in
Europe (and independent canon law experts) acknowledges our sacrifices and defines our
deeds as acts of martyrdom for the Church, according to canon law. The Church should
not have second thoughts on the matter as they are fully aware of the fact that European
Christendom is gradually being deconstructed. It is time that the Pope and his cardinals
begin to resist the deliberate deconstruction of European Christendom. The process
would, however, be quite challenging, but worth the effort as all Justiciar Knights who
dies for their faith will be a great source of inspiration for generations to come. They will
be role models. Certain, exceptionally brave and selfless, Justiciar Knights in the coming
decades should even be considered as candidates for official veneration.

From the compendium “2083″, page 1404-1405

“Q: Are you a religious man, and should science take priority over the teachings
of the Bible?
A: My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion.At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal
path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterbury’s speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain. I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed. We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities.
I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe (government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always continue to be that way.
Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe.”

From the compendium “2083″, page 1404-1405

“Q: Are you a religious man, and should science take priority over the teachings
of the Bible?
A: My parents, being rather secular wanted to give me the choice in regards to religion.At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I consider myself to be 100% Christian. However, I strongly object to the current suicidal
path of the Catholic Church but especially the Protestant Church. I support a Church that believes in self defence and who are willing to fight for its principles and values, at least resist the efforts put forth to exterminate it gradually. The Catholic and Protestant Church are both cheering their own annihilation considering the fact that they embrace the ongoing inter-faith dialogue and the appeasement of Islam. The current Church elite has shown its suicidal face, as vividly demonstrated last year by the archbishop of Canterbury’s speech contemplating the legitimacy of Shariah in parts of Britain. I trust that the future leadership of a European cultural conservative hegemony in Europe will ensure that the current Church leadership are replaced and the systems somewhat reformed. We must have a Church leadership who supports a future Crusade with the intention of liberating the Balkans, Anatolia and creating three Christian states in the Middle East. Efforts should be made to facilitate the de-construction of the Protestant Church whose members should convert back to Catholicism. The Protestant Church had an important role once but its original goals have been accomplished and have contributed to reform the Catholic Church as well. Europe should have a united Church lead by a just and non-suicidal Pope who is willing to fight for the security of his subjects, especially in regards to Islamic atrocities.
I fully support that the Church gains more or less monopoly on religion in Europe (government policies, school curriculum etc at least) in addition to granting the Church several concessions which have been taken from them the last decades.As for the Church and science, it is essential that science takes an undisputed precedence over biblical teachings. Europe has always been the cradle of science and it must always continue to be that way.
Regarding my personal relationship with God, I guess I’m not an excessively religious man. I am first and foremost a man of logic. However, I am a supporter of a monocultural Christian Europe.”

Anders
Breivik admitted toward the end of his manifesto that he IS NOT a
Christian. He admitted that he does NOT have a “personal relationship
with Jesus” but was using Christianity as a TOOL to try to create a
“cultural, social, identity and moral platform.”  He wanted the benefits of a so-called Christian environment without committing his life to Christ or to Christ’s principles.  So WHY is the dominant liberal media, who should have done their homework by now, so determined to label a mass murderer a Christian when he clearly stated he isn’t??    
(See the third paragraph under Religion in this article:
http://www.thenewamerican.com/world-mainmenu-26/europe-mainmenu-35/8358-despite-claims-norway-terrorist-hardly-christian

bullshit.

using a freaking blow torch the first time can give you stress. that’s why elite paramilitary types are constantly training.  to get used to it.  the more you kill, the easier it gets.

this guy first blew up a truck bomb in the capital city of his own nation.  then he waltzed around to the shore and grabbed a ferry — complete with guns on display — and then went on to yes, kill young people for 90 mins straight.

what kind of freaking –machine– is capable of that sort of performance?  drugs he took?  uppers based on his own recipes in the manifesto (which clearly is coded and is now communicated to who knows who).

all very fishy.

bullshit.

using a freaking blow torch the first time can give you stress. that’s why elite paramilitary types are constantly training.  to get used to it.  the more you kill, the easier it gets.

this guy first blew up a truck bomb in the capital city of his own nation.  then he waltzed around to the shore and grabbed a ferry — complete with guns on display — and then went on to yes, kill young people for 90 mins straight.

what kind of freaking –machine– is capable of that sort of performance?  drugs he took?  uppers based on his own recipes in the manifesto (which clearly is coded and is now communicated to who knows who).

all very fishy.

I sincerely hope all of you kill yourselves. God isnt real, and if he was he would hate you all. THIS IS NOT EUROPEAN IDEALS. European ideals are liberalism, freedom, and YES, MULTICULTURALISM. Anders is a disgrace to Europe.

wrong – Breivik acknowledges his Christian cultural roots, but he explicitly declares his hatred for the Christian religion. He also expresses an obsessive pagan belief in Mother Earth

For all right wing brothers : Anders had better turn his attacks on muslim mosks and moslim gatherings instead the norwegians…..

maybe the next crusader………….

No training at all, just mad and shooting unarmed people,  making a bomb can be found here on the internet.

Conservative revolution! Breivik, a european hero!