Is the Hurricane Threat Being Exagerated? If So, Why?
Tweet
By Toro520
People appear to be riveted to their televisions as the “looming threat” of Hurricane Irene approaches New York City. Early estimates insisted that it would increase in speed and ferocity, approaching wind speeds upward of 130 miles per hour; claims that entire blocks throughout the boroughs could be flooded out, including the West Village, Battery Park, The World Trade Center Site, The Holland Tunnel, Jamaica, Sheep’s Head Bay, and areas near JFK Airport, including Coney island and Rockaway. News stations have established constant feeds to update viewers, which even run during commercials.
Chris Christie, governor of New Jersey, has gone so far as to proclaim that it will be deemed “criminal” to not abide by evacuation instructions.
Warehouse stores are being stripped of supplies; Home Depot, Walmart, and others are reporting empty shelves…and spiking stock values.
However, I ask you to take time to reflect on the footage you may have seen on any news channel…perhaps take a moment to surf through the coverage.
Now, tell me: how many reporters are you seen covering the storm live from its epicenter?
The estimates of this storm’s rage seem to be falling rather short. The storm is rapidly losing energy. Weather models now show the wind speeds dropping to 70-80 miles per hour by Saturday night, and as low as 50 miles per hour by Sunday morning. However, what is even more telling is what has actually been recorded, but isn’t being said.
Upon hitting land, Weather Underground Stations throughout the Carolinas haven’t reported any gusts higher than 33 miles per hour, which can hardly be classified as even a tropical storm. A resident who rode the storm out called in to Fox New to report that most damage inflicted was broken and uprooted trees.
As can be seen below, some residents found it to be perfect surfing weather:
But you can’t see any of this reported on the mainstream media.
Federal emergency workers are scurrying about like ants with a purpose, gobbling up resources, touting their importance, and spreading worry…and reliance on government intervention…like a virus.
I fully agree that it is better to be safe, rather than sorry, but not if it is the result of fear-mongering and dishonesty; many people are still on edge from the minor earthquake earlier in the week…yet another “natural disaster” that seemed to achieve much undeserving attention.
Why is there such an apparent discrepancy in reporting and what is actually occurring?
Is it genuine anxiety?
Do east-coast urbanites just have a nasty habit of over-exaggerating threats to their cities as much as they seem to exaggerate their supposed ‘toughness’ and pretentious significance?
Or is there a more dubious motive?
“Never let a good crisis go to waste.”

