Home  »  Afghanistan  »  New Army Medics To Receive Enhanced Training

New Army Medics To Receive Enhanced Training



Sep 7, 2011 5 Comments ›› Angelia

medics.jpg

Military Times:

The Army will be training hundreds of new medics in enhanced skills to treat wounded service members during the flight from the battlefield to field hospital, when the most severely injured have a better chance of surviving with an experienced paramedic aboard.

The tentative plan is to train 1,200 critical-care flight paramedics at a cost of $53 million, with the first of them deployed next year, said Col. Bob Mitchell, aviation consultant to the Army surgeon general.

“[This] is a quantum leap forward for how we’ve done business so far,” said Lt. Col. Bob Mabry, an emergency medicine and pre-hospital care specialist, and an architect of the plan.

The need for the new specialists became clear when the vast distances for airlifting casualties in Afghanistan complicated care for troops suffering multiple amputations, severe blood loss, brain damage and internal injuries, Mabry says. Massive bleeding and organ failure make it difficult for surgeons to save these casualties.

A new Army study shows that severely injured troops and Afghan civilians transported by Army National Guard units whose medics were also civilian flight paramedics had a 66 percent higher survival rate than casualties carried by standard Army medevac units. Civilian flight paramedics are the highly trained medical professionals found on emergency air helicopters.

In Afghanistan, medical flights are usually staffed by medics with basic live-saving training only.

The Army has placed critical-care nurses on flights between medical facilities, but not on flights from the battlefield.

Mitchell said a dozen of these nurses are now in Afghanistan.

The current survival rate for wounded troops, at more than 95 percent, has never been better, military data show.

However, most of the remaining 5 percent die before reaching surgeons.

“We want to enhance the skills of our medics at the critical time between the point of injury and getting them back to the hospital,” said Brig. Gen. Richard Thomas, an assistant surgeon general. “Our [survival] numbers are good. But that’s a vulnerable period in there.”

Training for medics would increase from four weeks to six to eight months, Mitchell says. Trainees would learn ways of delivering oxygen to patients in cases of severe brain injury, injecting drugs that temporarily paralyze and sedate so a breathing tube can be inserted and a ventilator used during flight.

Monitoring ventilation pressure during altitude changes would also be crucial, said Mabry, who served as a special operations medic during the “Black Hawk Down” battle in Somalia in 1993, before becoming a doctor.

The new paramedics would also be skilled at providing transfusions and drugs to stem blood loss, he says.

Without the new skills used on severe casualties fresh from battle, massive blood loss and the shock and organ failure that follow create problems surgeons can’t fix, Mabry says.

“You get to a point where [damage] is irreversible,” he says. “We can’t get you back.”


  • Anonymous

    I will never forget a Marine talking about training for war and having to carry stretchers as part of the drills.  He said in training they didn’t teach them how to carry a stretcher w/blood on the handles.  His story got to me.

  • Idcusn_70

    That would be the fault of his Battalion Surgeon if he were in an Infantry Battalion.  If it were a support unit, then the OIC would be the issue.  As the BN Surg for my unit, we trained extensively with a Murphy’s Law mindset.  I think we might be a bit better on the Navy-Marine Corps sidee but as with everything, the success is unit dependent and the leadership involved.  I would say that the type of trainin used not just for the Corpsmen but also for our Marine Combat LifeSavers serves as a significant force multiplier.  I cannot go into the details of our training regimine as there are some propagandist out their that would love to protest the issue.  I just recently returned from Helmand Province.  Out of our KIAs 50% died at moment of injury (the percentage that are killed in the initial moments which medically can not be addressed.  The other 50% were treated, stabalized, and made it to a Role III facility but died on the OR table due to severity of injuries.  The number one goal I pounded into my men was that our job was to give every Marine a chance on the OR table.  We did accomplish that (excluding the outright deaths at point of injury). 

  • Idcusn_70

    That would be the fault of his Battalion Surgeon if he were in an Infantry Battalion.  If it were a support unit, then the OIC would be the issue.  As the BN Surg for my unit, we trained extensively with a Murphy’s Law mindset.  I think we might be a bit better on the Navy-Marine Corps sidee but as with everything, the success is unit dependent and the leadership involved.  I would say that the type of trainin used not just for the Corpsmen but also for our Marine Combat LifeSavers serves as a significant force multiplier.  I cannot go into the details of our training regimine as there are some propagandist out their that would love to protest the issue.  I just recently returned from Helmand Province.  Out of our KIAs 50% died at moment of injury (the percentage that are killed in the initial moments which medically can not be addressed.  The other 50% were treated, stabalized, and made it to a Role III facility but died on the OR table due to severity of injuries.  The number one goal I pounded into my men was that our job was to give every Marine a chance on the OR table.  We did accomplish that (excluding the outright deaths at point of injury). 

  • http://twitter.com/Paranemec Devin M Nemec

    Army medic training is 4 months long, not 4 weeks long.

  • http://twitter.com/Paranemec Devin M Nemec

    Army medic training is 4 months long, not 4 weeks long.