Home  »  Military  »  Dems Pushing Military To Allow Women Into Combat

Dems Pushing Military To Allow Women Into Combat



Nov 18, 2011 10 Comments ›› Angelia

(Washington Times) — Top defense officials are grappling to find a unified position on whether to allow women in direct ground combat, as the Pentagon prepares a landmark report to Congress on the military’s coed future.

In the wake of two wars in which women have exchanged fire with the enemy, the Pentagon is being pressed to scrap the ban on women serving below the brigade level in units whose main mission is direct ground combat. That means women may not be infantry members or Green Berets.

“It is the subject of ongoing discussions but not yet fully resolved,” a senior Pentagon official said when asked whether ArmyGen. Martin E. Dempsey, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, has a recommendation for Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta.

The chiefs and Mr. Panetta are being pressed to present their views now because Congress passed a bill ordering the services to conduct a review and submit it this year.

Asked for Mr. Panetta’s position, a second defense official said: “I think the secretary is still weighing the ultimate recommendations that are being worked, and the report is not complete. So I’m not sure I can add to that at this point.”

Because the exclusion is a policy, not a law, Mr. Panetta could lift the restrictions on all or some jobs after notifying Congress.

The push to put women in ground combat units has come mostly from liberals in Congress and outside groups. They argue that women have proved their mettle in Iraq and Afghanistan by serving in police units and security details that exchanged fire with the enemy in wars that had no front lines.


  • The Shadow

    The USSR had women soldiers during WW2. They were beasts. Total beasts. Another example of the merging of the US military into a Bolshevik force.

    The German Heer was of course blamed for “killing innocent women”.  Hardly innocent. Hardly women I say 

    • Lee Howard

      treatment of prisoners by Afghan women and Native American women is legendary.

  • Anonymous

    Wonder how this will change attitudes toward war. There were women in US history who pretended to be men so they could fight. I wonder how many are doing that now.

  • Lee Howard

    Interesting issue.

    In societies where women have no value, they are not considered worthy of being fighters.  In other societies, women are considered too valuable to risk in combat.

  • shutterbug

    Women are not the little angels ala 1950′s Leave it to Beave anymorer.  Let them fight.

  • ATTILA

    Another milestone in the misguided attempt to create an “egalitarian” society.
    One more strike against unit cohesion. Same as forcing the military to accept the pickle puffers.
    The average GI doesn’t want the trenches filled with bull dykes.(or rump rangers for that matter)
    The lefties are intentionally trying to forge weaker links in the chain. Female physiology is weaker in certain areas.
     Panetta is a pussy if he goes for this.
    One more nail in our coffin of national defense.

    • http://patdollard.com USMC3112

      It fits the raaaaaaaaaacit’s,socialist,marxist, new world template, weaken the US military by any means necessary, this is another way toward accomplishing the goal. Naturally, the Pentagon will cave.

    • Just a girl.

      -I wish I had typed this comment. Absolutely dead on.

    • Just a girl.

      -I wish I had typed this comment. Absolutely dead on.

    • Just a girl.

      -I wish I had typed this comment. Absolutely dead on.