Leftists Are Some Racist Bastards at Pat Dollard

Leftists Are Some Racist Bastards

November 5th, 2011 (9) Posted By Pat Dollard.

By Matt Dawson

Are you sick of being called a racist for not supporting Leftist ideology? I for one am sick as hell of it. How in the hell did conservatives get labeled as racist? The party that started the Ku Klux Klan is calling us racists? I don’t think so! Is it that republicans or conservatives have a long history of racists and racism? How bout we go through a list of Liberal racists and their thoughts.

I know you have heard of the Establishment clause, i.e. the separation of Church and State. The one Liberal Hallmark that the Left uses to dismantle any shred of religion in America. It was interpreted as No God anywhere in public by a Leftist peckerhead name Hugo Black. He was the Supreme Court Justice nominated by Socialist Hero Franklin Delano Roosevelt. If you look up Leftist Beatified Saints in the Democrat handbook, Hugo Black would be on the front page. But leftists forget to inform you that Black was in a small social club that you probably never heard of it was called the FREAKING KKK! Yeah! To make up for this decision he later said he regretted joining by saying “actually I would have joined any group that would have gotten me more votes.” What?! Just a few months ago we heard how Rick Perry was a racist for just having a racist rock on a property that his Dad rented. Oh no but a super Liberal Supreme Court Justice can say “Oh yeah I was in the Klan but who really cares I needed the votes.” As a senator Black not only voted against an Anti-lynching bill he actually filibustered it! That means he went out of his way to say, “Lynching is A-OK.” Maybe he got less racist as a Justice. Nope. He defended Roosevelt on his decision to imprison Japanese Americans for simply being Japanese. Leftists today get angry if we suggest that someone might want to look into a citizen that has Hamas ties and just bought a boatload of blasting caps. He’s probably just a hobbyist, right? But the Leftists fail to mention that Roosevelt loved rounding up 1000’s of innocent Japanese Americans and imprisoning them without a trial.

Oh yeah Roosevelt was a racist too. Did you know that during the famous 1936 Olympics in Nazi Germany where Black American Jesse Owens won 4 gold medals that Roosevelt refused to meet with any black athletes and didn’t even bother to send a telegraph saying congratulations. Even Adolph Hitler congratulated Owens. Yeah for one day in 1936 Franklin Roosevelt was more Racist than ADOLPH HITLER! Wrap your mind around that. Jesse Owens later went on to say “Hitler didn’t snub me, FDR did.” It wasn’t until Eisenhower, a Republican, became president that Owens was invited to the White House 19 years later. Could you imagine the outrage if Ole Dubya had done that?

Ok maybe it was just leftists of the past that were racists right? Wrong again. Senator Robert Byrd was Kleagle and Exalted Cyclops in the KKK. If you’re curious that is one the top ranks in the Klan. He won it unanimously in 1944. Robert Byrd was not only a sheet wearing uberracist but he was also third in line to the president until his death in 2010. In 1964 he filibustered the Civil Rights act for over 14 hours. A bill I might add that got 80% of Republican support and only 64% of Democrat support. Byrd is also the only senator to vote against Thurgood Marshall and Clarence Thomas. Remember all the flack Trent Lott got for saying Strom Thurmond was cool?

Maybe it’s because of our ideology that we’re racist. Is it because Conservatives think that people are all created equal and that we would rather judge people by the content of their character and not the color of their skin? Who do I remember saying that? Oh Yeah, Martin Luther King Jr! Leftist tell us that we have no other choice but to judge people by the color of their skin. That some people need to be treated differently than others based on the shade of their epidermis. Yeah that’s not racist at all. So the leftist scream that Conservatives are racists by default because we want a true color blind society, a society that King dreamed of having. So next time a Leftist tells you that you that you’re a racist first tell him he is Fecal infested Roundworm and then tell him that conservatives have the history, the facts, and perspective on our side.

You can follow Matt Dawson on Twitter @SaintRPh

Your Ad Here

Hawkerdriver

The revisionist history teachers, proffessors,and textbook publishers are swiftly erasing all these facts to a whole generation.When my daughter was in high school I remember having to look up and show her some of the less-than-plesant things about the leftist god, FDR. She was surprised,as she told me all they covered in her class was how he “single handedly pulled America from the ruin that was the Great Depression” and “set programs in motion that saved America and got her back to work…one of our greatest prsidents,” etc,etc..GAG! I myself remember hearing some of the same propaganda when I was in grade school back in the early 60′s! I fear that by the next generation,the history books will contain NOTHING of what truly made this country great. Queers,commies,leftist thugs,obama,clinton,phleger,sharpton,reid,franks,pelosi,jones, thier countless legions of like-minded worshipers now occupying the nations capitol, commiting both overt and covert treason, giving aid and comfort to our eneimies, subverting the Constitution and Bill of Rights… will be elevated to greatness..Well,history repeats kids..ALWAYS!. It’s getting plainer by the day to see that nothing short of another War of Northern Aggression will change anything. (it’s called the “Civil” War in your history books)..If you look up from your cellphones long enough one day,you might just find yourself in the middle of a combat zone.God help us,the evil runs so deep..
Tom in CO

Just don’t look at the comments at Breitbart. Some pretty racists trolls there too.

Anonymous

Red State is also a great place to join in some racist speech. NOTHING LIKE DIVIDING AMERICA!!!
Anonymous

Red State is also a great place to join in some racist speech. NOTHING LIKE DIVIDING AMERICA!!!
Anonymous

Red State is also a great place to join in some racist speech. NOTHING LIKE DIVIDING AMERICA!!!

Sixchuter

The charge of racism, like the charge of hate, is meant to accomplish two things: shame the opposition into silence, and make the accuser feel morally superior to the accused. If you’re accused of racism, state what I just wrote, then ask the accuser if he thinks he’s morally superior to you. Go on the attack. Don’t waste your time with historical facts, because leftists don’t care about facts. Attack the premise – the premise being that you are morally inferior to the accuser.

Anonymous

Yeah, because I’ve been on this site for a total of 15 mins, and i’ve seen the use of FAG, SLUT, Leftist, Communists, PaulTards, Commies, Pink, and much much more hate speech. IF YOU DONT WANT TO BE TYPECAST AS A BUNCH OF IDIOTS, INFORM YOURSELF AND STOP ACTING LIKE ONE.

You people are so moronic, my kitten is more informed then you. TURN OFF THE FUCKING TV AND RADIO!
Anonymous

Yeah, because I’ve been on this site for a total of 15 mins, and i’ve seen the use of FAG, SLUT, Leftist, Communists, PaulTards, Commies, Pink, and much much more hate speech. IF YOU DONT WANT TO BE TYPECAST AS A BUNCH OF IDIOTS, INFORM YOURSELF AND STOP ACTING LIKE ONE.

You people are so moronic, my kitten is more informed then you. TURN OFF THE FUCKING TV AND RADIO!

dougindeap

Separation of church and state is a bedrock principle of our
Constitution much like the principles of separation of powers and checks and
balances. In the Constitution, the founders did not simply say in so many words
that there should be separation of powers and checks and balances; rather, they
actually separated the powers of government among three branches and
established checks and balances. Similarly, they did not merely say there
should be separation of church and state; rather, they actually separated them
by (1) establishing a secular government on the power of the people (not a
deity), (2) saying nothing to connect that government to god(s) or religion,
(3) saying nothing to give that government power over matters of god(s) or
religion, and (4), indeed, saying nothing substantive about god(s) or religion
at all except in a provision precluding any religious test for public office. Given the norms of the day, the founders’
avoidance of any expression in the Constitution suggesting that the government
is somehow based on any religious belief was quite a remarkable and plainly
intentional choice. They later
buttressed this separation with the First Amendment, which constrains the
government from undertaking to establish religion or prohibit individuals from
freely exercising their religions. The basic principle, thus, rests on much
more than just the First Amendment.

Some try to pass off the Supreme Court’s decision in Everson v. Board of
Education as simply a misreading of Jefferson’s letter to the Danbury
Baptists–as if that were the only basis of the Court’s decision. Instructive as
that letter is, it played but a small part in the Court’s decision. Perhaps even
more than Jefferson, James Madison influenced the Court’s view. Madison, who
had a central role in drafting the Constitution and the First Amendment,
confirmed that he understood them to “[s]trongly guard[] . . . the separation
between Religion and Government.” Madison, Detached Memoranda (~1820). He made
plain, too, that they guarded against more than just laws creating state
sponsored churches or imposing a state religion. Mindful that even as new
principles are proclaimed, old habits die hard and citizens and politicians
could tend to entangle government and religion (e.g., “the appointment of
chaplains to the two houses of Congress” and “for the army and navy” and
“[r]eligious proclamations by the Executive recommending thanksgivings and
fasts”), he considered the question whether these actions were “consistent with
the Constitution, and with the pure principle of religious freedom” and
responded: “In strictness the answer on both points must be in the negative.
The Constitution of the United States forbids everything like an establishment
of a national religion.” During his
presidency, Madison also vetoed two bills, neither of which would form a
national religion or compel observance of any religion, on the ground that they
were contrary to the establishment clause. While some in Congress expressed
surprise that the Constitution prohibited Congress from incorporating a church
in the town of Alexandria in the District of Columbia or granting land to a
church in the Mississippi Territory, Congress upheld both vetoes. Separation of
church and state is not a recent invention of the courts.

The KKK-anti-Catholic smear against Justice Black is sometimes offered as an
explanation for his opinion in Everson v. Board of Education–even though
nothing in his opinions remotely supports that claim, all nine justices agreed
on the principle that the First Amendment called for separation of church and
state (so it was hardly just Black’s doing), and Black led the majority of five
in holding that the principle did NOT preclude state funding of transportation
of students to parochial schools.

The Constitution, including particularly the First Amendment, embodies the
simple, just idea that each of us should be free to exercise his or her
religious views without expecting that the government will endorse or promote
those views and without fearing that the government will endorse or promote the
religious views of others. Efforts to undercut our secular government by
somehow merging or infusing it with religion should be resisted by every
patriot.