Congress Overturns Incandescent Bulb Ban

December 16th, 2011 (3) Posted By Toro520.

Washington Times:

Congressional negotiators struck a deal Thursday that overturns the new rules that were to have banned sales of traditional incandescent light bulbs beginning next year.

That agreement is tucked inside the massive 1,200-page spending bill that funds the government through the rest of this fiscal year, and which both houses of Congress will vote on Friday. Mr. Obama is expected to sign the bill, which heads off a looming government shutdown.

Congressional Republicans dropped almost all of the policy restrictions they tried to attach to the bill, but won inclusion of the light bulb provision, which prevents the Obama administration from carrying through a 2007 law that would have set energy efficiency standards that effectively made the traditional light bulb obsolete.

Stopping the bulb ban was a chief GOP priority coming into this year, with all of the candidates seeking to become chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee saying they would push through a repeal. That bill cleared the House but Democrats blocked its consideration in the Senate.

The spending bill doesn’t actually amend the 2007 law, but does prohibit the administration from spending any money to carry out the light bulb standards — which amounts to at least a temporary reprieve.

The spending bill is full of similar provisions that are included year after year to restrict what administrations can do.

At $915 billion in discretionary spending, the bill amounts to $750.6 million per page, and funds the vast majority of government operations, from defense to homeland security to federal parks. Since it is a must-pass bill, it also becomes a major battleground for policy fights such as the light bulbs.

Among the other policy riders attached to the bill is a requirement that all new federal employees be run through E-Verify, the voluntary government system for checking to see if employees are authorized to work in the U.S.; restrictions on the administration transferring suspected terrorist detainees from Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, to the U.S.; and a ban on the District of Columbia using government money to pay for abortions.

The GOP tried but failed to attach restrictions on the Obama administration’s nuclear waste policy, its international family planning policy and major restrictions on the president’s environmental agenda. Mr. Obama and Democrats also forced Republicans to remove provisions that would have prevented him from requiring government contractors to disclose their political contributions — though they cannot be required to disclose them as part of an application for a loan or grant.

“These contentious policy riders had no place in our annual appropriations bills, and it was encouraging that we were able to remove nearly all of them from the final version of this bill,” said Rep. Norm Dicks, the ranking Democrat on the House Appropriations Committee.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_54WFAGW7SOZAYYLI5RLEWHYA5U Jafro

    Ahem…  YAAAAAAAAAY!

    My ancestor, the inventor of that light bulb, thanks you kindly.  He wouldn’t have wanted you polluting your home with mercury when the fluorescent bulbs break.  This was never an environmental energy-saving deal.  It was always a political payoff.  It was about sending even more money than we were making off incandescents to a China-only manufacturing base for a dubious-at-best product.  A product that would have failed if not for a government subsidy or regulation.  

    A smarter grid than we have would saved more electricity than those toxic light bulbs do.  Bring on the warm glow!  Now if we can just start making them in the USA again.

    • wwtd

      Fluorescent was on the hit list too. We were going to light things up with a thirty dollar LED light and a frickin candle. 

  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_54WFAGW7SOZAYYLI5RLEWHYA5U Jafro

    Ahem…  YAAAAAAAAAY!

    My ancestor, the inventor of that light bulb, thanks you kindly.  He wouldn’t have wanted you polluting your home with mercury when the fluorescent bulbs break.  This was never an environmental energy-saving deal.  It was always a political payoff.  It was about sending even more money than we were making off incandescents to a China-only manufacturing base for a dubious-at-best product.  A product that would have failed if not for a government subsidy or regulation.  

    A smarter grid than we have would saved more electricity than those toxic light bulbs do.  Bring on the warm glow!  Now if we can just start making them in the USA again.