… and Saddam didn’t kill any … we just made it up … – R. Paul
Just a Girl
Ugh….this man !!!! Could he be anymore the absolute epitome of a disgusting apologist for this bullshit, fucked up, backwards, stone age, let’s wipe our ass with our hands, child raping, women beating, stagnant, cave dwelling, goat fucking, nonsensical cult ?
GRIZZ
Maybe we should have killed a million more
The Shadow
Theoretically Paul’s position on Foreign and Domestic Policy is the old Republican position that was standard from the 1920′s all the way up to the late 1970′s.
The fact is the guy is to old to be President. He would make a great Treasury Secretary. That is his Peter Principle level.
Anonymous
Hooyah, Girl! Now, tell us what you really think of Islam.
J. Delta
It was past Mr. Magoo’s bedtime and he got confused. Again.
J. Delta
It was past Mr. Magoo’s bedtime and he got confused. Again.
AL
and wrong paul…
AL
and wrong paul…
http://patdollard.com USMC3112
WTH? And people will actually vote for this nut? oh well, if the white guilt crowd can vote a raaaaaaaaaaaacist,socialist/marxist/murderer in the White House? When in rome right? I’m looking at you, ron paul supporters..
http://patdollard.com USMC3112
WTH? And people will actually vote for this nut? oh well, if the white guilt crowd can vote a raaaaaaaaaaaacist,socialist/marxist/murderer in the White House? When in rome right? I’m looking at you, ron paul supporters..
Just a Girl
LOL..I held back a teeny tiny bit.
Anonymous
Ooooweee! My kinda woman!
Anonymous
Ooooweee! My kinda woman!
Anonymous
Ooooweee! My kinda woman!
mike3481
Ron Paul is showing everyone why he has never been allowed anywhere near a Congressional Intelligence Committee, his foreign policy is akin to a 13 year old girl screaming because she saw a spider.
Charlie from New Jersey
To claim that the existence of nuclear weapons is a guarantee of war is demonstrably wrong. The Korean war would have certainly flared up into World War III if not for nuclear weapons. Only nuclear weapons in the hands of nutjob Islamists are dangerous because they think that they go to heaven for blowing up their neighbors. In fact, you will notice that the Islamic Mullahs always send OTHER people to be martyrs. If we had any other Republican except Ron Paul as President, Iran would not attack Isreal (who does not have 300 nuclear warheads. Jeez, where does he get this shit? There is not enough nuclear material missing in the world for them to have more than a handful, even if you assume the Israelis had it all.) So, if we made it clear that a single nuclear war head blowing up anywhere in the middle east would be the same as a nuclear strike on America. Then, Iran becomes Glassistan and we steal the oil from under the radioactive once molten crust that used to be Persia.
But, Michelle’s look while she is listening to Raving Ron is priceless!
Charlie from New Jersey
To claim that the existence of nuclear weapons is a guarantee of war is demonstrably wrong. The Korean war would have certainly flared up into World War III if not for nuclear weapons. Only nuclear weapons in the hands of nutjob Islamists are dangerous because they think that they go to heaven for blowing up their neighbors. In fact, you will notice that the Islamic Mullahs always send OTHER people to be martyrs. If we had any other Republican except Ron Paul as President, Iran would not attack Isreal (who does not have 300 nuclear warheads. Jeez, where does he get this shit? There is not enough nuclear material missing in the world for them to have more than a handful, even if you assume the Israelis had it all.) So, if we made it clear that a single nuclear war head blowing up anywhere in the middle east would be the same as a nuclear strike on America. Then, Iran becomes Glassistan and we steal the oil from under the radioactive once molten crust that used to be Persia.
But, Michelle’s look while she is listening to Raving Ron is priceless!
Anonymous
Thought so.
Anonymous
Thought so.
Anonymous
Thought so.
Lou
That guy’s scarey.. lol..it’s no wonder why his own son Rand turned and ran180 degrees into being a true Conservative…
Icorps1970
Were you paying attention in the 1970s?
Just curious.
Or the 1960s?
I don’t remember people like Barry Goldwater spewing this kind of idiotic drivel concerning national defense.
I do remember Nixon invading Cambodia to disrupt the NVA supply bases there. I remember him bombing the hell out of North VN.
I can’t see Ron Paul doing either.
Icorps1970
Why would I care if we killed a million in Iraq?
The military was sent in there to get rid of an Islamic Nazi regime that had helped plan 9/11 and it did.
Had they killed everyone down the level of Donkeys I really would not care. IMO they should have used Iraq as a base to destroy both Syria, Iran and all the Royal Palaces in Saudi Arabia while fully occupied. This would do wonders for the war on terror Which was declared BTW. Congress told Bush to “sicum” after all so he and Obama have authority to do what it takes to destroy Islamic terrorists virtually anyplace they find them. The Constitution, which Paul likes to talk about specifies no language for declaring war.