Russia Sending Naval Battle Group to Syria to “Discourage Armed Conflict”

December 1st, 2011 (17) Posted By Toro520.

…and by “discourage armed conflict,” they obviously mean, “prevent the overthrow of Assad”

Russia Today:

Moscow is deploying warships at its base in the Syrian port of Tartus. The long-planned mission comes, providentially, at the very moment when it could help prevent a potential conflict in the strategically important Middle Eastern country.

­The Russian battle group will consist of three vessels led by the heavy aircraft-carrying missile cruiser, Admiral Kuznetsov.
Russian military officials insist that the move has no connection with the ongoing crisis in the region and was planned a year ago, the Izvestia newspaper reports. Apart from Syria, the aircraft carrier and its escort ships are set to visit the Lebanese capital, Beirut, Genoa in Italy and Cyprus, says the former Chief of Naval Staff, Admiral Viktor Kravchenko.

Nevertheless, he added that the presence of a military force other than NATO’s is very useful for this region, because “it will prevent the outbreak of an armed conflict,” Izvestia quoted Kravchenko as saying.
The Soviet Union, the Admiral recalled, created a special naval squadron to deter Western military forces in the Mediterranean Sea. To repair and supply its ships, Moscow needed its own maintenance base in the region, and that was how the base in Tartus came into being.

At present, the base is mostly used to support vessels of Russia’s Black Sea fleet. Some 600 military and civilian personnel of the Defense Ministry serve there.

News of Russia’s naval deployment in Tartus came shortly after the US nuclear-powered aircraft carrier USS George HW Bush anchored off Syria, along with additional naval vessels. The US battle group is to remain in the Mediterranean, allegedly to conduct maritime security operations and support missions as part of Operations Enduring Freedom and New Dawn. The US 6th Fleet is also patrolling the area, Interfax reports.

“Of course, the Russian naval forces in the Mediterranean will be incommensurate with those of the US 6th Fleet, which includes one or two aircraft carriers and several escort ships,” Admiral Kravchenko explained. “But today, no one talks about possible military clashes, since an attack on any Russian ship would be regarded as a declaration of war with all the consequences.”
The mission is set to start in early December, when the Admiral Kuznetsov begins its journey in the Barents Sea, accompanied by another vessel of Russia’s Northern Fleet, the heavy ASW ship Admiral Chabanenko. The group will then skirt the European continent from the west and enter the Mediterranean through the Strait of Gibraltar.

Later, they will be joined by frigate Ladny of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet. It will travel through the Bosphorus, with a stop-over in Malta’s Valletta.

Admiral Kuznetsov will be carrying eight Sukhoi Su-33 all-weather fighters, two Kamov Ka-27 anti-submarine helicopters and several brand new Mig-29K fighters. The Mig fighters were built for India’s air force and are supposed to be “tested” during their first assignment.

Military officials have stressed that all flights will be performed in open waters, away from the Syrian coast.
Unlike American aircraft carriers, designed largely as floating runways, Admiral Kuznetsov is a heavily-armed aircraft-carrying cruiser. Its primary armaments, among others, are 12 long-range surface-to-surface anti-ship Granit cruise missiles, a six-gun short-range surface-to-air missile system Kinzhal, eight close-in air defense Kashtan gun-missile systems and two UDAV-1 anti-submarine systems.

The Admiral Kuznetsov has already been twice to the port of Tartus during its assignments in the Mediterranean and Atlantic Ocean in 1995 and 2007.

Jihadi Killer Radio Hour
Follow Pat on Twitter
  • The Shadow

    Moscow and Russia has business interests in Syria. The buck stops here. Libya was the last straw for Russia and China.

  • Billy

    ooo, we’re scared! The big, bad, Russian fleet is at sea. What a joke. They’ve got some pretty mean anti-surface missles, but their planes are nothing to worry about. In a real shooting war, they would become reef skeletons in no time.

  • Billy

    ooo, we’re scared! The big, bad, Russian fleet is at sea. What a joke. They’ve got some pretty mean anti-surface missles, but their planes are nothing to worry about. In a real shooting war, they would become reef skeletons in no time.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • Giorgi

      yea, but r u sggesting shooting at russian navy ships?they could just screen any possible NATO action, and without firign a shot.

    • The Shadow

      That is not what happened in Georgia back in 2007. The Russians are very very good fighters. You sure the mixed multitude US military would stand as tough as you claim? 

      Standing shoulder to shoulder with city dwelling US hispanics blacks and mixed race soldiers against White Russian Nationalists is not something I would ever participate in.

  • YERMOM

    as an old bubble head… it’s just another target.

  • http://patdollard.com USMC3112

    The more things change, the more they remain the same. Those fuckers like to test nuts. Look at us, we have a bigger d-ck than you, what are you going to do about it? Even though the GHWB dropped anchor first off the coast of syria, these fucking pukes are saying here we are! This is a classic case of playing reaction to what our fleet is doing. We can’t take them for granted, they are a dangerous fleet. Rule number 1 in warfare, never underestimate your enemy. I would look for these fuckers aircraft to buzz our fleet. They love to do that. History has shown. They know we are not going to do shit about it. Their view, look a panty waist skinny in the White House..

  • Anonymous

    USS George Bush “anchored off Syria” was reported on 11/23 until now, but rather clearly not the case from 11/25, when she docked in Marseilles, France. 
    http://www.thoughts.com/Bluesma/on-the-uss-george-hw-bushhttp://www.laprovence.com/article/a-la-%C2%ADune/marseille-le-port-accueill%C2%ADe-le-dernier-ne-des-porte-avio%C2%ADns-americainsLikely USS Bush headed back to Norfolk at this time.
    http://www.facebook.com/USSGeorgeHWBush
    http://www.2ndrevolt.com/articles/article_view/Chinese-Professor-Threatens-Third-World-War-To-Protect-Iran

    Reports that the Admiral Kuznetsov is due in Syria by mid-week not credible and reports of Russian warship already in Syria likely false propaganda by Syria:
    http://www.debka.com/article/21521/
    Reports that the Kuznetsov due to arrive in Syria by end of Dec., but not particularly credible
    http://rt.com/news/russian-fleet-syrian-port-513/
    More likely to arrive as scheduled in Spring 2012, by which time may be too late as Assad may well be out of office by then. 
    http://www.rianovosti.com/world/20111129/169147335.html

    Or recent reports that Russians dropped plans for the Kuznetsov to visit Syria:
    http://navaltoday.com/2011/12/01/russian-navys-carrier-group-wont-visit-syria/

  • Anonymous

    uh, like  for the Balkans war, Russians occupied the territory  too !

  • Anonymous

    uh, like  for the Balkans war, Russians occupied the territory  too !