Mitt Romney / Not Eligable to hold the office of {POTUS}.
Call upon Mitt Romney now to either post Gaskell Romney’s US naturaliztion documents (or repatriated record) or George Romney‘s US naturaliztion documents that he would have filled out and signed when he was 21 years of age, or withdraw from the presidential race as Constitutionally unqualified to take the oath of office of the presidency of the United States.
Was George Romney (father of Mitt Romney) a U.S. citizen?
Not according to the historical records.
George Romney was born in Mexico to expatriated Mormon parents. George’s father is named Gaskell Romney.If George Romney was not a “U.S. citizen” or became naturalized BEFORE Mitt was born, then neither can Mitt Romeny (his son) be natural born.
The big question is this…how did George and Gaskell Romney get their US Citizenship back if they ever had it at all? If Gaskell (son) and Miles Park Romney (father) who were both Mexican citizens how could they transfer US Citizenship to George Romney? Mitt Romney, however, may be a birthright baby because he fell under the 14th Amendment (I doubt they were under the jurisdiction of the US) but it is absolutely clear that Mitt Romney is NOT a Natural Born Citizen unless he can prove that George Romney gained citizenship from naturalization prior to Mitt’s birth in 1947. I have found no records showing this to be the case.Prove me Wrong Shithead!
anony
Actually the citizenship laws regarding those who had at least one US parent born who were born in Mexico changed AFTER Romney was born therefore he is eligible.
What amazes me most is even those I consider intelligent can read the quotes from Congress and SCOTUS rulings etc. and still will argue with what those words mean.
Folks it honestly is not ROCKET SCIENCE.
It is simply fact … read the quotes for yourself.
Just because no one in politics or the media is dealing with any of this?
None of that ALTERS THE FACTS OR CHANGES what our founders defined this term to mean.
HERE THEY ARE AGAIN United States v. Wong Kim Ark, 169 U.S. 649 (1898):
“At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children, born in a country of PARENTS who were its citizens, became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also.
These were natives, or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners.”
This is straight forward FACT.
To be a NATURAL BORN CITIZEN … you must be born in the country and your parents must BOTH BE CITIZENS.
BOTH REQUIREMENTS MUST BE MET!
PARENTS can be born citizens or naturalized
(naturalized at the time of the child’s birth).
If both requirements are not met the child can still be a “US citizen” just not “natural born”.
No matter how anyone slices, dices or ginsus it Barack Obama has painted himself in a corner with his released Birth Certificate (be it real or fraud).
His father NEVER WAS A US CITIZEN.
For sure he does not meet the “natural born” requirement.
His US citizenship is iffy should his Hawaiian BC turn out to be a fraud.
Now to further hammer nails into the coffin lid of the Constitution comes Mitt Romney.
Here is further information just sent my way on his parentage and their citizenship.
Let me say this again … my research SHOWS NO REPATRIATION OR NATURALIZATION of George Romney.
That does not mean there is none … it does however cast serious problems into the cogs of what appears to be a well oiled Mitt Romney campaign for President machine.
I thank Edward Noonan for allowing me to republish this information.
MITT ROMNEY IS NOT A NATURAL BORN CITIZEN!
BobPinwi
I can agree with what you are saying but that website also promotes a bunch of conspiracy. Cemtrails? That’s as nutty as 911 was an inside job.
I think that research unreasonably reaches back too far in regard to Mitt Romney’s eligibility for POTUS. I do. It looks beyond him and his parents, to his grandparents.
This agenda to disqualify him sounds more ridiculous than the people trying to complete investigation on Barack Hussein Obama (if that was possibly even remotely ridiculous. I don’t think it is). Obama’s birthplace is still disputable. He’s a mystery.
Mitt Romney’s father and mother were United States citizens and resided in the U.S. when Mitt Romney was born. That makes Mitt completely eligible to run for the presidency. Unless, maybe, you have some personal angst against Mormons. Do you? I’m a Mormon.
Phil Byler
The issue should be whether Romney is the best candidate to lead the GOP against. I don’t think so because I don’t think that Romney is a conservative. He wasn’t when he voted for liberal Democrats Jimmy Carter, Walter Mondale and Paul Tsongas. He wasn’t when he was Massachusetts Governor and raised corporate taxes, was adamantly pro-abortion rights, appointed liberal pro-abortion Democrats to the state judiciary and championed RomneyCare, socialized medicine at the state level that is the precursor to ObamaCare. I also question his experience and knowledge concerning foreign policy, military matters and national security. On those subjects, Romney can read a speech written by someone else, but at 3:00 AM, it is the POTUS on his own who has to make the call.
wwtd
Good debate forum. Thought the only one that stood out was Paul as nutty. Most live in a different world than he does. He says a few things that appeal to libertarians, or conservatives on economic issues, but completely irresponsible on foreign policy. Probably better equiped to debate Jefferson Davis, although his beliefs are similar.
Phil Byler
No, I thought Newt stood out, coming across as the serious, knowedgeable and experienced adult in the room.