Home  »  US News  »  PETA Euthanizes More Than 95% Of The Animals In Its Care

PETA Euthanizes More Than 95% Of The Animals In Its Care



Feb 25, 2012 11 Comments ›› Toro520

The Daily Caller:

Documents published online this month show that People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, an organization known for its uncompromising animal-rights positions, killed more than 95 percent of the pets in its care in 2011.

The documents, obtained from the Virginia Department of Agriculture and Consumer Services, were published online by the Center for Consumer Freedom, a non-profit organization that runs online campaigns targeting groups that antagonize food producers.

Fifteen years’ worth of similar records show that since 1998 PETA has killed more than 27,000 animals at its headquarters in Norfolk, VA.

In a February 16 statement, the Center said PETA killed 1,911 cats and dogs last year, finding homes for only 24 pets.

“PETA hasn’t slowed down its slaughterhouse operation,” said Rick Berman, CCF’s executive director. “It appears PETA is more concerned with funding its media and advertising antics than finding suitable homes for these dogs and cats.”

In a statement, Berman added that PETA has a $37 million dollar annual budget.

His organization runs PETAkillsAnimals.com, which reports that in 2010 a resident of Virginia called PETA and asked if there was an animal shelter at the group’s headquarters. PETA responded that there was not.

The Virginian, the website reports, then called his state’s agriculture department. Dr. Daniel Kovich investigated, and conducted an inspection of PETA’s headquarters.

“The facility does not contain sufficient animal enclosures to routinely house the number of animals annually reported as taken into custody,” Kovich concluded in his report.

Kovich also determined that PETA employees kill 84 percent of the animals in their custody within 24 hours of receiving them.

“[PETA’s] primary purpose,” Kovich wrote, “is not to find permanent adoptive homes for animals.”

PETA media liaison Jane Dollinger told The Daily Caller in an email that “most of the animals we take in are society’s rejects; aggressive, on death’s door, or somehow unadoptable.”

Dollinger did not dispute her organization’s sky-high euthanasia rate, but insisted PETA only kills dogs and cats because of “injury, illness, age, aggression, or because no good homes exist for them.”

PETA’s own history, however, shows that this has not always been the case.

In 2005, two PETA employees described as “adorable” and “perfect” some of the dogs and cats they killed in the back of a PETA-owned van. The two were arrested after police witnessed them tossing the animals’ dead bodies into a North Carolina dumpster.

PETA had no comment when the Daily Caller asked what sort of effort it routinely makes to find adoptive homes for animals in its care.


  • Gator

    By the looks of that woman?? someone shaved their dogs ass and he is walking backward!

  • GRIZZ

    Shut your puppy killn trap and show your tits….BITCH….the rest of you fags can go suck off obama

    • richwill

      Grizz, do you really want to see her tits?  The tits are as ugly as the rest of her.  Euthanize all members of PETA and put them out of their misery.

    • http://twitter.com/RexRedbone Not Tom MannisThanks

      Griz was talking about the one in the green bikinis with post cards over her tits

  • mommyRN

    sounds like peta and planned parenthood have a lot in common.

  • Jim

    Holy fuck batman! A 37million dollar budget and they rescued 24 animals? These sound like obomas jobs that cost 200k to 750k each. I still have not figured out who the dumb asses are that keeps feeding them $$$, other than a few hollywierd types it’s not believable.

  • Terry_Phillips

    Hypocrits

  • Just a Girl

     I am ashamed to admit that in my early days as a college student I did support PETA. – I wasn’t a full blown nutcase, but might very well have been on the verge.

    To this day I am so thankful for a fellow student who saw me sporting my PETA shirt, took my dumb ass aside, and quite frankly schooled my ass on the farce of animal rights, and most importantly, Peter Singer- the so-called “Pioneer” of the animal rights movement.

    So yes, it all makes sense, doesn’t it….save the whales, save the turtles, save the trees, but kill babies, and hate humanity. That is all anyone needs to know about PETA. The hypocrisy is just an added disgrace.

  • Tom in CO

    PETA is the worst.

    • texasoysterman

      I would disagree… PETA is bad, but Animal Liberation Front is the the worst. They are the most extreme, anyway. 
      Humane Society of the United States is really bad, too. People are confused and think they are donating to the American Humane Association which has been around for more than 100 years. HSUS is not affiliated with AHA or any particular state humane society. They are an extremist group. 
      There are a lot of different extremist groups. The question is, when people donate to main-stream, supposedly non-extremist groups, does some of the money go to extremist groups too. I don’t know.
      I only donate to our local Animal Friends, which states that they are not affiliated with any other local or national animal organization.

  • Aprkaren

    I have known two people who worked for PETA and both quit when they found out that they euthanize 95 % os the rescued or pets that have been given up by their owners!!!  Its about time the owrd got out-they do not bel;ieve that humans should have more than one pet. Thus keeping their rescues from getting adopted.
    Karen
     Pet – Pals