Home  »  Middle East  »  State Department Quietly Warning Region That Syria Has Saddam’s WMDs

State Department Quietly Warning Region That Syria Has Saddam’s WMDs



Feb 24, 2012 15 Comments ›› Angelia

The Cable:

The State Department has begun coordinating with Syria’s neighbors to prepare for the handling of President Bashar al-Assad’s extensive weapons of mass destruction if and when his regime collapses, The Cable has learned.

This week, the State Department sent a diplomatic demarche to Syria’s neighbors Iraq, Jordan, Lebanon, and Saudi Arabia, warning them about the possibility of Syria’s WMDs crossing their borders and offering U.S. government help in dealing with the problem, three Obama administration officials confirmed to The Cable. For concerned parties both inside and outside the U.S. government, the demarche signifies that the United States is increasingly developing plans to deal with the dangers of a post-Assad Syria — while simultaneously highlighting the lack of planning for how to directly bring about Assad’s downfall.

Syria is believed to have a substantial chemical weapons program, which includes mustard gas and sophisticated nerve agents, such as sarin gas, as well as biological weapons. Syria has also refused IAEA requests to make available facilities that were part of its nuclear weapons program and may still be in operation.

The State Department declined to provide access to any officials to discuss the private diplomatic communication on the record, such as the author of the demarche Assistant Secretary of State for International Security and Nonproliferation Tom Countryman. In a meeting with reporters earlier this year, Countryman expressed confidence that the United States knows where Syria’s WMD stockpiles are, but warned that they could become a very serious security issue for Syria and the region going forward.

“We have ideas as to the quantity and we have ideas as to where they are,” Countryman said. “We wish some of the neighbors of Syria to be on the lookout… When you get a change of regime in Syria, it matters what are the conditions — chaotic or orderly.”

Today, in response to inquiries from The Cable, a State Department official offered the following statement:

“The U.S. and our allies are monitoring Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile. These weapons’ presence in Syria undermines peace and security in the Middle East, and we have long called on the Syrian government to destroy its chemicals weapons arsenal and join the Chemical Weapons Convention,” the State Department official said. “We believe Syria’s chemical weapons stockpile remains under Syrian government control, and we will continue to work closely with like-minded countries to prevent proliferation of Syria’s chemical weapons program.”

The demarche made four specific points, according to other U.S. officials who offered a fuller account to The Cable. It communicated the U.S. government’s recognition that there is a highly active chemical warfare program in Syria, which is complemented by ballistic-missile delivery capability. It further emphasized that that any potential political transition in Syria could raise serious questions about the regime’s control over proliferation-sensitive material.

Third, the State Department wanted Syria’s neighbors to know that should the Assad regime fall, the security of its WMD stockpile — as well as its control over conventional weapons like MANPADS (shoulder-fired rocket launchers) — could come into question and could pose a serious threat to regional security. Lastly, the demarche emphasized that the U.S. government stands ready to support neighboring countries to provide border-related security cooperation.

“It’s essentially a recognition of the danger to the regional and international community of the stockpiles that the regime possesses and the importance of working with countries, given the potential fall of the regime, to prevent the proliferation of these very sensitive weapons outside of Syria’s border,” one administration official said. “It’s an exponentially more dangerous program than Libya. We are talking about legitimate WMDs here — this isn’t Iraq. The administration is really concerned about loose WMDs. It’s one of the few things you could put on the agenda and do something about without planning the fall of the regime.”

The administration is also working closely with the Jordanians on the issue. A Jordanian military delegation was at the Pentagon Thursday to meet with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta.

In addition to the danger of proliferation, there is a concern that Assad could actually use his WMDs if his situation becomes desperate.

“The WMD program is in play now, and that’s important because it highlights the innate danger that the existence of this regime poses to U.S. security and regional interests,” the administration official said. “[The demarche] puts Syria’s neighbors on notice and it reflects the recognition that a dangerous Assad regime is willing to do anything to save its own skin. If they are willing to kill the country to save the regime, they might be willing to do a great deal more damage throughout the region.”

Some officials inside and outside the administration see the WMD activity as helpful, but lament that such a high degree of planning is not taking place on the issue of how to precipitate the downfall of the Assad regime as quickly and as safely as possible.

Over 70 countries met in Tunis today to develop a unified message on the transition of power in Syria and urge the Assad regime to allow humanitarian access. The Saudi delegation actually walked out of the meeting, complaining of “inactivity” and urging the international community to arm the Syrian opposition.

The Obama administration has consistently rejected calls by the Syrian National Council and others to prepare for a military intervention in Syria and no real strategy exists internally to force Assad from power, another administration official said.

“Our strategic calculus can’t be solely about what comes after Assad without taking a hard look at how to bring about Assad’s downfall as safely as possible,” said this official. “The reality is, at some point, there will be a recognition you can’t plan for a post-Assad scenario without planning how to shape the downfall itself. You can’t separate the two.”

Concern about a gap in planning for how to oust the Assad regime is shared by some in Congress, including Sens. John McCain (R-AZ), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), and Lindsey Graham (R-SC), who issued a statement today urging the administration to start directly aiding the Syrian rebels and protecting Syrian civilians.

“Unfortunately, speeches and meetings by themselves will do nothing to stop the unacceptable slaughter in Syria, which is growing worse by the day,” the senators said. “We remain deeply concerned that our international diplomacy risks becoming divorced from the reality on the ground in Syria, which is now an armed conflict between Assad’s forces and the people of Syria who are struggling to defend themselves against indiscriminate attacks.”

In her prepared remarks in Tunis, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said she supported more sanctions on the Assad regime but she declined to endorse any direct help to the Syrian opposition without the consent of the Syrian government, saying only, “We all need to look hard at what more we can do.”


  • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VPZXYCU6GM2A2JSG5S66SPYC3U TyS

    I predicted this months ago

    I’ll wager this a key reason that the Leftists don’t want to intervene – God forbid they vindicate the Bush administration – nobody wants to chance uncovering the possibility of exposing the contents of those miles-long military convoys that entered Syria from Iraq in the months leading up to the Iraq War.

    • Solomonpal

      Huh? It’s leftists that have pushed all the current turmoil in the middle east and Syria is no exception. Question is why!

    • ATTILA

      They wish to pave the way for al queda in the aftermath.

    • Solomonpal

      Copy that.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VPZXYCU6GM2A2JSG5S66SPYC3U TyS

       You need to pay attention to who the Obama admin supported and who it did not…the Obama Admin ignited chaos in the (relatively) stable and/or benign Islamic countries throughout the middle east, while ignoring the most repressive and dangerous; funding and arming the resistances in Egypt, Yemen, Libya, which have all been overtaken by the Muslim Bortherhood….then ignoring the Green Revolution in Iran, genocide in Somalia, and the coup in the Maldives (I’ll bet 99% of the US general public don’t even know about the Maldives).

    • Solomonpall

      All the current turmoil. Why?

  • slam

    I remember , back in 2003 and later ,reading quite a few articles and stories on the internet asserting that Sadam’s WMD’s were sent to Syria for the purpose of hiding them from the USA and the U.N. It would be interesting to find out if this was ,in fact, the case.
     In my opinion why else would Syria stockpile stuff like Mustard Gas & Sarin Nerve agent ? Clearly use against Israel would have been suicidal so why even keep the stuff ? Maybe they were just hiding it for Sadam and his Sons ?

  • AFITgrad86

    The high value stuff like yellowcake or nuclear materials will go aboard the Iranian warships docked in Syria now.  The enemy of my enemy is my friend … or so the rationale will be.  The MANPADS will be a big concern as will nerve gas as those are something your garden variety terrorist could use for some real mischief.  I’m putting my hopes on the Israelis interdicting the Iranian warships on their voyage home in international waters with or without help from the US Navy.

    Eventually the truth concerning Sadam’s WMD and nuclear programs will be revealed .. only to be minimized by the libs because ‘it’s all Bush’s fault’ and to admit otherwise would be a renouncement of the whole Bush lied our boys died … mantra.

    Just my 2 cents …

  • Righton!

    Well no kidding.  I have known this for a long time.  Read Georges Sada’s book, “Saddam’s Secrets.”  He the top military officer in Bathist Iraq.  He has long publically stated that he loaded up Saddam’s WMDs and trucked them to Syria in the dead of night.  Stupid leftists.

  • abstracht

    WHAT!!!  The title is so absurdly misleading – nowhere in the article does it say that Syria’s WMD’s came from Iraq!  The article explicitly states that they are talking about WMDs produced in Syria.  FUrthermore, it quotes an administration official saying:  “We are talking about legitimate WMDs here — this isn’t Iraq. ”

    Wow!  Talk about brazen propaganda!

    • solomonpal

       ”We are talking about legitimate WMDs here — this isn’t Iraq. ” Now that would be a legitimate leftist claim.

    • http://pulse.yahoo.com/_VPZXYCU6GM2A2JSG5S66SPYC3U TyS

       you seem to have cognitive impairment – are you under 14 years of age, or just retarded?

    • Solomonpal

      I’ll overlook the insult at a fellow patriot. My point was Bush’s claim of WMD by the left was a ruse for intervention but this admins is legitamate ?

    • AFITgrad86

       Syria (and Saddam’s Iraq) is a Baathist Government .. a semi-secular Islamic fascist state.  In that regard both Syria and Iraq had common bonds.  They bot sough greater power in the region and both dabbled in WMDs as a part of that strategy.  When I say WMD I limit it to Chemical, Nuclear, and Biological weapons.  Syria is known to have enlisted the aid of N. Korea in an effort to advance their fledgling nuclear program.  They, like Iraq, also have been reputed to have somewhat primitive — but nonetheless effective — chemical weapons such as mustard gas and perhaps nerve gas.

      So to say they have WMD and the surrounding countries should be on guard to interdict shipments that would allow proliferation of these items to other countries is prudent.  However there is also the issue of were Syria’s WMD inventories (including a stockpile of uranium ‘yellow-cake”) enhanced by items shipped to them for safekeeping by Saddam Hussein?  There is ample evidence to believe this is the case.  So now what to do?

      Syria has access to the Mediterranean Sea which means dispatching the materials by sea rather than land makes sense to them — especially if their neighbors Jordan, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, Israel, and Iraq are either in the US camp or far more moderate than they.  The sure way to move them is by sea.  Coincidentally, there are two Iranian warships in the Med and docked in Syria.  You do the math …

      Syria also has a large inventory of conventional arms and has been a warehouse for various terrorist groups over the years.  Weapons such as shoulder fired anti-aircraft missiles are a real concern as they could be used against civilian aircraft.  Nerve gas or (potentially) biological agents are also an issue because of the rather small quantities needed to do significant damage in metropolitan areas.

      I find the term “Legitimate WMD’s” a bit odd … since nerve gas and biological weapons are banned by international treaty …   

  • http://twitter.com/RexRedbone Not Tom MannisThanks

    I guess all those WMDs that the left said just vanished into Thin Air from Iraq are in now found Syria is that why Nancy Polosi went to Syria to make sure that WMDs where never found ?