Home  »  2012 presidential campaign  »  Exclusive Breitbart: The Vetting Of Barack Obama Begins

Exclusive Breitbart: The Vetting Of Barack Obama Begins



Mar 5, 2012 21 Comments ›› Pat Dollard

Big Government:

The Vetting, Part I: Barack’s Love Song To Alinsky

By Andrew Breitbart

Prior to his passing, Andrew Breitbart said that the mission of the Breitbart empire was to exemplify the free and fearless press that our Constitution protects–but which, increasingly, the mainstream media denies us.

“Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?” – “Who guards the guardians?” Andrew saw himself in that role—as a guardian protecting Americans from the left’s “objective” loyal scribes.

Andrew wanted to do what the mainstream media would not. First and foremost: Andrew pledged to vet President Barack H. Obama.

Andrew did not want to re-litigate the 2008 election. Nor did he want to let Republicans off the hook. Instead, he wanted to show that the media had failed in its most basic duty: to uncover the truth, and hold those in power accountable, regardless of party.

From today through Election Day, November 6, 2012, we will vet this president–and his rivals.

We begin with a column Andrew wrote last week in preparation for today’s Big relaunch–a story that should swing the first hammer against the glass wall the mainstream media has built around Barack Obama.
***

In The Audacity of Hope, Barack Obama claims that he worried after 9/11 that his name, so similar to that of Osama bin Laden, might harm his political career.

But Obama was not always so worried about misspellings and radical resemblances. He may even have cultivated them as he cast himself as Chicago’s radical champion.

In 1998, a small Chicago theater company staged a play titled The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, dedicated to the life and politics of the radical community organizer whose methods Obama had practiced and taught on Chicago’s South Side.

Obama was not only in the audience, but also took the stage after one performance, participating in a panel discussion that was advertised in the poster for the play.

Recently, veteran Chicago journalist Michael Miner mocked emerging conservative curiosity about the play, along with enduring suspicions about the links between Alinsky and Obama. Writing in the Chicago Reader, Miner described the poster:

Let’s take a look at this poster.

It’s red—and that right there, like the darkening water that swirls down Janet Leigh’s drain [in Psycho’s famous shower scene], is plenty suggestive. It touts a play called The Love Song of Saul Alinsky, Alinsky being the notorious community organizer from Chicago who wrote books with titles like Reveille for Radicals and Rules for Radicals. On it, fists are raised—meaning insurrection is in the air.

And down at the very bottom, crawling across the poster in small print, it mentions the panel discussions that will follow the Sunday performances. The panelists are that era’s usual “progressive” suspects: Leon Despres, Monsignor Jack Egan, Studs Terkel . . .

And state senator Barack Obama.

Miner obscured the truth. His article only reveals only a small portion of the poster. Here’s the whole poster:

AlinskyPosterFullRez

And here’s the press release:

So, what’s in the play? It truly is a love song to Alinsky. In the first few minutes of the play, Alinsky plays Moses – yes, the Biblical Moses – talking to God. The play glorifies Alinsky stealing food from restaurants and organizing others to do the same, explaining, “I saw it as a practical use of social ecology: you had members of the intellectual community, the hope of the future, eating regularly for six months, staying alive till they could make their contributions to society.”

In an introspective moment, Alinsky rips America: “My country … ‘tis of whatthehell / And justice up a tree … How much can you sell / What’s in it for me.” He grins about manipulating the Christian community to back his programs. He talks in glowing terms about engaging in Chicago politics with former Mayor Kelly. He rips the McCarthy committee, mocking, “Everyone was there, when you think back – Cotton Mather, Hester Prynn, Anne Hutchinson, Tom Paine, Tom Jefferson … Brandeis, Holmes … Gene Debs and the socialists … Huey Long … Imperial Wizards of all stripes … Father Coughlin and his money machine … Daffy Duck, Elmer Fudd … and a kicking chorus of sterilized reactionaries singing O Come, All Ye Faithful …”

Keep reading…script type=”text/javascript”


  • http://www.warrenjasonstreet.com/ Warren Jason Street

    You do get that it was a play, correct? And that plays reflect things we do not necessarily agree with, right?

    This is like saying that if he’d gone to see The Producers that he would have endorsed making fun of Hitler in order to make a quick buck.

    Breitbart FAIL.

  • Hidelyheaux

     Apparently you missed the part where OBAMA served on the discussion panel.  /FAIL

  • http://twitter.com/RexRedbone Not Tom MannisThanks

    I like that guest was not willing to let his/her/its posting name thats the real fail!

  • richwill

    More like chickenshit.

  • Dug4210

    As someone who has worked in small theater companies in Chicago and New York, I can tell you that post-show discussions like these are dull, dull, dull. They usually happen when an overly excited director decides that their production is IMPORTANT and must be talked about by serious people. So some serious people are offered free tickets, some post-show cheap wine and cheese and a chance to show their faces in public, which can be useful if you’re a politician, author, or anyone else who needs an opportunity to self-promote. I assure you, most of the cast and crew were eager for the discussion to end so they could get to the nearest bar. 

  • I’m Right You’re Wrong.

    If you want to have an opinion on this site, don’t be an ANONYMOUS DOUCHEBAG AND LEAVE YOUR CREDENTIALS SO WE CAN DEBATE AND VET YOU FOR THE LIB LEFT DOUCHE CRONIE THAT YOU ARE.

    TROLL. LEAVE.

  • YERMOM

     So how does that excuse Dear Leader from being on the panel. Just cause it was boring?

  • Certainly not a guest

    Yeah, just so you assholes know–Dollard is a punk who blocked me from cleaning your sorry asses up.

  • DC

    You should have started by cleaning up your own sorry ass! Did you really think you were contributing to this site? (eye-roll)

  • Broberts

    Sex with your mother was boring.  But it still happened. She was there.

  • Alvin

    So non-important they invited, and was excepted, a state senator to talk on the topic. If you have a Christmas pagent, and have a panel discussion afterwards the panelists must consider it vital.

  • Alvin

    Guest, please direct me to the place on the poster where it says, “Alinsky, a comedy”. Considering that Obama taught Alinsky as part of his carreer you point is rendered moot.

    Good day, sir.

  • Jeff Hines

    Who might you be, punkette?

  • http://twitter.com/boogiefinger Dan

    If you don’t know what it is, then you dont know what it is like. Relative or moral equivalency argument FAIL. He taught Alinsky tactics as a community organizer. Breitbart WIN!!!

  • Elaine Mccombs

    This is great article. He was a great warrior,

  • JDelta

    Andrew Breitbart was one of the rare few at his level who actually got it. He actually understood how all this shit has gone down. He really got who the skinny hustler #occupying the White House actually is at heart. He saw right through his little game.

    Did Baraka “cultivate radical resemblances as he cast himself as Chicago’s radical champion”? You’re fuckin’ A right he did. He’s a fucking chameleon. One day in Chicago he’s an American Mau Mau and the next on the national stage he’s the Magic Negro. And I use that word intentionally: stage. There’s a thin line between acting and deception, if one exists at all.

    Maybe it was the Hollywood in Breitbart that allowed him to so clearly understood the nature of this game – the game of power and perception.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Jamal-Jenkums/100003588710988 Jamal Jenkums

    Oblunder is going to finally have to answer some rough questions. How long can the MSM continue to IGNORE the facts around this impostor? I guess Owhammy will bomb Iran or something to draw attention off of his problems. Maybe Clinton can draw him a map to that aspirin factory.

  • HabaneroBabe

    While interesting as a point of reference on the character of the DIC (Dirtbag in Chief), I have to say that I am very disappointed in this article as the first big  publication from the Breitbart site.  It is underwhelming as far as it goes, and I just have to say “yea, so what else is new?  The DIC is a commie.  Tell me something I don’t know.”  I was hoping that the first article after Andrew Breitbart’s death would have more impact, more meat.  I wanted something that would really take a bite out of the DIC’s ass.  This is nothing more than another minor point of historical information on his character or lack thereof.  

    I really hope that this is not the best thing they have found.  I want to see the DIC roasted by the Breitbart Legacy sites.

  • Adrian

    No one has seen the video or has any idea what is on it and the person holding the tape says that it will never be released.  We don’t even know if the tape really exists. This is another Whitey Tape. 

    yaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaawn

  • Noway2no

    Who is Barry Soetoro?

  • Noway2no

     ..or PRIC Posing Resident In Chief