Home  »  Politics  »  Holder’s New Letter Satisfies Rand Paul: ‘No,’ The U.S. Can’t Use Drone To Kill Citizens On U.S. Soil Not Engaged In Combat


Mar 7, 2013 No Comments ›› Jake Hammer

Excerpted from The Washington Post: Attorney General Eric Holder has written a letter to Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) saying that a drone could not be used against a noncombatant American. In response, Paul has said he the Senate should move ahead with John Brennan’s nomination as director of the CIA. The vote is being held this afternoon.

The letter followed a 13-hour filibuster of Brennan by Paul and several other senators, who objected to the possibility of domestic drone strikes on U.S. citizens.

“Does the president have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on U.S. soil?” Holder’s letter reads. “The answer to that is no.”

Paul said Thursday afternoon that he’s happy with the response and that he urges the Senate to proceed to a vote on Brennan’s nomination.

“I’m quite happy with the answer,” Paul said. “Through the advise and consent process, I’ve got an important answer.”

Paul added of the Brennan vote: “Yes, we’ll hold it as soon as people want to today.”

Keep reading…

Excerpted from WEEKLY STANDARD: Eric Holder responds to Rand Paul’s filibuster with this letter:

Dear Senator Paul:

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question: “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

Sincerely,

Eric Holder

Here’s an image of that letter:

343434

UPDATE: Apparently, the White House and Justice Department failed to send the letter to the person who asked the question–Rand Paul.

3232