Tensions Rise As El Baradei Shields Iran’s Nuclear Weapons Campaign

August 31st, 2007 Posted By Pat Dollard.

klghjv

“French President Nicolas Sarkozy this week declared the Iranian nuclear issue the worst crisis in the world, and called for more pressure upon Iran to “enable us to escape an alternative that I say is catastrophic: the Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran.” And the IAEA announced a shocking, unilateral deal to leave iran alone by year’s end.

CSM:

Istanbul, Turkey - American and Iranian leaders are boosting their belligerent rhetoric, even as the UN’s nuclear watchdog reported Thursday that Iran’s nuclear program is moving slower than expected and below capacity.

In results likely to blunt US efforts to further sanction Iran, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran’s expanding efforts still defy Security Council resolutions, but that cooperation in clearing up continued suspicions marked “a significant step forward.”

lknjkbnjkb

In the war of words that escalated this week, President George Bush charged on Tuesday that Iran’s pursuit of nuclear technology put the Mideast “under the shadow of a nuclear holocaust.”

Pressures are mounting on all sides. Washington awaits a key US progress report on Iraq, where American accusations of Iranian support for anti-US militias has sharpened. And the IAEA this week unveiled a deal with Iran to “resolve” all outstanding questions by year’s end, a deal that analysts say risks ending investigations too early.

“Iran is now facing a litmus test to provide answers in a timely manner to our questions,” the IAEA deputy head Olli Heinonen said in Vienna. “If the answers [from Iran] are not satisfactory, we are making new questions until we are satisfied with the answers.”

The top US commander in Iraq, Gen. David Petraeus and US Ambassador Ryan Crocker are to give assessments on the effect of a months-long surge in Baghdad the second week of September that will shape future US deployments and withdrawal plans for Iraq.

“The US is seriously concerned about Iranian support for violence in Iraq that has killed American soldiers, and as we get close to the date of the Petraeus report, the Iran factor looms large,” says Mark Fitzpatrick, an Iran expert at the International Institute of Strategic Studies in London. “It’s natural that President Bush would point to that external factor as a reason not to cut and run from Iraq.”

Using his strongest public language on Iran to date, President Bush on Tuesday repeated charges that Iran is causing US deaths in Iraq by supporting and supplying weaponry to Shiite militias and said he ordered US commanders to “confront Tehran’s murderous activities.”

Iranian spokesmen this week again denied supporting anti-US actions in Iraq and, in Vienna, warned the US and West against pushing for a third round of Security Council sanctions.

Speaking Tuesday in Tehran just hours before Bush, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad dismissed the US as an empire in decline, with failure in Iraq leaving a “huge power vacuum” that Iran was ready to fill.

“The political power of the occupiers is collapsing rapidly,” said Mr. Ahmadinejad. “Occupation is the root of all problems in Iraq. It has become clear that occupiers are not able to resolve regional issues.”

Iranian Foreign Minister Manouchehr Mottaki on Thursday dismissed US claims that Iran is interfering in Iraq as lacking evidence, saying that Bush’s statements “are a sign of indecision, lack of wisdom, and political despair.”

A separate draft report by the Government Accountability Office, described Thursday as “strikingly negative” by The Washington Post, which acquired the document, found that only three of 18 benchmarks mandated by Congress had been met in Iraq.

The arrest of seven Iranians and their Iraqi guards at the Sheraton hotel in Baghdad this week – with television footage showing them blindfolded and being led out of the hotel by US soldiers – threatened a further deterioration, akin to the arrest of five Iranians in northern Iraq in January, who remain in custody. They were released next morning, with an adviser to General Petraeus expressing “regret” after it became known the group were on official business.

Iran says its efforts are peaceful

Iran says it aims only to peacefully produce nuclear power. The US and many in the West believe the civilian program masks a secret weapons effort.

“Iran made a fast start but then there was a leveling off,” a senior UN official told Reuters about the enrichment effort. “We don’t know the reasons, but the slow pace continues.”

US Ambassador to the IAEA Gregory Schulte said Iran’s case was far from resolved. “Even if Iran comes clean on the past, its nuclear file cannot be closed until the agency has full insight into the present,” he told AFP.

The IAEA reports that Iran is currently enriching uranium at 3.7 percent – far from the nearly 90 percent required for a bomb – and less than the 4.8 percent it has achieved in the past. Any enrichment level under 5 percent is suitable for nuclear fuel.

Iran is also short on its declared aims to install new centrifuges. It has fewer than 2,000 in operation, and several hundred more are being tested or assembled. Two sets of UN Security Council resolutions already target Iran over its decision not to suspend enrichment.

“Ahmadinejad wants to show that he has this foreign policy success and that his robustness has worked,” says Ali Ansari, author of “Confronting Iran.” “He wants to maintain this mythology that Iran is a great power because it is a nuclear power, and there is this staunch belief that America is an empire in decline … and that Iraq is an indication of this decline.”

The result has helped the rhetoric spiral, says Mr. Ansari, an Iran historian at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland.

“Of course, the more you talk about that, the more you raise the hackles on the side of the Americans, who say, ‘You think we are in decline? We’ll show you how in decline we are …’ ” adds Ansari. “There are elements in the US, as there are elements in Iran, who are keen to provoke a conflict.”

IAEA may ‘close files’ on Iran

French President Nicolas Sarkozy this week declared the Iranian nuclear issue the worst crisis in the world, and called for more pressure upon Iran to “enable us to escape an alternative that I say is catastrophic: the Iranian bomb or the bombing of Iran.”

Ahmadinejad brushed off Mr. Sarkozy’s comments, declaring that Iran’s cooperation with the IAEA was such that “from our point of view, Iran’s nuclear case is closed. Iran is a nuclear nation and has the fuel cycle.”

The IAEA has not yet come to that conclusion, though the agreement it struck with Iran spells out a timeline for resolving all issues that have dogged four years of inspections.

From traces of highly enriched uranium (HEU) to centrifuge designs to “alleged studies” of suspicious projects, including plans for a missile reentry vehicle, the IAEA promises to “close files” and revert to “routine” safeguard work, if Iran answers final sets of questions from the IAEA.

“This means that after receiving the questions, no other questions are left,” the agreement reads. The IAEA report comes ahead of a meeting Sept. 10 of the IAEA Board of Governors.

The deal has been criticized by nuclear experts. “To date, so many times the IAEA has had discussions with Iran [and] Iran’s answers have led to more questions,” says Iran expert Mr. Fitzpatrick, speaking before the IAEA report came out Thursday. “It ties up loose ends before you know if there are any loose ends to tie up.”

The IAEA sought to ease those concerns Thursday, noting that only more intrusive inspections – which Iran has not permitted for more than a year – could verify the program as peaceful. “The key is that Iran … provides the information that we need,” said the IAEA’s Mr. Heinonen.


5 Responses

  1. David M.

    Ummah and Taqiyya.
    Ummah menas the community of islam, to which El-Baradei belongs,
    and to whom El-Baradei owes more allegiance than to any individual
    country or organization. This isn’t anything new. El-Baradei has
    been helping to promote islamic nuclear weapons for years. And
    of course he uses Taqiyya.
    Taqiyya - lying, religiously approved for the purpose of spreading islam.
    I don’t know what to think about this report. Given the pretty
    sound postulate that everything the UN does is useless, I’m not sure
    that applying more sanctions would work anyways. It might give the
    appearance of working, but Iran would carry on anyways,
    and reasonable people would have to conclude that their nuke
    program (they aren’t building ANY nuclear power stations) is
    being conducted at locations that neither we nor the UN knows
    about.
    We are going to have to fight a war with Iran. There is no choice.
    Almond Dinner Jab, their Prez, already told us that when he
    published the target list of American cities in his “World
    beyond Zionism” lecture in Qom. The only degree of freedom left
    open to us is to choose who starts it. Israel, Iran, or the USA?

    An interesting side question from yesterday’s news. Why have
    chemical weapons ingredients been found inside the UN at the
    offices of former weapons inspectors to Iraq?
    :???:

  2. Steve in NC

    What is blatent and in your face is the iranian statement that the nuke program is for energy. If it really was than why need inpections? The production of nuclear power is known technology, there is no state secrets to protect. The merry go round of bullshit has got to stop before those goat fuckers get the bomb.
    Destroy all equipment and kill everyone involved in the program now. And send the un to brussels.

  3. OKA

    Why should any sane person believe the IAEA and El B after the screw up they allowed in IRAQ?

  4. Dan (The Infidel)

    “Iran is now facing a litmus test to provide answers in a timely manner to our questions,” the IAEA deputy head Olli Heinonen said in Vienna. “If the answers [from Iran] are not satisfactory, we are making new questions until we are satisfied with the answers.””

    Wow…so does mean the UN is going to call a meeting to discuss the meeting, than plan another meeting to discuss that meeting too?

    El Baradei is an Islamist as has already been pointed out. He could care less what the US says. His job is to bullshit his UN Dhimis and buy time for the bomb that will kill his Jewish enemies.

    El Baredei is a tool of the jihadis. He should have an “accident”. Yeah and move the UN to some other country…like maybe bumfuckEqypt.

  5. John Cunningham

    Resolving all questions by year’s end would risk ending investigations “too early”. You fucking idiots.

Respond now.

alert Be respectful of others and their opinions. Inflammatory remarks and inane leftist drivel will be deleted. It ain’t about free speech, remember you’re in a private domain. My website, my prerogative.

alert If you can't handle using your real email address, don't bother posting a comment.

:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?: :beer: