Toggle the Widgetbar

EXPOSED: FBI Allowed Hillary Aides To ‘Destroy’ Laptops In Newly Uncovered “Side Agreements”

2 Comments
Darby Crash

Excerpted From Zero Hedge: Just when you think the Hillary email scandal can’t get any more bizarre and corrupt, it does. According to a just released letter from the Chairman of the House Judiciary Committee, Bob Goodlatte (R - Virginia), to Attorney General Lynch, the FBI apparently struck “side agreements” with both Cheryl Mills an Heather Samuelson to “destroy” their “laptops after concluding its search.”

While we parse the letter to understand what basis for action the FBI may have had when pursuing such a course of action, we can’t help but note that the FBI appears to have acted as a co-conspirator in what appears to be an unprecedented case of destruction of key evidence.

Below are some of the key excerpts from the letter (full document attached at the end of this post):

    As part of the Judiciary Committee’s ongoing oversight of Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State, the Justice Department (DOJ) provided in camera review’ of certain immunity agreements. After a specific request from the Committee, based on references made in the immunity agreements to certain “side agreements,” DOJ subsequently provided in camera review of those “side agreements” between DOJ, the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI), and Beth Wilkinson, the lawyer representing both Cheryl Mills and Heather Samuelson. Like many things about this case, these new materials raise more questions than answers. Please provide a written response to the below questions and make DOJ staff available for a briefing on this matter no later than October 10, 2016.

    1. Why did the FBI agree to destroy both Cheryl Mills’ and Heather Samuelson’s laptops after concluding its search?

    2. Doesn’t the willingness of Ms. Mills and Ms. Samuelson to have their laptops destroyed by the FBI contradict their claim that the laptops could have been withheld because they contained non-relevant, privileged information? If so, doesn’t that undermine the claim that the side agreements were necessary?

    7. Please explain why DOJ agreed to limit their search of the Mills and Samuelson laptops to a date no later than January 31, 2015 and therefore give up any opportunity to find evidence related to the destruction of evidence or obstruction of justice related to Secretary Clinton’s unauthorized use of a private email server during her tenure as Secretary of State.

Keep reading

100316 Goodlatte Letter to AG Lynch by zerohedge on Scribd

  • pukus

    Where were you guys when Bush/Cheney deleted between 2,000,000-5,000,000 emails after the partisan firing of many competent U.S. attorneys? That’s right, you DID NOT CARE.

    • Hand Full Of Blood

      never happened.

  • Trump vs. Cruz: Who Do You Back For 2016? Vote Here
  • Princess Kate Middleton Leaves Royal Family, Starts Skincare Line
  • Ever Looked Yourself Up? New Site Leaves No Stone Unturned
  • Viagra's Newest Replacement Is Cheaper, Safer and Faster Buy Now!
  • How Melissa McCarthy Shed a Shocking 50 Pounds in 30 Days
  • Dirty Secrets: How Normal Guys Lose Weight
  • Americans Urged to Search Their Names Before Site Gets Taken Down
  • Barbara Walters Refuses to Return to the View, Due to This Secret
Powered by Newsmax.

Twitter

Tweets by @PatDollard

Categories