Toggle the Widgetbar

Obama’s Micromanagement Of Airstrikes Hinders War Against ISIS, Generals Say

Infidel Ali
Obama’s Micromanagement Of Airstrikes Hinders War Against ISIS, Generals Say

Excerpted from The Washington Times: The monthly scorecards issued by U.S. Central Command’s Air Force component illustrate how carefully — critics would say how inadequately — the White House oversees the air war against the Islamic State.

About half the combat missions actually unleash ordnance. The other aircraft return to base with just as many bombs and missiles as when they left.

“It is not an air campaign,” said retired Air Force Lt. Gen. Thomas McInerney, a Vietnam War fighter pilot and one of 88 admirals and generals who signed a letter supporting Donald Trump. “In addition, a general in Baghdad must approve every bomb dropped — handcuffs on air power to let ISIS survive.”

The Islamic State is also known as ISIS, ISIL and Daesh, an Arabic acronym.

The micromanagement reaches higher than Baghdad: A number of military people say the Obama White House wants as close to zero civilian casualties as possible.

In the two-year air war, the Pentagon has sent its most sophisticated and lethal warplanes, including the B-1B bomber and F-22 fighter. But there are many off-limits targets — including buildings in Raqqa, Syria, the Islamic State’s proclaimed capital, and Mosul, Iraq, its largest urban prize — because they house civilians as well as fighters.

The White House directions reach outside Syria and Iraq to Libya, home to one of Islamic State’s largest armies. The top general for Africa testified he needs White House approval for any airstrike. As a result, such military action has been rare in Libya since 2011, when intense U.S. and NATO bombings led to the overthrow of Moammar Gadhafi.

The numbers tell the story in Operation Inherent Resolve, the mission to defeat the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria.

This year the U.S.-led coalition has launched 12,350 combat missions. Of those, 6,575 — about half — dropped one or more weapons.

The count was similar in 2015: 21,113 missions — 9,914 munitions-dropping missions.

Critics say these numbers mean the Islamic State has been allowed to operate for too long. A much more intense campaign could have killed more fighters and saved more innocent lives from Islamic State’s butchery, they say.

Retired Air Force Lt. Gen. David A. Deptula is an ex-fighter pilot and war planner — and one of the air campaign’s fiercest critics.

“We have it within our capacity to demolish the Islamic State, leading to the elimination of their sanctuary to export terror to the United States,” Mr. Deptula told The Washington Times. “However, to do so will require moving beyond the current gradualist, sequential, Iraq-first approach to dealing with them. The anemic application of airstrikes must be replaced with a more robust, comprehensive, rapid and simultaneous use of air power — not simply in support of indigenous allied ground forces, but as the key force in decomposing the Islamic State.” Keep reading

  • Trump vs. Cruz: Who Do You Back For 2016? Vote Here
  • Princess Kate Middleton Leaves Royal Family, Starts Skincare Line
  • Ever Looked Yourself Up? New Site Leaves No Stone Unturned
  • Viagra’s Newest Replacement Is Cheaper, Safer and Faster Buy Now!
  • How Melissa McCarthy Shed a Shocking 50 Pounds in 30 Days
  • Dirty Secrets: How Normal Guys Lose Weight
  • Americans Urged to Search Their Names Before Site Gets Taken Down
  • Barbara Walters Refuses to Return to the View, Due to This Secret
Powered by Newsmax.


Tweets by @PatDollard